Cargando…

Bibliometrics for Social Validation

This paper introduces a bibliometric, citation network-based method for assessing the social validation of novel research, and applies this method to the development of high-throughput toxicology research at the US Environmental Protection Agency. Social validation refers to the acceptance of novel...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Hicks, Daniel J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5179025/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28005974
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168597
_version_ 1782485298783977472
author Hicks, Daniel J.
author_facet Hicks, Daniel J.
author_sort Hicks, Daniel J.
collection PubMed
description This paper introduces a bibliometric, citation network-based method for assessing the social validation of novel research, and applies this method to the development of high-throughput toxicology research at the US Environmental Protection Agency. Social validation refers to the acceptance of novel research methods by a relevant scientific community; it is formally independent of the technical validation of methods, and is frequently studied in history, philosophy, and social studies of science using qualitative methods. The quantitative methods introduced here find that high-throughput toxicology methods are spread throughout a large and well-connected research community, which suggests high social validation. Further assessment of social validation involving mixed qualitative and quantitative methods are discussed in the conclusion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5179025
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51790252017-01-04 Bibliometrics for Social Validation Hicks, Daniel J. PLoS One Research Article This paper introduces a bibliometric, citation network-based method for assessing the social validation of novel research, and applies this method to the development of high-throughput toxicology research at the US Environmental Protection Agency. Social validation refers to the acceptance of novel research methods by a relevant scientific community; it is formally independent of the technical validation of methods, and is frequently studied in history, philosophy, and social studies of science using qualitative methods. The quantitative methods introduced here find that high-throughput toxicology methods are spread throughout a large and well-connected research community, which suggests high social validation. Further assessment of social validation involving mixed qualitative and quantitative methods are discussed in the conclusion. Public Library of Science 2016-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5179025/ /pubmed/28005974 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168597 Text en © 2016 Daniel J. Hicks http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hicks, Daniel J.
Bibliometrics for Social Validation
title Bibliometrics for Social Validation
title_full Bibliometrics for Social Validation
title_fullStr Bibliometrics for Social Validation
title_full_unstemmed Bibliometrics for Social Validation
title_short Bibliometrics for Social Validation
title_sort bibliometrics for social validation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5179025/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28005974
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168597
work_keys_str_mv AT hicksdanielj bibliometricsforsocialvalidation