Cargando…

The incidence of training responsiveness to cardiorespiratory fitness and cardiometabolic measurements following individualized and standardized exercise prescription: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: There is individual variability to cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) training, but the underlying cause is not well understood. Traditionally, a standardized approach to exercise prescription has utilized relative percentages of maximal heart rate, heart rate reserve (HRR), maximal oxygen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weatherwax, Ryan M., Harris, Nigel K., Kilding, Andrew E., Dalleck, Lance C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5168814/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27993169
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1735-0
_version_ 1782483417518047232
author Weatherwax, Ryan M.
Harris, Nigel K.
Kilding, Andrew E.
Dalleck, Lance C.
author_facet Weatherwax, Ryan M.
Harris, Nigel K.
Kilding, Andrew E.
Dalleck, Lance C.
author_sort Weatherwax, Ryan M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is individual variability to cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) training, but the underlying cause is not well understood. Traditionally, a standardized approach to exercise prescription has utilized relative percentages of maximal heart rate, heart rate reserve (HRR), maximal oxygen uptake (VO(2)max), or VO(2) reserve to establish exercise intensity. However, this model fails to take into consideration individual metabolic responses to exercise and may attribute to the variability in training responses. It has been proposed that an individualized approach would take into consideration metabolic responses to exercises to increase responsiveness to training. METHODS: In this randomized control trial, participants will undergo a 12-week exercise intervention using individualized (ventilatory thresholds) and standardized (HRR) methods to prescribe CRF training intensity. Following the intervention, participants will be categorized as responders or non-responders based on changes in maximal aerobic abilities. Participants who are non-responders will complete a second 12-week intervention in a crossover design to determine whether they can become responders with a differing exercise prescription. There are four main research outcomes: (1) determine the cohort-specific technical error to use in the categorization of response rate; (2) determine if an individualized intensity prescription is superior to a standard approach in regards to VO(2)max and cardiometabolic risk factors; (3) investigate the time course changes throughout 12 weeks of CRF training between the two intervention groups; and (4) determine if non-responders can become responders if the exercise prescription is modified. DISCUSSION: The findings from this research will provide evidence on the effectiveness of individualized exercise prescription related to training responsiveness of VO(2)max and cardiometabolic risk factors compared to a standardized approach and further our understanding of individual exercise responses. If the individualized approach proposed is deemed effective, it may change the way exercise specialists prescribe exercise intensity to enhance training responsiveness. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02868710. Registered on 15 August 2016. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-016-1735-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5168814
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51688142016-12-23 The incidence of training responsiveness to cardiorespiratory fitness and cardiometabolic measurements following individualized and standardized exercise prescription: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial Weatherwax, Ryan M. Harris, Nigel K. Kilding, Andrew E. Dalleck, Lance C. Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: There is individual variability to cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) training, but the underlying cause is not well understood. Traditionally, a standardized approach to exercise prescription has utilized relative percentages of maximal heart rate, heart rate reserve (HRR), maximal oxygen uptake (VO(2)max), or VO(2) reserve to establish exercise intensity. However, this model fails to take into consideration individual metabolic responses to exercise and may attribute to the variability in training responses. It has been proposed that an individualized approach would take into consideration metabolic responses to exercises to increase responsiveness to training. METHODS: In this randomized control trial, participants will undergo a 12-week exercise intervention using individualized (ventilatory thresholds) and standardized (HRR) methods to prescribe CRF training intensity. Following the intervention, participants will be categorized as responders or non-responders based on changes in maximal aerobic abilities. Participants who are non-responders will complete a second 12-week intervention in a crossover design to determine whether they can become responders with a differing exercise prescription. There are four main research outcomes: (1) determine the cohort-specific technical error to use in the categorization of response rate; (2) determine if an individualized intensity prescription is superior to a standard approach in regards to VO(2)max and cardiometabolic risk factors; (3) investigate the time course changes throughout 12 weeks of CRF training between the two intervention groups; and (4) determine if non-responders can become responders if the exercise prescription is modified. DISCUSSION: The findings from this research will provide evidence on the effectiveness of individualized exercise prescription related to training responsiveness of VO(2)max and cardiometabolic risk factors compared to a standardized approach and further our understanding of individual exercise responses. If the individualized approach proposed is deemed effective, it may change the way exercise specialists prescribe exercise intensity to enhance training responsiveness. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02868710. Registered on 15 August 2016. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-016-1735-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-12-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5168814/ /pubmed/27993169 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1735-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Weatherwax, Ryan M.
Harris, Nigel K.
Kilding, Andrew E.
Dalleck, Lance C.
The incidence of training responsiveness to cardiorespiratory fitness and cardiometabolic measurements following individualized and standardized exercise prescription: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title The incidence of training responsiveness to cardiorespiratory fitness and cardiometabolic measurements following individualized and standardized exercise prescription: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_full The incidence of training responsiveness to cardiorespiratory fitness and cardiometabolic measurements following individualized and standardized exercise prescription: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr The incidence of training responsiveness to cardiorespiratory fitness and cardiometabolic measurements following individualized and standardized exercise prescription: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed The incidence of training responsiveness to cardiorespiratory fitness and cardiometabolic measurements following individualized and standardized exercise prescription: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_short The incidence of training responsiveness to cardiorespiratory fitness and cardiometabolic measurements following individualized and standardized exercise prescription: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_sort incidence of training responsiveness to cardiorespiratory fitness and cardiometabolic measurements following individualized and standardized exercise prescription: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5168814/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27993169
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1735-0
work_keys_str_mv AT weatherwaxryanm theincidenceoftrainingresponsivenesstocardiorespiratoryfitnessandcardiometabolicmeasurementsfollowingindividualizedandstandardizedexerciseprescriptionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT harrisnigelk theincidenceoftrainingresponsivenesstocardiorespiratoryfitnessandcardiometabolicmeasurementsfollowingindividualizedandstandardizedexerciseprescriptionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kildingandrewe theincidenceoftrainingresponsivenesstocardiorespiratoryfitnessandcardiometabolicmeasurementsfollowingindividualizedandstandardizedexerciseprescriptionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT dallecklancec theincidenceoftrainingresponsivenesstocardiorespiratoryfitnessandcardiometabolicmeasurementsfollowingindividualizedandstandardizedexerciseprescriptionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT weatherwaxryanm incidenceoftrainingresponsivenesstocardiorespiratoryfitnessandcardiometabolicmeasurementsfollowingindividualizedandstandardizedexerciseprescriptionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT harrisnigelk incidenceoftrainingresponsivenesstocardiorespiratoryfitnessandcardiometabolicmeasurementsfollowingindividualizedandstandardizedexerciseprescriptionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kildingandrewe incidenceoftrainingresponsivenesstocardiorespiratoryfitnessandcardiometabolicmeasurementsfollowingindividualizedandstandardizedexerciseprescriptionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT dallecklancec incidenceoftrainingresponsivenesstocardiorespiratoryfitnessandcardiometabolicmeasurementsfollowingindividualizedandstandardizedexerciseprescriptionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial