Cargando…
Litigation Friends or Foes? Representation of ‘P’ before the Court of Protection
This article argues that, properly analysed, the common law and the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) march hand in hand with the provisions of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA 2005) so as to impose a set of requirements on litigation friends acting for the subject of applications of proce...
Autores principales: | Ruck Keene, Alexander, Bartlett, Peter, Allen, Neil |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5178317/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28007807 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fww016 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Dangerous Liaisons? Psychiatry and Law in the Court of Protection—Expert Discourses of ‘Insight’ (and ‘Compliance’)
por: Case, Paula
Publicado: (2016) -
Mental Capacity Law, Autonomy, and best Interests: An Argument for Conceptual and Practical Clarity in the Court of Protection
por: Coggon, John
Publicado: (2016) -
The Implications of Meno’s Paradox for the Mental Capacity Act 2005
por: Skowron, Paul
Publicado: (2016) -
Best Interests in the Mental Capacity Act: Time to say Goodbye?
por: Donnelly, Mary
Publicado: (2016) -
Editorial: The Mental Capacity Act 2005—Ten Years On
por: Alghrani, Amel, et al.
Publicado: (2016)