Cargando…
Continuities of Risk in the Era of the Mental Capacity Act
When compared with the Mental Capacity Act (MCA) 2005, the Mental Health Act (MHA) 1983 seems an outlier. It authorises compulsory treatment of mental disorders on the basis of P’s risks. English law, therefore, discriminates between mental and physical disorders. Following the UK’s ratification of...
Autor principal: | Fanning, John |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5178325/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28007811 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fww036 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Editorial: The Mental Capacity Act 2005—Ten Years On
por: Alghrani, Amel, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
The Implications of Meno’s Paradox for the Mental Capacity Act 2005
por: Skowron, Paul
Publicado: (2016) -
Best Interests in the Mental Capacity Act: Time to say Goodbye?
por: Donnelly, Mary
Publicado: (2016) -
Mental Capacity Law, Autonomy, and best Interests: An Argument for Conceptual and Practical Clarity in the Court of Protection
por: Coggon, John
Publicado: (2016) -
Litigation Friends or Foes? Representation of ‘P’ before the Court of Protection
por: Ruck Keene, Alexander, et al.
Publicado: (2016)