Cargando…
Bibliometrics for Social Validation
This paper introduces a bibliometric, citation network-based method for assessing the social validation of novel research, and applies this method to the development of high-throughput toxicology research at the US Environmental Protection Agency. Social validation refers to the acceptance of novel...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5179025/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28005974 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168597 |
_version_ | 1782485298783977472 |
---|---|
author | Hicks, Daniel J. |
author_facet | Hicks, Daniel J. |
author_sort | Hicks, Daniel J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | This paper introduces a bibliometric, citation network-based method for assessing the social validation of novel research, and applies this method to the development of high-throughput toxicology research at the US Environmental Protection Agency. Social validation refers to the acceptance of novel research methods by a relevant scientific community; it is formally independent of the technical validation of methods, and is frequently studied in history, philosophy, and social studies of science using qualitative methods. The quantitative methods introduced here find that high-throughput toxicology methods are spread throughout a large and well-connected research community, which suggests high social validation. Further assessment of social validation involving mixed qualitative and quantitative methods are discussed in the conclusion. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5179025 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51790252017-01-04 Bibliometrics for Social Validation Hicks, Daniel J. PLoS One Research Article This paper introduces a bibliometric, citation network-based method for assessing the social validation of novel research, and applies this method to the development of high-throughput toxicology research at the US Environmental Protection Agency. Social validation refers to the acceptance of novel research methods by a relevant scientific community; it is formally independent of the technical validation of methods, and is frequently studied in history, philosophy, and social studies of science using qualitative methods. The quantitative methods introduced here find that high-throughput toxicology methods are spread throughout a large and well-connected research community, which suggests high social validation. Further assessment of social validation involving mixed qualitative and quantitative methods are discussed in the conclusion. Public Library of Science 2016-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5179025/ /pubmed/28005974 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168597 Text en © 2016 Daniel J. Hicks http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Hicks, Daniel J. Bibliometrics for Social Validation |
title | Bibliometrics for Social Validation |
title_full | Bibliometrics for Social Validation |
title_fullStr | Bibliometrics for Social Validation |
title_full_unstemmed | Bibliometrics for Social Validation |
title_short | Bibliometrics for Social Validation |
title_sort | bibliometrics for social validation |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5179025/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28005974 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168597 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hicksdanielj bibliometricsforsocialvalidation |