Cargando…

A Twofold Comparison between Dual Cure Resin Modified Cement and Glass Ionomer Cement for Orthodontic Band Cementation

AIM: To test the solubility of dual cure resin modified resin cement in a food simulating solution and the shear bond strength compared to conventional Glass ionomer cement. MATERIALS AND METHOD: The materials tested were self-adhesive dual cure resin modified cement and Glass Ionomer (GIC). Twenty...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Attar, Hanaa El, Elhiny, Omnia, Salem, Ghada, Abdelrahman, Ahmed, Attia, Mazen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Institute of Immunobiology and Human Genetics 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5175525/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28028417
http://dx.doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2016.116
_version_ 1782484669071097856
author Attar, Hanaa El
Elhiny, Omnia
Salem, Ghada
Abdelrahman, Ahmed
Attia, Mazen
author_facet Attar, Hanaa El
Elhiny, Omnia
Salem, Ghada
Abdelrahman, Ahmed
Attia, Mazen
author_sort Attar, Hanaa El
collection PubMed
description AIM: To test the solubility of dual cure resin modified resin cement in a food simulating solution and the shear bond strength compared to conventional Glass ionomer cement. MATERIALS AND METHOD: The materials tested were self-adhesive dual cure resin modified cement and Glass Ionomer (GIC). Twenty Teflon moulds were divided into two groups of tens. The first group was injected and packed with the modified resin cement, the second group was packed with GIC. To test the solubility, each mould was weighed before and after being placed in an analytical reagent for 30 days. The solubility was measured as the difference between the initial and final drying mass. To measure the Shear bond strength, 20 freshly extracted wisdom teeth were equally divided into two groups and embedded in self-cure acrylic resin. Four mm sections of stainless steel bands were cemented to the exposed buccal surfaces of teeth under a constant load of 500 g. Shear bond strength was measured using a computer controlled materials testing machine and the load required to deband the samples was recorded in Newtons. RESULTS: GIC showed significantly higher mean weight loss and an insignificant lower Shear bond strength, compared to dual cure resin Cement. CONCLUSION: It was found that dual cure resin modified cement was less soluble than glass ionomer cement and of comparable bond strength rendering it more useful clinically for orthodontic band cementation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5175525
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Institute of Immunobiology and Human Genetics
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51755252016-12-27 A Twofold Comparison between Dual Cure Resin Modified Cement and Glass Ionomer Cement for Orthodontic Band Cementation Attar, Hanaa El Elhiny, Omnia Salem, Ghada Abdelrahman, Ahmed Attia, Mazen Open Access Maced J Med Sci Stomatology AIM: To test the solubility of dual cure resin modified resin cement in a food simulating solution and the shear bond strength compared to conventional Glass ionomer cement. MATERIALS AND METHOD: The materials tested were self-adhesive dual cure resin modified cement and Glass Ionomer (GIC). Twenty Teflon moulds were divided into two groups of tens. The first group was injected and packed with the modified resin cement, the second group was packed with GIC. To test the solubility, each mould was weighed before and after being placed in an analytical reagent for 30 days. The solubility was measured as the difference between the initial and final drying mass. To measure the Shear bond strength, 20 freshly extracted wisdom teeth were equally divided into two groups and embedded in self-cure acrylic resin. Four mm sections of stainless steel bands were cemented to the exposed buccal surfaces of teeth under a constant load of 500 g. Shear bond strength was measured using a computer controlled materials testing machine and the load required to deband the samples was recorded in Newtons. RESULTS: GIC showed significantly higher mean weight loss and an insignificant lower Shear bond strength, compared to dual cure resin Cement. CONCLUSION: It was found that dual cure resin modified cement was less soluble than glass ionomer cement and of comparable bond strength rendering it more useful clinically for orthodontic band cementation. Institute of Immunobiology and Human Genetics 2016-12-15 2016-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5175525/ /pubmed/28028417 http://dx.doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2016.116 Text en Copyright: © 2016 Hanaa El Attar, Omnia Elhiny, Ghada Salem, Ahmed Abdelrahman, Mazen Attia. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/CC BY-NC/4.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0).
spellingShingle Stomatology
Attar, Hanaa El
Elhiny, Omnia
Salem, Ghada
Abdelrahman, Ahmed
Attia, Mazen
A Twofold Comparison between Dual Cure Resin Modified Cement and Glass Ionomer Cement for Orthodontic Band Cementation
title A Twofold Comparison between Dual Cure Resin Modified Cement and Glass Ionomer Cement for Orthodontic Band Cementation
title_full A Twofold Comparison between Dual Cure Resin Modified Cement and Glass Ionomer Cement for Orthodontic Band Cementation
title_fullStr A Twofold Comparison between Dual Cure Resin Modified Cement and Glass Ionomer Cement for Orthodontic Band Cementation
title_full_unstemmed A Twofold Comparison between Dual Cure Resin Modified Cement and Glass Ionomer Cement for Orthodontic Band Cementation
title_short A Twofold Comparison between Dual Cure Resin Modified Cement and Glass Ionomer Cement for Orthodontic Band Cementation
title_sort twofold comparison between dual cure resin modified cement and glass ionomer cement for orthodontic band cementation
topic Stomatology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5175525/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28028417
http://dx.doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2016.116
work_keys_str_mv AT attarhanaael atwofoldcomparisonbetweendualcureresinmodifiedcementandglassionomercementfororthodonticbandcementation
AT elhinyomnia atwofoldcomparisonbetweendualcureresinmodifiedcementandglassionomercementfororthodonticbandcementation
AT salemghada atwofoldcomparisonbetweendualcureresinmodifiedcementandglassionomercementfororthodonticbandcementation
AT abdelrahmanahmed atwofoldcomparisonbetweendualcureresinmodifiedcementandglassionomercementfororthodonticbandcementation
AT attiamazen atwofoldcomparisonbetweendualcureresinmodifiedcementandglassionomercementfororthodonticbandcementation
AT attarhanaael twofoldcomparisonbetweendualcureresinmodifiedcementandglassionomercementfororthodonticbandcementation
AT elhinyomnia twofoldcomparisonbetweendualcureresinmodifiedcementandglassionomercementfororthodonticbandcementation
AT salemghada twofoldcomparisonbetweendualcureresinmodifiedcementandglassionomercementfororthodonticbandcementation
AT abdelrahmanahmed twofoldcomparisonbetweendualcureresinmodifiedcementandglassionomercementfororthodonticbandcementation
AT attiamazen twofoldcomparisonbetweendualcureresinmodifiedcementandglassionomercementfororthodonticbandcementation