Cargando…

Inactivation of Salmonella spp. and Listeria spp. by Palmitic, Stearic, and Oleic Acid Sophorolipids and Thiamine Dilauryl Sulfate

Food contaminated with human pathogens, such as Salmonella spp. and Listeria monocytogenes, frequently causes outbreaks of foodborne illness. Consumer concern over the use of synthesized antimicrobials to enhance microbial food safety has led to a search of natural alternatives. The objectives of th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Xuejie, Ashby, Richard, Solaiman, Daniel K. Y., Uknalis, Joseph, Fan, Xuetong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5177657/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28066390
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.02076
_version_ 1782485033301311488
author Zhang, Xuejie
Ashby, Richard
Solaiman, Daniel K. Y.
Uknalis, Joseph
Fan, Xuetong
author_facet Zhang, Xuejie
Ashby, Richard
Solaiman, Daniel K. Y.
Uknalis, Joseph
Fan, Xuetong
author_sort Zhang, Xuejie
collection PubMed
description Food contaminated with human pathogens, such as Salmonella spp. and Listeria monocytogenes, frequently causes outbreaks of foodborne illness. Consumer concern over the use of synthesized antimicrobials to enhance microbial food safety has led to a search of natural alternatives. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the antimicrobial activity of various types of sophorolipids (SLs) and thiamine dilauryl sulfate (TDS) against pathogenic Salmonella spp. and Listeria spp. Both free and lactonic forms of SLs were synthesized from Candida bombicola using palmitic, stearic, and oleic acids as co-feedstocks. TDS and purified SLs were used to treat cocktails of Salmonella spp. and Listeria spp. Results showed that lactonic SLs had higher antimicrobial activity than the free-acid form, and Gram-positive Listeria spp. were more susceptible to SLs and TDS than Gram-negative Salmonella spp. Listeria populations were reduced from an initial concentration of 7.2 log CFU/mL to a non-detectible level within a 1 min treatment of 0.1% (w/v) lactonic SLs and TDS in the presence of 20% ethanol, which itself did not significantly reduce the populations. There were no significant differences in the antimicrobial efficacy among palmitic, stearic, and oleic acid-based SLs against Salmonella or Listeria spp. Ethanol was utilized to improve the antimicrobial activity of free-acid SLs against Gram-negative bacteria. In general, TDS was more effective than the SLs against Salmonella and Listeria spp. scanning electron microscopy and transmission electron microscopy images showed that SLs and TDS damaged Listeria cell membranes and resulted in cell lysis. Overall, our results demonstrated that SLs and TDS in the presence of ethanol can be used to inactivate foodborne pathogens, especially Gram-positive bacteria.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5177657
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51776572017-01-06 Inactivation of Salmonella spp. and Listeria spp. by Palmitic, Stearic, and Oleic Acid Sophorolipids and Thiamine Dilauryl Sulfate Zhang, Xuejie Ashby, Richard Solaiman, Daniel K. Y. Uknalis, Joseph Fan, Xuetong Front Microbiol Microbiology Food contaminated with human pathogens, such as Salmonella spp. and Listeria monocytogenes, frequently causes outbreaks of foodborne illness. Consumer concern over the use of synthesized antimicrobials to enhance microbial food safety has led to a search of natural alternatives. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the antimicrobial activity of various types of sophorolipids (SLs) and thiamine dilauryl sulfate (TDS) against pathogenic Salmonella spp. and Listeria spp. Both free and lactonic forms of SLs were synthesized from Candida bombicola using palmitic, stearic, and oleic acids as co-feedstocks. TDS and purified SLs were used to treat cocktails of Salmonella spp. and Listeria spp. Results showed that lactonic SLs had higher antimicrobial activity than the free-acid form, and Gram-positive Listeria spp. were more susceptible to SLs and TDS than Gram-negative Salmonella spp. Listeria populations were reduced from an initial concentration of 7.2 log CFU/mL to a non-detectible level within a 1 min treatment of 0.1% (w/v) lactonic SLs and TDS in the presence of 20% ethanol, which itself did not significantly reduce the populations. There were no significant differences in the antimicrobial efficacy among palmitic, stearic, and oleic acid-based SLs against Salmonella or Listeria spp. Ethanol was utilized to improve the antimicrobial activity of free-acid SLs against Gram-negative bacteria. In general, TDS was more effective than the SLs against Salmonella and Listeria spp. scanning electron microscopy and transmission electron microscopy images showed that SLs and TDS damaged Listeria cell membranes and resulted in cell lysis. Overall, our results demonstrated that SLs and TDS in the presence of ethanol can be used to inactivate foodborne pathogens, especially Gram-positive bacteria. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5177657/ /pubmed/28066390 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.02076 Text en Copyright © 2016 Zhang, Ashby, Solaiman, Uknalis and Fan. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Microbiology
Zhang, Xuejie
Ashby, Richard
Solaiman, Daniel K. Y.
Uknalis, Joseph
Fan, Xuetong
Inactivation of Salmonella spp. and Listeria spp. by Palmitic, Stearic, and Oleic Acid Sophorolipids and Thiamine Dilauryl Sulfate
title Inactivation of Salmonella spp. and Listeria spp. by Palmitic, Stearic, and Oleic Acid Sophorolipids and Thiamine Dilauryl Sulfate
title_full Inactivation of Salmonella spp. and Listeria spp. by Palmitic, Stearic, and Oleic Acid Sophorolipids and Thiamine Dilauryl Sulfate
title_fullStr Inactivation of Salmonella spp. and Listeria spp. by Palmitic, Stearic, and Oleic Acid Sophorolipids and Thiamine Dilauryl Sulfate
title_full_unstemmed Inactivation of Salmonella spp. and Listeria spp. by Palmitic, Stearic, and Oleic Acid Sophorolipids and Thiamine Dilauryl Sulfate
title_short Inactivation of Salmonella spp. and Listeria spp. by Palmitic, Stearic, and Oleic Acid Sophorolipids and Thiamine Dilauryl Sulfate
title_sort inactivation of salmonella spp. and listeria spp. by palmitic, stearic, and oleic acid sophorolipids and thiamine dilauryl sulfate
topic Microbiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5177657/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28066390
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.02076
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangxuejie inactivationofsalmonellasppandlisteriasppbypalmiticstearicandoleicacidsophorolipidsandthiaminedilaurylsulfate
AT ashbyrichard inactivationofsalmonellasppandlisteriasppbypalmiticstearicandoleicacidsophorolipidsandthiaminedilaurylsulfate
AT solaimandanielky inactivationofsalmonellasppandlisteriasppbypalmiticstearicandoleicacidsophorolipidsandthiaminedilaurylsulfate
AT uknalisjoseph inactivationofsalmonellasppandlisteriasppbypalmiticstearicandoleicacidsophorolipidsandthiaminedilaurylsulfate
AT fanxuetong inactivationofsalmonellasppandlisteriasppbypalmiticstearicandoleicacidsophorolipidsandthiaminedilaurylsulfate