Cargando…
A Twofold Comparison between Dual Cure Resin Modified Cement and Glass Ionomer Cement for Orthodontic Band Cementation
AIM: To test the solubility of dual cure resin modified resin cement in a food simulating solution and the shear bond strength compared to conventional Glass ionomer cement. MATERIALS AND METHOD: The materials tested were self-adhesive dual cure resin modified cement and Glass Ionomer (GIC). Twenty...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Institute of Immunobiology and Human Genetics
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5175525/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28028417 http://dx.doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2016.116 |
_version_ | 1782484669071097856 |
---|---|
author | Attar, Hanaa El Elhiny, Omnia Salem, Ghada Abdelrahman, Ahmed Attia, Mazen |
author_facet | Attar, Hanaa El Elhiny, Omnia Salem, Ghada Abdelrahman, Ahmed Attia, Mazen |
author_sort | Attar, Hanaa El |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: To test the solubility of dual cure resin modified resin cement in a food simulating solution and the shear bond strength compared to conventional Glass ionomer cement. MATERIALS AND METHOD: The materials tested were self-adhesive dual cure resin modified cement and Glass Ionomer (GIC). Twenty Teflon moulds were divided into two groups of tens. The first group was injected and packed with the modified resin cement, the second group was packed with GIC. To test the solubility, each mould was weighed before and after being placed in an analytical reagent for 30 days. The solubility was measured as the difference between the initial and final drying mass. To measure the Shear bond strength, 20 freshly extracted wisdom teeth were equally divided into two groups and embedded in self-cure acrylic resin. Four mm sections of stainless steel bands were cemented to the exposed buccal surfaces of teeth under a constant load of 500 g. Shear bond strength was measured using a computer controlled materials testing machine and the load required to deband the samples was recorded in Newtons. RESULTS: GIC showed significantly higher mean weight loss and an insignificant lower Shear bond strength, compared to dual cure resin Cement. CONCLUSION: It was found that dual cure resin modified cement was less soluble than glass ionomer cement and of comparable bond strength rendering it more useful clinically for orthodontic band cementation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5175525 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Institute of Immunobiology and Human Genetics |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51755252016-12-27 A Twofold Comparison between Dual Cure Resin Modified Cement and Glass Ionomer Cement for Orthodontic Band Cementation Attar, Hanaa El Elhiny, Omnia Salem, Ghada Abdelrahman, Ahmed Attia, Mazen Open Access Maced J Med Sci Stomatology AIM: To test the solubility of dual cure resin modified resin cement in a food simulating solution and the shear bond strength compared to conventional Glass ionomer cement. MATERIALS AND METHOD: The materials tested were self-adhesive dual cure resin modified cement and Glass Ionomer (GIC). Twenty Teflon moulds were divided into two groups of tens. The first group was injected and packed with the modified resin cement, the second group was packed with GIC. To test the solubility, each mould was weighed before and after being placed in an analytical reagent for 30 days. The solubility was measured as the difference between the initial and final drying mass. To measure the Shear bond strength, 20 freshly extracted wisdom teeth were equally divided into two groups and embedded in self-cure acrylic resin. Four mm sections of stainless steel bands were cemented to the exposed buccal surfaces of teeth under a constant load of 500 g. Shear bond strength was measured using a computer controlled materials testing machine and the load required to deband the samples was recorded in Newtons. RESULTS: GIC showed significantly higher mean weight loss and an insignificant lower Shear bond strength, compared to dual cure resin Cement. CONCLUSION: It was found that dual cure resin modified cement was less soluble than glass ionomer cement and of comparable bond strength rendering it more useful clinically for orthodontic band cementation. Institute of Immunobiology and Human Genetics 2016-12-15 2016-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5175525/ /pubmed/28028417 http://dx.doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2016.116 Text en Copyright: © 2016 Hanaa El Attar, Omnia Elhiny, Ghada Salem, Ahmed Abdelrahman, Mazen Attia. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/CC BY-NC/4.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0). |
spellingShingle | Stomatology Attar, Hanaa El Elhiny, Omnia Salem, Ghada Abdelrahman, Ahmed Attia, Mazen A Twofold Comparison between Dual Cure Resin Modified Cement and Glass Ionomer Cement for Orthodontic Band Cementation |
title | A Twofold Comparison between Dual Cure Resin Modified Cement and Glass Ionomer Cement for Orthodontic Band Cementation |
title_full | A Twofold Comparison between Dual Cure Resin Modified Cement and Glass Ionomer Cement for Orthodontic Band Cementation |
title_fullStr | A Twofold Comparison between Dual Cure Resin Modified Cement and Glass Ionomer Cement for Orthodontic Band Cementation |
title_full_unstemmed | A Twofold Comparison between Dual Cure Resin Modified Cement and Glass Ionomer Cement for Orthodontic Band Cementation |
title_short | A Twofold Comparison between Dual Cure Resin Modified Cement and Glass Ionomer Cement for Orthodontic Band Cementation |
title_sort | twofold comparison between dual cure resin modified cement and glass ionomer cement for orthodontic band cementation |
topic | Stomatology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5175525/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28028417 http://dx.doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2016.116 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT attarhanaael atwofoldcomparisonbetweendualcureresinmodifiedcementandglassionomercementfororthodonticbandcementation AT elhinyomnia atwofoldcomparisonbetweendualcureresinmodifiedcementandglassionomercementfororthodonticbandcementation AT salemghada atwofoldcomparisonbetweendualcureresinmodifiedcementandglassionomercementfororthodonticbandcementation AT abdelrahmanahmed atwofoldcomparisonbetweendualcureresinmodifiedcementandglassionomercementfororthodonticbandcementation AT attiamazen atwofoldcomparisonbetweendualcureresinmodifiedcementandglassionomercementfororthodonticbandcementation AT attarhanaael twofoldcomparisonbetweendualcureresinmodifiedcementandglassionomercementfororthodonticbandcementation AT elhinyomnia twofoldcomparisonbetweendualcureresinmodifiedcementandglassionomercementfororthodonticbandcementation AT salemghada twofoldcomparisonbetweendualcureresinmodifiedcementandglassionomercementfororthodonticbandcementation AT abdelrahmanahmed twofoldcomparisonbetweendualcureresinmodifiedcementandglassionomercementfororthodonticbandcementation AT attiamazen twofoldcomparisonbetweendualcureresinmodifiedcementandglassionomercementfororthodonticbandcementation |