Cargando…
Mental Capacity Law, Autonomy, and best Interests: An Argument for Conceptual and Practical Clarity in the Court of Protection
This article examines medical decision-making, arguing that the law, properly understood, requires where possible that equal weight be given to the wishes, feelings, beliefs, and values of patients who have, and patients who are deemed to lack, decision-making capacity. It responds critically to dom...
Autor principal: | Coggon, John |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5178324/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28007810 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fww034 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Best Interests in the Mental Capacity Act: Time to say Goodbye?
por: Donnelly, Mary
Publicado: (2016) -
Dangerous Liaisons? Psychiatry and Law in the Court of Protection—Expert Discourses of ‘Insight’ (and ‘Compliance’)
por: Case, Paula
Publicado: (2016) -
Litigation Friends or Foes? Representation of ‘P’ before the Court of Protection
por: Ruck Keene, Alexander, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Continuities of Risk in the Era of the Mental Capacity Act
por: Fanning, John
Publicado: (2016) -
The Implications of Meno’s Paradox for the Mental Capacity Act 2005
por: Skowron, Paul
Publicado: (2016)