Cargando…

Assessment of turbulent viscous stress using ICOSA 4D Flow MRI for prediction of hemodynamic blood damage

Flow-induced blood damage plays an important role in determining the hemodynamic impact of abnormal blood flow, but quantifying of these effects, which are dominated by shear stresses in highly fluctuating turbulent flow, has not been feasible. This study evaluated the novel application of turbulenc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ha, Hojin, Lantz, Jonas, Haraldsson, Henrik, Casas, Belen, Ziegler, Magnus, Karlsson, Matts, Saloner, David, Dyverfeldt, Petter, Ebbers, Tino
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5177919/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28004789
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep39773
_version_ 1782485080414879744
author Ha, Hojin
Lantz, Jonas
Haraldsson, Henrik
Casas, Belen
Ziegler, Magnus
Karlsson, Matts
Saloner, David
Dyverfeldt, Petter
Ebbers, Tino
author_facet Ha, Hojin
Lantz, Jonas
Haraldsson, Henrik
Casas, Belen
Ziegler, Magnus
Karlsson, Matts
Saloner, David
Dyverfeldt, Petter
Ebbers, Tino
author_sort Ha, Hojin
collection PubMed
description Flow-induced blood damage plays an important role in determining the hemodynamic impact of abnormal blood flow, but quantifying of these effects, which are dominated by shear stresses in highly fluctuating turbulent flow, has not been feasible. This study evaluated the novel application of turbulence tensor measurements using simulated 4D Flow MRI data with six-directional velocity encoding for assessing hemodynamic stresses and corresponding blood damage index (BDI) in stenotic turbulent blood flow. The results showed that 4D Flow MRI underestimates the maximum principal shear stress of laminar viscous stress (PLVS), and overestimates the maximum principal shear stress of Reynolds stress (PRSS) with increasing voxel size. PLVS and PRSS were also overestimated by about 1.2 and 4.6 times at medium signal to noise ratio (SNR) = 20. In contrast, the square sum of the turbulent viscous shear stress (TVSS), which is used for blood damage index (BDI) estimation, was not severely affected by SNR and voxel size. The square sum of TVSS and the BDI at SNR >20 were underestimated by less than 1% and 10%, respectively. In conclusion, this study demonstrated the feasibility of 4D Flow MRI based quantification of TVSS and BDI which are closely linked to blood damage.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5177919
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51779192016-12-29 Assessment of turbulent viscous stress using ICOSA 4D Flow MRI for prediction of hemodynamic blood damage Ha, Hojin Lantz, Jonas Haraldsson, Henrik Casas, Belen Ziegler, Magnus Karlsson, Matts Saloner, David Dyverfeldt, Petter Ebbers, Tino Sci Rep Article Flow-induced blood damage plays an important role in determining the hemodynamic impact of abnormal blood flow, but quantifying of these effects, which are dominated by shear stresses in highly fluctuating turbulent flow, has not been feasible. This study evaluated the novel application of turbulence tensor measurements using simulated 4D Flow MRI data with six-directional velocity encoding for assessing hemodynamic stresses and corresponding blood damage index (BDI) in stenotic turbulent blood flow. The results showed that 4D Flow MRI underestimates the maximum principal shear stress of laminar viscous stress (PLVS), and overestimates the maximum principal shear stress of Reynolds stress (PRSS) with increasing voxel size. PLVS and PRSS were also overestimated by about 1.2 and 4.6 times at medium signal to noise ratio (SNR) = 20. In contrast, the square sum of the turbulent viscous shear stress (TVSS), which is used for blood damage index (BDI) estimation, was not severely affected by SNR and voxel size. The square sum of TVSS and the BDI at SNR >20 were underestimated by less than 1% and 10%, respectively. In conclusion, this study demonstrated the feasibility of 4D Flow MRI based quantification of TVSS and BDI which are closely linked to blood damage. Nature Publishing Group 2016-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5177919/ /pubmed/28004789 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep39773 Text en Copyright © 2016, The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Ha, Hojin
Lantz, Jonas
Haraldsson, Henrik
Casas, Belen
Ziegler, Magnus
Karlsson, Matts
Saloner, David
Dyverfeldt, Petter
Ebbers, Tino
Assessment of turbulent viscous stress using ICOSA 4D Flow MRI for prediction of hemodynamic blood damage
title Assessment of turbulent viscous stress using ICOSA 4D Flow MRI for prediction of hemodynamic blood damage
title_full Assessment of turbulent viscous stress using ICOSA 4D Flow MRI for prediction of hemodynamic blood damage
title_fullStr Assessment of turbulent viscous stress using ICOSA 4D Flow MRI for prediction of hemodynamic blood damage
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of turbulent viscous stress using ICOSA 4D Flow MRI for prediction of hemodynamic blood damage
title_short Assessment of turbulent viscous stress using ICOSA 4D Flow MRI for prediction of hemodynamic blood damage
title_sort assessment of turbulent viscous stress using icosa 4d flow mri for prediction of hemodynamic blood damage
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5177919/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28004789
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep39773
work_keys_str_mv AT hahojin assessmentofturbulentviscousstressusingicosa4dflowmriforpredictionofhemodynamicblooddamage
AT lantzjonas assessmentofturbulentviscousstressusingicosa4dflowmriforpredictionofhemodynamicblooddamage
AT haraldssonhenrik assessmentofturbulentviscousstressusingicosa4dflowmriforpredictionofhemodynamicblooddamage
AT casasbelen assessmentofturbulentviscousstressusingicosa4dflowmriforpredictionofhemodynamicblooddamage
AT zieglermagnus assessmentofturbulentviscousstressusingicosa4dflowmriforpredictionofhemodynamicblooddamage
AT karlssonmatts assessmentofturbulentviscousstressusingicosa4dflowmriforpredictionofhemodynamicblooddamage
AT salonerdavid assessmentofturbulentviscousstressusingicosa4dflowmriforpredictionofhemodynamicblooddamage
AT dyverfeldtpetter assessmentofturbulentviscousstressusingicosa4dflowmriforpredictionofhemodynamicblooddamage
AT ebberstino assessmentofturbulentviscousstressusingicosa4dflowmriforpredictionofhemodynamicblooddamage