Cargando…

Contemporary use of arterial and venous conduits in coronary artery bypass grafting: anatomical, functional and clinical aspects

Although the benefits of using the left internal mammary artery to bypass the left anterior descending artery (LAD) have been extensively ascertained, freedom from major cardiovascular events and survival after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) also correlate with the completeness of revascular...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cuminetti, G., Gelsomino, S., Curello, S., Lorusso, R., Maessen, J. G., Hoorntje, J. C. A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5179367/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27878548
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12471-016-0919-2
_version_ 1782485343292882944
author Cuminetti, G.
Gelsomino, S.
Curello, S.
Lorusso, R.
Maessen, J. G.
Hoorntje, J. C. A.
author_facet Cuminetti, G.
Gelsomino, S.
Curello, S.
Lorusso, R.
Maessen, J. G.
Hoorntje, J. C. A.
author_sort Cuminetti, G.
collection PubMed
description Although the benefits of using the left internal mammary artery to bypass the left anterior descending artery (LAD) have been extensively ascertained, freedom from major cardiovascular events and survival after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) also correlate with the completeness of revascularisation. Hence, careful selection of the second-best graft conduit is crucial for CABG success. The more widespread use of saphenous vein grafts contrasts with the well-known long-term efficacy of multiple arterial grafting, which struggles to emerge as the procedure of choice due to concerns over increased technical difficulties and higher risk of postoperative complications. Conduit choice is at the discretion of the operator instead of being discussed by the heart team, where cardiologists are not usually engaged in such decisions due to a hypothetical lack of technical knowledge. Furthermore, according to the ESC/EACTS guidelines, traditional CABG remains the gold standard for multi-vessel coronary artery disease with complex LAD stenosis, but hybrid procedures using percutaneous coronary intervention for non-LAD targets could combine the best of two worlds. With the aim of raising the cardiologist’s awareness of the surgical treatment options, we provide a comprehensive overview of the anatomical, functional and clinical aspects guiding the decision-making process in CABG strategy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5179367
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51793672017-01-06 Contemporary use of arterial and venous conduits in coronary artery bypass grafting: anatomical, functional and clinical aspects Cuminetti, G. Gelsomino, S. Curello, S. Lorusso, R. Maessen, J. G. Hoorntje, J. C. A. Neth Heart J Review Article Although the benefits of using the left internal mammary artery to bypass the left anterior descending artery (LAD) have been extensively ascertained, freedom from major cardiovascular events and survival after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) also correlate with the completeness of revascularisation. Hence, careful selection of the second-best graft conduit is crucial for CABG success. The more widespread use of saphenous vein grafts contrasts with the well-known long-term efficacy of multiple arterial grafting, which struggles to emerge as the procedure of choice due to concerns over increased technical difficulties and higher risk of postoperative complications. Conduit choice is at the discretion of the operator instead of being discussed by the heart team, where cardiologists are not usually engaged in such decisions due to a hypothetical lack of technical knowledge. Furthermore, according to the ESC/EACTS guidelines, traditional CABG remains the gold standard for multi-vessel coronary artery disease with complex LAD stenosis, but hybrid procedures using percutaneous coronary intervention for non-LAD targets could combine the best of two worlds. With the aim of raising the cardiologist’s awareness of the surgical treatment options, we provide a comprehensive overview of the anatomical, functional and clinical aspects guiding the decision-making process in CABG strategy. Bohn Stafleu van Loghum 2016-11-22 2017-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5179367/ /pubmed/27878548 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12471-016-0919-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Review Article
Cuminetti, G.
Gelsomino, S.
Curello, S.
Lorusso, R.
Maessen, J. G.
Hoorntje, J. C. A.
Contemporary use of arterial and venous conduits in coronary artery bypass grafting: anatomical, functional and clinical aspects
title Contemporary use of arterial and venous conduits in coronary artery bypass grafting: anatomical, functional and clinical aspects
title_full Contemporary use of arterial and venous conduits in coronary artery bypass grafting: anatomical, functional and clinical aspects
title_fullStr Contemporary use of arterial and venous conduits in coronary artery bypass grafting: anatomical, functional and clinical aspects
title_full_unstemmed Contemporary use of arterial and venous conduits in coronary artery bypass grafting: anatomical, functional and clinical aspects
title_short Contemporary use of arterial and venous conduits in coronary artery bypass grafting: anatomical, functional and clinical aspects
title_sort contemporary use of arterial and venous conduits in coronary artery bypass grafting: anatomical, functional and clinical aspects
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5179367/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27878548
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12471-016-0919-2
work_keys_str_mv AT cuminettig contemporaryuseofarterialandvenousconduitsincoronaryarterybypassgraftinganatomicalfunctionalandclinicalaspects
AT gelsominos contemporaryuseofarterialandvenousconduitsincoronaryarterybypassgraftinganatomicalfunctionalandclinicalaspects
AT curellos contemporaryuseofarterialandvenousconduitsincoronaryarterybypassgraftinganatomicalfunctionalandclinicalaspects
AT lorussor contemporaryuseofarterialandvenousconduitsincoronaryarterybypassgraftinganatomicalfunctionalandclinicalaspects
AT maessenjg contemporaryuseofarterialandvenousconduitsincoronaryarterybypassgraftinganatomicalfunctionalandclinicalaspects
AT hoorntjejca contemporaryuseofarterialandvenousconduitsincoronaryarterybypassgraftinganatomicalfunctionalandclinicalaspects