Cargando…

Analysis of Anthrax Immune Globulin Intravenous with Antimicrobial Treatment in Injection Drug Users, Scotland, 2009–2010

We studied anthrax immune globulin intravenous (AIG-IV) use from a 2009–2010 outbreak of Bacillus anthracis soft tissue infection in injection drug users in Scotland, UK, and we compared findings from 15 AIG-IV recipients with findings from 28 nonrecipients. Death rates did not differ significantly...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cui, Xizhong, Nolen, Leisha D., Sun, Junfeng, Booth, Malcolm, Donaldson, Lindsay, Quinn, Conrad P., Boyer, Anne E., Hendricks, Katherine, Shadomy, Sean, Bothma, Pieter, Judd, Owen, McConnell, Paul, Bower, William A., Eichacker, Peter Q.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5176236/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27983504
http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid2301.160608
_version_ 1782484786265194496
author Cui, Xizhong
Nolen, Leisha D.
Sun, Junfeng
Booth, Malcolm
Donaldson, Lindsay
Quinn, Conrad P.
Boyer, Anne E.
Hendricks, Katherine
Shadomy, Sean
Bothma, Pieter
Judd, Owen
McConnell, Paul
Bower, William A.
Eichacker, Peter Q.
author_facet Cui, Xizhong
Nolen, Leisha D.
Sun, Junfeng
Booth, Malcolm
Donaldson, Lindsay
Quinn, Conrad P.
Boyer, Anne E.
Hendricks, Katherine
Shadomy, Sean
Bothma, Pieter
Judd, Owen
McConnell, Paul
Bower, William A.
Eichacker, Peter Q.
author_sort Cui, Xizhong
collection PubMed
description We studied anthrax immune globulin intravenous (AIG-IV) use from a 2009–2010 outbreak of Bacillus anthracis soft tissue infection in injection drug users in Scotland, UK, and we compared findings from 15 AIG-IV recipients with findings from 28 nonrecipients. Death rates did not differ significantly between recipients and nonrecipients (33% vs. 21%). However, whereas only 8 (27%) of 30 patients at low risk for death (admission sequential organ failure assessment score of 0–5) received AIG-IV, 7 (54%) of the 13 patients at high risk for death (sequential organ failure assessment score of 6–11) received treatment. AIG-IV recipients had surgery more often and, among survivors, had longer hospital stays than did nonrecipients. AIG-IV recipients were sicker than nonrecipients. This difference and the small number of higher risk patients confound assessment of AIG-IV effectiveness in this outbreak.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5176236
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51762362017-01-01 Analysis of Anthrax Immune Globulin Intravenous with Antimicrobial Treatment in Injection Drug Users, Scotland, 2009–2010 Cui, Xizhong Nolen, Leisha D. Sun, Junfeng Booth, Malcolm Donaldson, Lindsay Quinn, Conrad P. Boyer, Anne E. Hendricks, Katherine Shadomy, Sean Bothma, Pieter Judd, Owen McConnell, Paul Bower, William A. Eichacker, Peter Q. Emerg Infect Dis Research We studied anthrax immune globulin intravenous (AIG-IV) use from a 2009–2010 outbreak of Bacillus anthracis soft tissue infection in injection drug users in Scotland, UK, and we compared findings from 15 AIG-IV recipients with findings from 28 nonrecipients. Death rates did not differ significantly between recipients and nonrecipients (33% vs. 21%). However, whereas only 8 (27%) of 30 patients at low risk for death (admission sequential organ failure assessment score of 0–5) received AIG-IV, 7 (54%) of the 13 patients at high risk for death (sequential organ failure assessment score of 6–11) received treatment. AIG-IV recipients had surgery more often and, among survivors, had longer hospital stays than did nonrecipients. AIG-IV recipients were sicker than nonrecipients. This difference and the small number of higher risk patients confound assessment of AIG-IV effectiveness in this outbreak. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2017-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5176236/ /pubmed/27983504 http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid2301.160608 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is a publication of the U.S. Government. This publication is in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from this work may be reprinted freely. Use of these materials should be properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Cui, Xizhong
Nolen, Leisha D.
Sun, Junfeng
Booth, Malcolm
Donaldson, Lindsay
Quinn, Conrad P.
Boyer, Anne E.
Hendricks, Katherine
Shadomy, Sean
Bothma, Pieter
Judd, Owen
McConnell, Paul
Bower, William A.
Eichacker, Peter Q.
Analysis of Anthrax Immune Globulin Intravenous with Antimicrobial Treatment in Injection Drug Users, Scotland, 2009–2010
title Analysis of Anthrax Immune Globulin Intravenous with Antimicrobial Treatment in Injection Drug Users, Scotland, 2009–2010
title_full Analysis of Anthrax Immune Globulin Intravenous with Antimicrobial Treatment in Injection Drug Users, Scotland, 2009–2010
title_fullStr Analysis of Anthrax Immune Globulin Intravenous with Antimicrobial Treatment in Injection Drug Users, Scotland, 2009–2010
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of Anthrax Immune Globulin Intravenous with Antimicrobial Treatment in Injection Drug Users, Scotland, 2009–2010
title_short Analysis of Anthrax Immune Globulin Intravenous with Antimicrobial Treatment in Injection Drug Users, Scotland, 2009–2010
title_sort analysis of anthrax immune globulin intravenous with antimicrobial treatment in injection drug users, scotland, 2009–2010
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5176236/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27983504
http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid2301.160608
work_keys_str_mv AT cuixizhong analysisofanthraximmuneglobulinintravenouswithantimicrobialtreatmentininjectiondrugusersscotland20092010
AT nolenleishad analysisofanthraximmuneglobulinintravenouswithantimicrobialtreatmentininjectiondrugusersscotland20092010
AT sunjunfeng analysisofanthraximmuneglobulinintravenouswithantimicrobialtreatmentininjectiondrugusersscotland20092010
AT boothmalcolm analysisofanthraximmuneglobulinintravenouswithantimicrobialtreatmentininjectiondrugusersscotland20092010
AT donaldsonlindsay analysisofanthraximmuneglobulinintravenouswithantimicrobialtreatmentininjectiondrugusersscotland20092010
AT quinnconradp analysisofanthraximmuneglobulinintravenouswithantimicrobialtreatmentininjectiondrugusersscotland20092010
AT boyerannee analysisofanthraximmuneglobulinintravenouswithantimicrobialtreatmentininjectiondrugusersscotland20092010
AT hendrickskatherine analysisofanthraximmuneglobulinintravenouswithantimicrobialtreatmentininjectiondrugusersscotland20092010
AT shadomysean analysisofanthraximmuneglobulinintravenouswithantimicrobialtreatmentininjectiondrugusersscotland20092010
AT bothmapieter analysisofanthraximmuneglobulinintravenouswithantimicrobialtreatmentininjectiondrugusersscotland20092010
AT juddowen analysisofanthraximmuneglobulinintravenouswithantimicrobialtreatmentininjectiondrugusersscotland20092010
AT mcconnellpaul analysisofanthraximmuneglobulinintravenouswithantimicrobialtreatmentininjectiondrugusersscotland20092010
AT bowerwilliama analysisofanthraximmuneglobulinintravenouswithantimicrobialtreatmentininjectiondrugusersscotland20092010
AT eichackerpeterq analysisofanthraximmuneglobulinintravenouswithantimicrobialtreatmentininjectiondrugusersscotland20092010