Cargando…
A quantitative comparison of micro-CT preparations in Dipteran flies
X-ray-based 3D-imaging techniques have gained fundamental significance in research areas ranging from taxonomy to bioengineering. There is demand for the characterisation of species-specific morphological adaptations, micro-CT (μCT) being the method of choice in small-scale animals. This has driven...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5175214/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28000717 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep39380 |
_version_ | 1782484616306753536 |
---|---|
author | Swart, Peter Wicklein, Martina Sykes, Dan Ahmed, Farah Krapp, Holger G. |
author_facet | Swart, Peter Wicklein, Martina Sykes, Dan Ahmed, Farah Krapp, Holger G. |
author_sort | Swart, Peter |
collection | PubMed |
description | X-ray-based 3D-imaging techniques have gained fundamental significance in research areas ranging from taxonomy to bioengineering. There is demand for the characterisation of species-specific morphological adaptations, micro-CT (μCT) being the method of choice in small-scale animals. This has driven the development of suitable staining techniques to improve absorption-based tissue contrast. A quantitative account on the limits of current staining protocols for preparing μCT specimen, however, is still missing. Here we present a study that quantifies results obtained by combining a variety of different contrast agents and fixative treatments that provides general guidance for μCT applications, particularly suitable for insect species. Using a blowfly model system (Calliphora), we enhanced effective spatial resolution and, in particular, optimised tissue contrast enabling semi-automated segmentation of soft and hard tissue from μCT data. We introduce a novel probabilistic measure of the contrast between tissues: PTC. Our results show that a strong iodine solution provides the greatest overall increase in tissue contrast, however phosphotungstic acid offers better inter-tissue discriminability. We further show that using paraformaldehyde as a fixative as opposed to ethanol, slows down the uptake of a staining solution by approximately a factor of two. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5175214 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51752142016-12-28 A quantitative comparison of micro-CT preparations in Dipteran flies Swart, Peter Wicklein, Martina Sykes, Dan Ahmed, Farah Krapp, Holger G. Sci Rep Article X-ray-based 3D-imaging techniques have gained fundamental significance in research areas ranging from taxonomy to bioengineering. There is demand for the characterisation of species-specific morphological adaptations, micro-CT (μCT) being the method of choice in small-scale animals. This has driven the development of suitable staining techniques to improve absorption-based tissue contrast. A quantitative account on the limits of current staining protocols for preparing μCT specimen, however, is still missing. Here we present a study that quantifies results obtained by combining a variety of different contrast agents and fixative treatments that provides general guidance for μCT applications, particularly suitable for insect species. Using a blowfly model system (Calliphora), we enhanced effective spatial resolution and, in particular, optimised tissue contrast enabling semi-automated segmentation of soft and hard tissue from μCT data. We introduce a novel probabilistic measure of the contrast between tissues: PTC. Our results show that a strong iodine solution provides the greatest overall increase in tissue contrast, however phosphotungstic acid offers better inter-tissue discriminability. We further show that using paraformaldehyde as a fixative as opposed to ethanol, slows down the uptake of a staining solution by approximately a factor of two. Nature Publishing Group 2016-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5175214/ /pubmed/28000717 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep39380 Text en Copyright © 2016, The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Article Swart, Peter Wicklein, Martina Sykes, Dan Ahmed, Farah Krapp, Holger G. A quantitative comparison of micro-CT preparations in Dipteran flies |
title | A quantitative comparison of micro-CT preparations in Dipteran flies |
title_full | A quantitative comparison of micro-CT preparations in Dipteran flies |
title_fullStr | A quantitative comparison of micro-CT preparations in Dipteran flies |
title_full_unstemmed | A quantitative comparison of micro-CT preparations in Dipteran flies |
title_short | A quantitative comparison of micro-CT preparations in Dipteran flies |
title_sort | quantitative comparison of micro-ct preparations in dipteran flies |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5175214/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28000717 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep39380 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT swartpeter aquantitativecomparisonofmicroctpreparationsindipteranflies AT wickleinmartina aquantitativecomparisonofmicroctpreparationsindipteranflies AT sykesdan aquantitativecomparisonofmicroctpreparationsindipteranflies AT ahmedfarah aquantitativecomparisonofmicroctpreparationsindipteranflies AT krappholgerg aquantitativecomparisonofmicroctpreparationsindipteranflies AT swartpeter quantitativecomparisonofmicroctpreparationsindipteranflies AT wickleinmartina quantitativecomparisonofmicroctpreparationsindipteranflies AT sykesdan quantitativecomparisonofmicroctpreparationsindipteranflies AT ahmedfarah quantitativecomparisonofmicroctpreparationsindipteranflies AT krappholgerg quantitativecomparisonofmicroctpreparationsindipteranflies |