Cargando…
Managing complex respiratory patients in the community: an evaluation of a pilot integrated respiratory care service
INTRODUCTION: In the UK, there is significant variation in respiratory care and outcomes. An integrated approach to the management of high-risk respiratory patients, incorporating specialist and primary care teams' expertise, is the basis for new integrated respiratory services designed to redu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5174798/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28074134 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2016-000145 |
_version_ | 1782484556919603200 |
---|---|
author | Gillett, K Lippiett, K Astles, C Longstaff, J Orlando, R Lin, S X Powell, A Roberts, C Chauhan, A J Thomas, M Wilkinson, T M |
author_facet | Gillett, K Lippiett, K Astles, C Longstaff, J Orlando, R Lin, S X Powell, A Roberts, C Chauhan, A J Thomas, M Wilkinson, T M |
author_sort | Gillett, K |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: In the UK, there is significant variation in respiratory care and outcomes. An integrated approach to the management of high-risk respiratory patients, incorporating specialist and primary care teams' expertise, is the basis for new integrated respiratory services designed to reduce this variation; however, this model needs evaluating. METHODS: To evaluate an integrated service managing high-risk respiratory patients, electronic searches for patients with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease at risk of poor outcomes were performed in two general practitioner (GP) practices in a local service-development initiative. Patients were reviewed at joint clinics by primary and secondary care professionals. GPs also nominated patients for inclusion. Reviews were delivered to best standards of care including assessments of diagnosis, control, spirometry, self-management, education, medication, inhaler technique and smoking cessation support. Follow-up of routine clinical data collected at 9-months postclinic were compared with seasonally matched 9-months prior to integrated review. RESULTS: 82 patients were identified, 55 attended. 13 (23.6%) had their primary diagnosis changed. In comparison with the seasonally adjusted baseline period, in the 9-month follow-up there was an increase in inhaled corticosteroid prescriptions of 23.3%, a reduction in short-acting β(2)-agonist prescription of 33.3%, a reduction in acute respiratory exacerbations of 67.6%, in unscheduled GP surgery visits of 53.3% and acute respiratory hospital admissions reduced from 3 to 0. Only 4 patients (7.3%) required referral to secondary care. Health economic evaluation showed respiratory-related costs per patient reduced by £231.86. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with respiratory disease in this region at risk of suboptimal outcomes identified proactively and managed by an integrated team improved outcomes without the need for hospital referral. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5174798 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51747982017-01-10 Managing complex respiratory patients in the community: an evaluation of a pilot integrated respiratory care service Gillett, K Lippiett, K Astles, C Longstaff, J Orlando, R Lin, S X Powell, A Roberts, C Chauhan, A J Thomas, M Wilkinson, T M BMJ Open Respir Res Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease INTRODUCTION: In the UK, there is significant variation in respiratory care and outcomes. An integrated approach to the management of high-risk respiratory patients, incorporating specialist and primary care teams' expertise, is the basis for new integrated respiratory services designed to reduce this variation; however, this model needs evaluating. METHODS: To evaluate an integrated service managing high-risk respiratory patients, electronic searches for patients with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease at risk of poor outcomes were performed in two general practitioner (GP) practices in a local service-development initiative. Patients were reviewed at joint clinics by primary and secondary care professionals. GPs also nominated patients for inclusion. Reviews were delivered to best standards of care including assessments of diagnosis, control, spirometry, self-management, education, medication, inhaler technique and smoking cessation support. Follow-up of routine clinical data collected at 9-months postclinic were compared with seasonally matched 9-months prior to integrated review. RESULTS: 82 patients were identified, 55 attended. 13 (23.6%) had their primary diagnosis changed. In comparison with the seasonally adjusted baseline period, in the 9-month follow-up there was an increase in inhaled corticosteroid prescriptions of 23.3%, a reduction in short-acting β(2)-agonist prescription of 33.3%, a reduction in acute respiratory exacerbations of 67.6%, in unscheduled GP surgery visits of 53.3% and acute respiratory hospital admissions reduced from 3 to 0. Only 4 patients (7.3%) required referral to secondary care. Health economic evaluation showed respiratory-related costs per patient reduced by £231.86. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with respiratory disease in this region at risk of suboptimal outcomes identified proactively and managed by an integrated team improved outcomes without the need for hospital referral. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5174798/ /pubmed/28074134 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2016-000145 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Gillett, K Lippiett, K Astles, C Longstaff, J Orlando, R Lin, S X Powell, A Roberts, C Chauhan, A J Thomas, M Wilkinson, T M Managing complex respiratory patients in the community: an evaluation of a pilot integrated respiratory care service |
title | Managing complex respiratory patients in the community: an evaluation of a pilot integrated respiratory care service |
title_full | Managing complex respiratory patients in the community: an evaluation of a pilot integrated respiratory care service |
title_fullStr | Managing complex respiratory patients in the community: an evaluation of a pilot integrated respiratory care service |
title_full_unstemmed | Managing complex respiratory patients in the community: an evaluation of a pilot integrated respiratory care service |
title_short | Managing complex respiratory patients in the community: an evaluation of a pilot integrated respiratory care service |
title_sort | managing complex respiratory patients in the community: an evaluation of a pilot integrated respiratory care service |
topic | Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5174798/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28074134 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2016-000145 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gillettk managingcomplexrespiratorypatientsinthecommunityanevaluationofapilotintegratedrespiratorycareservice AT lippiettk managingcomplexrespiratorypatientsinthecommunityanevaluationofapilotintegratedrespiratorycareservice AT astlesc managingcomplexrespiratorypatientsinthecommunityanevaluationofapilotintegratedrespiratorycareservice AT longstaffj managingcomplexrespiratorypatientsinthecommunityanevaluationofapilotintegratedrespiratorycareservice AT orlandor managingcomplexrespiratorypatientsinthecommunityanevaluationofapilotintegratedrespiratorycareservice AT linsx managingcomplexrespiratorypatientsinthecommunityanevaluationofapilotintegratedrespiratorycareservice AT powella managingcomplexrespiratorypatientsinthecommunityanevaluationofapilotintegratedrespiratorycareservice AT robertsc managingcomplexrespiratorypatientsinthecommunityanevaluationofapilotintegratedrespiratorycareservice AT chauhanaj managingcomplexrespiratorypatientsinthecommunityanevaluationofapilotintegratedrespiratorycareservice AT thomasm managingcomplexrespiratorypatientsinthecommunityanevaluationofapilotintegratedrespiratorycareservice AT wilkinsontm managingcomplexrespiratorypatientsinthecommunityanevaluationofapilotintegratedrespiratorycareservice |