Cargando…

Diabetes self-management education after pre-selection of patients: design of a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Many self-management programs have been developed so far. Their effectiveness varies. The program ‘Beyond Good Intentions’ (BGI) is based on proactive coping and has proven to be (cost-) effective in achieving reductions in BMI and blood pressure in screen-detected type 2 diabetes patien...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vos, Rimke C., Eikelenboom, Nathalie W. D., Klomp, Maarten, Stellato, Rebecca K., Rutten, Guy E. H. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5168861/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28031750
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13098-016-0199-4
_version_ 1782483427682942976
author Vos, Rimke C.
Eikelenboom, Nathalie W. D.
Klomp, Maarten
Stellato, Rebecca K.
Rutten, Guy E. H. M.
author_facet Vos, Rimke C.
Eikelenboom, Nathalie W. D.
Klomp, Maarten
Stellato, Rebecca K.
Rutten, Guy E. H. M.
author_sort Vos, Rimke C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Many self-management programs have been developed so far. Their effectiveness varies. The program ‘Beyond Good Intentions’ (BGI) is based on proactive coping and has proven to be (cost-) effective in achieving reductions in BMI and blood pressure in screen-detected type 2 diabetes patients up until nine months follow-up. However, its long-term effectiveness in people already known with diabetes is lacking. In addition, its (cost-) effectiveness might increase if people who are likely not to be benefit from the program are excluded in a valid way. Therefore it was aimed to investigate the long-term effects of the educational program BGI on cardiovascular risk, quality of life and diabetes self-management behaviour in a pre-selected group of patients known with type 2 diabetes up to 5 years. METHODS: Randomised controlled trial with 2.5 year follow-up. Adults (≤75 years) with a type 2 diabetes duration between 3 months and 5 years will be included. With the use of a self-management screening tool (SeMaS) their potential barriers of self-management due to depression and/or anxiety will be determined. Based on the results of the SeMaS selection patients will be randomised (1:1) to the BGI-group (n = 53) or the control-group (n = 53). In addition to receiving usual care, patients in the BGI-group will follow the 12-week theory-based self-management program and a booster session a few months thereafter. The control-group will receive care as usual. The primary outcome is change in Body Mass Index after 2.5 years follow-up. Secondary outcomes are HbA1c, lipid profile and systolic blood pressure, (diabetes) quality of life, level of physical activity, dietary intake and medication adherence and proactive coping. Cost-effectiveness will be based on total use of health care resources during the entire study period. Difference between groups in change over time will be analysed according to intention-to-treat analysis. CONCLUSIONS: By differentiating between patients who will and those who are likely not to benefit from the educational program, a more (cost-) effective self-management program might be designed, also on the long-run. Trial registration NTR 5330
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5168861
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51688612016-12-28 Diabetes self-management education after pre-selection of patients: design of a randomised controlled trial Vos, Rimke C. Eikelenboom, Nathalie W. D. Klomp, Maarten Stellato, Rebecca K. Rutten, Guy E. H. M. Diabetol Metab Syndr Research BACKGROUND: Many self-management programs have been developed so far. Their effectiveness varies. The program ‘Beyond Good Intentions’ (BGI) is based on proactive coping and has proven to be (cost-) effective in achieving reductions in BMI and blood pressure in screen-detected type 2 diabetes patients up until nine months follow-up. However, its long-term effectiveness in people already known with diabetes is lacking. In addition, its (cost-) effectiveness might increase if people who are likely not to be benefit from the program are excluded in a valid way. Therefore it was aimed to investigate the long-term effects of the educational program BGI on cardiovascular risk, quality of life and diabetes self-management behaviour in a pre-selected group of patients known with type 2 diabetes up to 5 years. METHODS: Randomised controlled trial with 2.5 year follow-up. Adults (≤75 years) with a type 2 diabetes duration between 3 months and 5 years will be included. With the use of a self-management screening tool (SeMaS) their potential barriers of self-management due to depression and/or anxiety will be determined. Based on the results of the SeMaS selection patients will be randomised (1:1) to the BGI-group (n = 53) or the control-group (n = 53). In addition to receiving usual care, patients in the BGI-group will follow the 12-week theory-based self-management program and a booster session a few months thereafter. The control-group will receive care as usual. The primary outcome is change in Body Mass Index after 2.5 years follow-up. Secondary outcomes are HbA1c, lipid profile and systolic blood pressure, (diabetes) quality of life, level of physical activity, dietary intake and medication adherence and proactive coping. Cost-effectiveness will be based on total use of health care resources during the entire study period. Difference between groups in change over time will be analysed according to intention-to-treat analysis. CONCLUSIONS: By differentiating between patients who will and those who are likely not to benefit from the educational program, a more (cost-) effective self-management program might be designed, also on the long-run. Trial registration NTR 5330 BioMed Central 2016-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5168861/ /pubmed/28031750 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13098-016-0199-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Vos, Rimke C.
Eikelenboom, Nathalie W. D.
Klomp, Maarten
Stellato, Rebecca K.
Rutten, Guy E. H. M.
Diabetes self-management education after pre-selection of patients: design of a randomised controlled trial
title Diabetes self-management education after pre-selection of patients: design of a randomised controlled trial
title_full Diabetes self-management education after pre-selection of patients: design of a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Diabetes self-management education after pre-selection of patients: design of a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Diabetes self-management education after pre-selection of patients: design of a randomised controlled trial
title_short Diabetes self-management education after pre-selection of patients: design of a randomised controlled trial
title_sort diabetes self-management education after pre-selection of patients: design of a randomised controlled trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5168861/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28031750
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13098-016-0199-4
work_keys_str_mv AT vosrimkec diabetesselfmanagementeducationafterpreselectionofpatientsdesignofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT eikelenboomnathaliewd diabetesselfmanagementeducationafterpreselectionofpatientsdesignofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT klompmaarten diabetesselfmanagementeducationafterpreselectionofpatientsdesignofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT stellatorebeccak diabetesselfmanagementeducationafterpreselectionofpatientsdesignofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT ruttenguyehm diabetesselfmanagementeducationafterpreselectionofpatientsdesignofarandomisedcontrolledtrial