Cargando…

Student-led objective tutorials in Pharmacology: An interventional study

OBJECTIVES: Students learn in a better way if they are involved in active learning. Hence, the study was designed to introduce student-led objective tutorials (SLOTs) as an alternative to conventional tutorials (CTs) in pharmacology and to compare SLOT and CT on outcomes such as improved score in te...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sukhlecha, Anupama, Jadav, Shilpa P., Gosai, Tushar R., Balusamy, Divakar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5178064/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28031616
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0253-7613.193310
_version_ 1782485105591189504
author Sukhlecha, Anupama
Jadav, Shilpa P.
Gosai, Tushar R.
Balusamy, Divakar
author_facet Sukhlecha, Anupama
Jadav, Shilpa P.
Gosai, Tushar R.
Balusamy, Divakar
author_sort Sukhlecha, Anupama
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Students learn in a better way if they are involved in active learning. Hence, the study was designed to introduce student-led objective tutorials (SLOTs) as an alternative to conventional tutorials (CTs) in pharmacology and to compare SLOT and CT on outcomes such as improved score in tests, active involvement of students, and faculty requirement of each. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Didactic lectures taken on a topic in pharmacology were followed by a preintervention test for a batch of the 2(nd) year medical undergraduates. They were allotted either in SLOT or CT group. For a SLOT session, students of Group A (interventional group) were divided into teams and each team prepared five multiple choice questions on the given topic in PowerPoint format, which were presented to other teams and audience. The proceedings were facilitated by two lecturers. Group B undertook CT (controls). A postintervention test was then taken for both groups. Feedback was sought from students and teachers on SLOT. RESULTS: The total marks for the test were 20. The mean marks in Group A improved by 31% (from 5.1 to 11.2). In Group B, they improved by 11% (from 5 to 7.2). Academic performance following SLOT was better than CT. Students (63%) favored SLOT as it stimulated their interest in the topic, improved self-learning skills, and teamwork. The teachers also favored SLOT for similar reasons. CONCLUSION: SLOT leads to greater satisfaction and better performance in tests. SLOT is an effective alternative to CT to promote active learning among students through group work. It helps overcome the logistic difficulties due to faculty shortage.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5178064
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51780642016-12-28 Student-led objective tutorials in Pharmacology: An interventional study Sukhlecha, Anupama Jadav, Shilpa P. Gosai, Tushar R. Balusamy, Divakar Indian J Pharmacol Short Communication OBJECTIVES: Students learn in a better way if they are involved in active learning. Hence, the study was designed to introduce student-led objective tutorials (SLOTs) as an alternative to conventional tutorials (CTs) in pharmacology and to compare SLOT and CT on outcomes such as improved score in tests, active involvement of students, and faculty requirement of each. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Didactic lectures taken on a topic in pharmacology were followed by a preintervention test for a batch of the 2(nd) year medical undergraduates. They were allotted either in SLOT or CT group. For a SLOT session, students of Group A (interventional group) were divided into teams and each team prepared five multiple choice questions on the given topic in PowerPoint format, which were presented to other teams and audience. The proceedings were facilitated by two lecturers. Group B undertook CT (controls). A postintervention test was then taken for both groups. Feedback was sought from students and teachers on SLOT. RESULTS: The total marks for the test were 20. The mean marks in Group A improved by 31% (from 5.1 to 11.2). In Group B, they improved by 11% (from 5 to 7.2). Academic performance following SLOT was better than CT. Students (63%) favored SLOT as it stimulated their interest in the topic, improved self-learning skills, and teamwork. The teachers also favored SLOT for similar reasons. CONCLUSION: SLOT leads to greater satisfaction and better performance in tests. SLOT is an effective alternative to CT to promote active learning among students through group work. It helps overcome the logistic difficulties due to faculty shortage. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5178064/ /pubmed/28031616 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0253-7613.193310 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Pharmacology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Short Communication
Sukhlecha, Anupama
Jadav, Shilpa P.
Gosai, Tushar R.
Balusamy, Divakar
Student-led objective tutorials in Pharmacology: An interventional study
title Student-led objective tutorials in Pharmacology: An interventional study
title_full Student-led objective tutorials in Pharmacology: An interventional study
title_fullStr Student-led objective tutorials in Pharmacology: An interventional study
title_full_unstemmed Student-led objective tutorials in Pharmacology: An interventional study
title_short Student-led objective tutorials in Pharmacology: An interventional study
title_sort student-led objective tutorials in pharmacology: an interventional study
topic Short Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5178064/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28031616
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0253-7613.193310
work_keys_str_mv AT sukhlechaanupama studentledobjectivetutorialsinpharmacologyaninterventionalstudy
AT jadavshilpap studentledobjectivetutorialsinpharmacologyaninterventionalstudy
AT gosaitusharr studentledobjectivetutorialsinpharmacologyaninterventionalstudy
AT balusamydivakar studentledobjectivetutorialsinpharmacologyaninterventionalstudy