Cargando…
Dangerous Liaisons? Psychiatry and Law in the Court of Protection—Expert Discourses of ‘Insight’ (and ‘Compliance’)
A finding that ‘P’ (as the person who is subject to Court of Protection proceedings is known) lacks mental capacity is the trigger for exposing them to decision-making by others and the powers of the Court of Protection (CoP) which, in the words of Justice Hedley, can be ‘invasive and draconian’ (He...
Autor principal: | Case, Paula |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5178320/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28007808 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fww027 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Mental Capacity Law, Autonomy, and best Interests: An Argument for Conceptual and Practical Clarity in the Court of Protection
por: Coggon, John
Publicado: (2016) -
Litigation Friends or Foes? Representation of ‘P’ before the Court of Protection
por: Ruck Keene, Alexander, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Editorial: The Mental Capacity Act 2005—Ten Years On
por: Alghrani, Amel, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
The Implications of Meno’s Paradox for the Mental Capacity Act 2005
por: Skowron, Paul
Publicado: (2016) -
Best Interests in the Mental Capacity Act: Time to say Goodbye?
por: Donnelly, Mary
Publicado: (2016)