Cargando…

Lifetime body size and estrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer risk in the California Teachers Study cohort

BACKGROUND: Obesity is a public health epidemic and an important breast cancer risk factor. The relationship between interrelated body measurements is complex and most studies fail to account for this complexity. We identified key aspects of body size which jointly, over the life-course (since adole...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Horn-Ross, Pamela L., Canchola, Alison J., Bernstein, Leslie, Neuhausen, Susan L., Nelson, David O., Reynolds, Peggy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5178085/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28003027
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13058-016-0790-5
_version_ 1782485110327607296
author Horn-Ross, Pamela L.
Canchola, Alison J.
Bernstein, Leslie
Neuhausen, Susan L.
Nelson, David O.
Reynolds, Peggy
author_facet Horn-Ross, Pamela L.
Canchola, Alison J.
Bernstein, Leslie
Neuhausen, Susan L.
Nelson, David O.
Reynolds, Peggy
author_sort Horn-Ross, Pamela L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Obesity is a public health epidemic and an important breast cancer risk factor. The relationship between interrelated body measurements is complex and most studies fail to account for this complexity. We identified key aspects of body size which jointly, over the life-course (since adolescence), are associated with estrogen-receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer risk. METHODS: Among 109,862 women participating in the California Teachers Study cohort, 3844 were diagnosed with invasive ER+ breast cancer between 1997–1998 and December 2011. Based on validated self-reported height and weight at age 18, baseline, and 10-year follow up and waist circumference at 2-year and 10-year follow up, we identified 16 a priori body-size phenotypes. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models provided estimates of hazard rate ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Premenopausal breast cancer was influenced by adolescent, but not adult, body size (HR = 0.51, 95% CI 0.31–0.86 for body mass index (BMI; kg/m(2)) ≥25 vs <20 at age 18). Among postmenopausal women currently using hormone therapy, only those with the greatest body size had increased breast cancer risk (HR = 1.36, 95% CI 1.13–1.64 for height ≥67 inches and adult BMI ≥25 vs height <67). Among postmenopausal women not currently using hormone therapy, the relationship between body size and risk was complex, with the largest effects of adiposity among short women. Among short women, those with gluteal adiposity (HR = 2.70, 95% CI 1.77–4.10) and those who continued to gain weight throughout adulthood (HR = 2.57, 95% CI 1.60–4.12) were at greatest risk, whereas those who had been overweight/obese since adolescence were not at increased risk (HR = 1.33, 95% CI 0.84–2.10). Height was associated with a small increased risk, with borderline statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Considering absolute body mass in adolescence and at two points in adulthood, dynamic changes in adiposity over time, and body fat distribution, we identified obesity phenotypes associated with ER+ breast cancer risk. Our approach more clearly identifies specific risk groups than do analyses that evaluate similar measures separately. These findings may aid in improving risk prediction models and developing targeted interventions, and may clarify inconsistent findings across studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5178085
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51780852016-12-28 Lifetime body size and estrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer risk in the California Teachers Study cohort Horn-Ross, Pamela L. Canchola, Alison J. Bernstein, Leslie Neuhausen, Susan L. Nelson, David O. Reynolds, Peggy Breast Cancer Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Obesity is a public health epidemic and an important breast cancer risk factor. The relationship between interrelated body measurements is complex and most studies fail to account for this complexity. We identified key aspects of body size which jointly, over the life-course (since adolescence), are associated with estrogen-receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer risk. METHODS: Among 109,862 women participating in the California Teachers Study cohort, 3844 were diagnosed with invasive ER+ breast cancer between 1997–1998 and December 2011. Based on validated self-reported height and weight at age 18, baseline, and 10-year follow up and waist circumference at 2-year and 10-year follow up, we identified 16 a priori body-size phenotypes. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models provided estimates of hazard rate ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Premenopausal breast cancer was influenced by adolescent, but not adult, body size (HR = 0.51, 95% CI 0.31–0.86 for body mass index (BMI; kg/m(2)) ≥25 vs <20 at age 18). Among postmenopausal women currently using hormone therapy, only those with the greatest body size had increased breast cancer risk (HR = 1.36, 95% CI 1.13–1.64 for height ≥67 inches and adult BMI ≥25 vs height <67). Among postmenopausal women not currently using hormone therapy, the relationship between body size and risk was complex, with the largest effects of adiposity among short women. Among short women, those with gluteal adiposity (HR = 2.70, 95% CI 1.77–4.10) and those who continued to gain weight throughout adulthood (HR = 2.57, 95% CI 1.60–4.12) were at greatest risk, whereas those who had been overweight/obese since adolescence were not at increased risk (HR = 1.33, 95% CI 0.84–2.10). Height was associated with a small increased risk, with borderline statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Considering absolute body mass in adolescence and at two points in adulthood, dynamic changes in adiposity over time, and body fat distribution, we identified obesity phenotypes associated with ER+ breast cancer risk. Our approach more clearly identifies specific risk groups than do analyses that evaluate similar measures separately. These findings may aid in improving risk prediction models and developing targeted interventions, and may clarify inconsistent findings across studies. BioMed Central 2016-12-21 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC5178085/ /pubmed/28003027 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13058-016-0790-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Horn-Ross, Pamela L.
Canchola, Alison J.
Bernstein, Leslie
Neuhausen, Susan L.
Nelson, David O.
Reynolds, Peggy
Lifetime body size and estrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer risk in the California Teachers Study cohort
title Lifetime body size and estrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer risk in the California Teachers Study cohort
title_full Lifetime body size and estrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer risk in the California Teachers Study cohort
title_fullStr Lifetime body size and estrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer risk in the California Teachers Study cohort
title_full_unstemmed Lifetime body size and estrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer risk in the California Teachers Study cohort
title_short Lifetime body size and estrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer risk in the California Teachers Study cohort
title_sort lifetime body size and estrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer risk in the california teachers study cohort
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5178085/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28003027
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13058-016-0790-5
work_keys_str_mv AT hornrosspamelal lifetimebodysizeandestrogenreceptorpositivebreastcancerriskinthecaliforniateachersstudycohort
AT cancholaalisonj lifetimebodysizeandestrogenreceptorpositivebreastcancerriskinthecaliforniateachersstudycohort
AT bernsteinleslie lifetimebodysizeandestrogenreceptorpositivebreastcancerriskinthecaliforniateachersstudycohort
AT neuhausensusanl lifetimebodysizeandestrogenreceptorpositivebreastcancerriskinthecaliforniateachersstudycohort
AT nelsondavido lifetimebodysizeandestrogenreceptorpositivebreastcancerriskinthecaliforniateachersstudycohort
AT reynoldspeggy lifetimebodysizeandestrogenreceptorpositivebreastcancerriskinthecaliforniateachersstudycohort