Cargando…
Analysis of Anthrax Immune Globulin Intravenous with Antimicrobial Treatment in Injection Drug Users, Scotland, 2009–2010
We studied anthrax immune globulin intravenous (AIG-IV) use from a 2009–2010 outbreak of Bacillus anthracis soft tissue infection in injection drug users in Scotland, UK, and we compared findings from 15 AIG-IV recipients with findings from 28 nonrecipients. Death rates did not differ significantly...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5176236/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27983504 http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid2301.160608 |
_version_ | 1782484786265194496 |
---|---|
author | Cui, Xizhong Nolen, Leisha D. Sun, Junfeng Booth, Malcolm Donaldson, Lindsay Quinn, Conrad P. Boyer, Anne E. Hendricks, Katherine Shadomy, Sean Bothma, Pieter Judd, Owen McConnell, Paul Bower, William A. Eichacker, Peter Q. |
author_facet | Cui, Xizhong Nolen, Leisha D. Sun, Junfeng Booth, Malcolm Donaldson, Lindsay Quinn, Conrad P. Boyer, Anne E. Hendricks, Katherine Shadomy, Sean Bothma, Pieter Judd, Owen McConnell, Paul Bower, William A. Eichacker, Peter Q. |
author_sort | Cui, Xizhong |
collection | PubMed |
description | We studied anthrax immune globulin intravenous (AIG-IV) use from a 2009–2010 outbreak of Bacillus anthracis soft tissue infection in injection drug users in Scotland, UK, and we compared findings from 15 AIG-IV recipients with findings from 28 nonrecipients. Death rates did not differ significantly between recipients and nonrecipients (33% vs. 21%). However, whereas only 8 (27%) of 30 patients at low risk for death (admission sequential organ failure assessment score of 0–5) received AIG-IV, 7 (54%) of the 13 patients at high risk for death (sequential organ failure assessment score of 6–11) received treatment. AIG-IV recipients had surgery more often and, among survivors, had longer hospital stays than did nonrecipients. AIG-IV recipients were sicker than nonrecipients. This difference and the small number of higher risk patients confound assessment of AIG-IV effectiveness in this outbreak. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5176236 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Centers for Disease Control and Prevention |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51762362017-01-01 Analysis of Anthrax Immune Globulin Intravenous with Antimicrobial Treatment in Injection Drug Users, Scotland, 2009–2010 Cui, Xizhong Nolen, Leisha D. Sun, Junfeng Booth, Malcolm Donaldson, Lindsay Quinn, Conrad P. Boyer, Anne E. Hendricks, Katherine Shadomy, Sean Bothma, Pieter Judd, Owen McConnell, Paul Bower, William A. Eichacker, Peter Q. Emerg Infect Dis Research We studied anthrax immune globulin intravenous (AIG-IV) use from a 2009–2010 outbreak of Bacillus anthracis soft tissue infection in injection drug users in Scotland, UK, and we compared findings from 15 AIG-IV recipients with findings from 28 nonrecipients. Death rates did not differ significantly between recipients and nonrecipients (33% vs. 21%). However, whereas only 8 (27%) of 30 patients at low risk for death (admission sequential organ failure assessment score of 0–5) received AIG-IV, 7 (54%) of the 13 patients at high risk for death (sequential organ failure assessment score of 6–11) received treatment. AIG-IV recipients had surgery more often and, among survivors, had longer hospital stays than did nonrecipients. AIG-IV recipients were sicker than nonrecipients. This difference and the small number of higher risk patients confound assessment of AIG-IV effectiveness in this outbreak. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2017-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5176236/ /pubmed/27983504 http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid2301.160608 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is a publication of the U.S. Government. This publication is in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from this work may be reprinted freely. Use of these materials should be properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Cui, Xizhong Nolen, Leisha D. Sun, Junfeng Booth, Malcolm Donaldson, Lindsay Quinn, Conrad P. Boyer, Anne E. Hendricks, Katherine Shadomy, Sean Bothma, Pieter Judd, Owen McConnell, Paul Bower, William A. Eichacker, Peter Q. Analysis of Anthrax Immune Globulin Intravenous with Antimicrobial Treatment in Injection Drug Users, Scotland, 2009–2010 |
title | Analysis of Anthrax Immune Globulin Intravenous with Antimicrobial Treatment in Injection Drug Users, Scotland, 2009–2010 |
title_full | Analysis of Anthrax Immune Globulin Intravenous with Antimicrobial Treatment in Injection Drug Users, Scotland, 2009–2010 |
title_fullStr | Analysis of Anthrax Immune Globulin Intravenous with Antimicrobial Treatment in Injection Drug Users, Scotland, 2009–2010 |
title_full_unstemmed | Analysis of Anthrax Immune Globulin Intravenous with Antimicrobial Treatment in Injection Drug Users, Scotland, 2009–2010 |
title_short | Analysis of Anthrax Immune Globulin Intravenous with Antimicrobial Treatment in Injection Drug Users, Scotland, 2009–2010 |
title_sort | analysis of anthrax immune globulin intravenous with antimicrobial treatment in injection drug users, scotland, 2009–2010 |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5176236/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27983504 http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid2301.160608 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cuixizhong analysisofanthraximmuneglobulinintravenouswithantimicrobialtreatmentininjectiondrugusersscotland20092010 AT nolenleishad analysisofanthraximmuneglobulinintravenouswithantimicrobialtreatmentininjectiondrugusersscotland20092010 AT sunjunfeng analysisofanthraximmuneglobulinintravenouswithantimicrobialtreatmentininjectiondrugusersscotland20092010 AT boothmalcolm analysisofanthraximmuneglobulinintravenouswithantimicrobialtreatmentininjectiondrugusersscotland20092010 AT donaldsonlindsay analysisofanthraximmuneglobulinintravenouswithantimicrobialtreatmentininjectiondrugusersscotland20092010 AT quinnconradp analysisofanthraximmuneglobulinintravenouswithantimicrobialtreatmentininjectiondrugusersscotland20092010 AT boyerannee analysisofanthraximmuneglobulinintravenouswithantimicrobialtreatmentininjectiondrugusersscotland20092010 AT hendrickskatherine analysisofanthraximmuneglobulinintravenouswithantimicrobialtreatmentininjectiondrugusersscotland20092010 AT shadomysean analysisofanthraximmuneglobulinintravenouswithantimicrobialtreatmentininjectiondrugusersscotland20092010 AT bothmapieter analysisofanthraximmuneglobulinintravenouswithantimicrobialtreatmentininjectiondrugusersscotland20092010 AT juddowen analysisofanthraximmuneglobulinintravenouswithantimicrobialtreatmentininjectiondrugusersscotland20092010 AT mcconnellpaul analysisofanthraximmuneglobulinintravenouswithantimicrobialtreatmentininjectiondrugusersscotland20092010 AT bowerwilliama analysisofanthraximmuneglobulinintravenouswithantimicrobialtreatmentininjectiondrugusersscotland20092010 AT eichackerpeterq analysisofanthraximmuneglobulinintravenouswithantimicrobialtreatmentininjectiondrugusersscotland20092010 |