Cargando…
A Review of the Segmental Diameter of the Healthy Human Spinal Cord
Knowledge of the average size and variability of the human spinal cord can be of importance when treating pathological conditions in the spinal cord. Data on healthy human spinal cord morphometrics have been published for more than a century using different techniques of measurements, but unfortunat...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5179522/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28066322 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2016.00238 |
_version_ | 1782485354644766720 |
---|---|
author | Frostell, Arvid Hakim, Ramil Thelin, Eric Peter Mattsson, Per Svensson, Mikael |
author_facet | Frostell, Arvid Hakim, Ramil Thelin, Eric Peter Mattsson, Per Svensson, Mikael |
author_sort | Frostell, Arvid |
collection | PubMed |
description | Knowledge of the average size and variability of the human spinal cord can be of importance when treating pathological conditions in the spinal cord. Data on healthy human spinal cord morphometrics have been published for more than a century using different techniques of measurements, but unfortunately, comparison of results from different studies is difficult because of the different anatomical landmarks used as reference points along the craniocaudal axis for the measurements. The aim of this review was to compute population estimates of the transverse and anteroposterior diameter of the human spinal cord by comparing and combining previously published data on a normalized craniocaudal axis. We included 11 studies presenting measurements of spinal cord cross-sectional diameters, with a combined sample size ranging from 15 to 488 subjects, depending on spinal cord level. Based on five published studies presenting data on the lengths of the segments of the spinal cord and vertebral column, we calculated the relative positions of all spinal cord neuronal segments and vertebral bony segments and mapped measurements of spinal cord size to a normalized craniocaudal axis. This mapping resulted in better alignment between studies and allowed the calculation of weighted averages and standard deviations (SDs) along the spinal cord. These weighted averages were smoothed using a generalized additive model to yield continuous population estimates for transverse and anteroposterior diameter and associated SDs. The spinal cord had the largest transverse diameter at spinal cord neuronal segment C5 (13.3 ± 2.2), decreased to segment T8 (8.3 ± 2.1), and increased slightly again to 9.4 ± 1.5 at L3. The anteroposterior diameter showed less variation in size along the spinal cord at C5 (7.4 ± 1.6), T8 (6.3 ± 2.0), and L3 (7.5 ± 1.6). All estimates are presented in millimeters ± 2 SDs. We conclude that segmental transverse and anteroposterior diameters of the healthy human spinal cord from different published sources can be combined on a normalized craniocaudal axis and yield meaningful population estimates. These estimates could be useful in routine management of patients with neurodegenerative diseases as well as for clinical research and experimental applications aimed at surgical spinal cord repair. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5179522 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51795222017-01-06 A Review of the Segmental Diameter of the Healthy Human Spinal Cord Frostell, Arvid Hakim, Ramil Thelin, Eric Peter Mattsson, Per Svensson, Mikael Front Neurol Neuroscience Knowledge of the average size and variability of the human spinal cord can be of importance when treating pathological conditions in the spinal cord. Data on healthy human spinal cord morphometrics have been published for more than a century using different techniques of measurements, but unfortunately, comparison of results from different studies is difficult because of the different anatomical landmarks used as reference points along the craniocaudal axis for the measurements. The aim of this review was to compute population estimates of the transverse and anteroposterior diameter of the human spinal cord by comparing and combining previously published data on a normalized craniocaudal axis. We included 11 studies presenting measurements of spinal cord cross-sectional diameters, with a combined sample size ranging from 15 to 488 subjects, depending on spinal cord level. Based on five published studies presenting data on the lengths of the segments of the spinal cord and vertebral column, we calculated the relative positions of all spinal cord neuronal segments and vertebral bony segments and mapped measurements of spinal cord size to a normalized craniocaudal axis. This mapping resulted in better alignment between studies and allowed the calculation of weighted averages and standard deviations (SDs) along the spinal cord. These weighted averages were smoothed using a generalized additive model to yield continuous population estimates for transverse and anteroposterior diameter and associated SDs. The spinal cord had the largest transverse diameter at spinal cord neuronal segment C5 (13.3 ± 2.2), decreased to segment T8 (8.3 ± 2.1), and increased slightly again to 9.4 ± 1.5 at L3. The anteroposterior diameter showed less variation in size along the spinal cord at C5 (7.4 ± 1.6), T8 (6.3 ± 2.0), and L3 (7.5 ± 1.6). All estimates are presented in millimeters ± 2 SDs. We conclude that segmental transverse and anteroposterior diameters of the healthy human spinal cord from different published sources can be combined on a normalized craniocaudal axis and yield meaningful population estimates. These estimates could be useful in routine management of patients with neurodegenerative diseases as well as for clinical research and experimental applications aimed at surgical spinal cord repair. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5179522/ /pubmed/28066322 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2016.00238 Text en Copyright © 2016 Frostell, Hakim, Thelin, Mattsson and Svensson. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Frostell, Arvid Hakim, Ramil Thelin, Eric Peter Mattsson, Per Svensson, Mikael A Review of the Segmental Diameter of the Healthy Human Spinal Cord |
title | A Review of the Segmental Diameter of the Healthy Human Spinal Cord |
title_full | A Review of the Segmental Diameter of the Healthy Human Spinal Cord |
title_fullStr | A Review of the Segmental Diameter of the Healthy Human Spinal Cord |
title_full_unstemmed | A Review of the Segmental Diameter of the Healthy Human Spinal Cord |
title_short | A Review of the Segmental Diameter of the Healthy Human Spinal Cord |
title_sort | review of the segmental diameter of the healthy human spinal cord |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5179522/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28066322 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2016.00238 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT frostellarvid areviewofthesegmentaldiameterofthehealthyhumanspinalcord AT hakimramil areviewofthesegmentaldiameterofthehealthyhumanspinalcord AT thelinericpeter areviewofthesegmentaldiameterofthehealthyhumanspinalcord AT mattssonper areviewofthesegmentaldiameterofthehealthyhumanspinalcord AT svenssonmikael areviewofthesegmentaldiameterofthehealthyhumanspinalcord AT frostellarvid reviewofthesegmentaldiameterofthehealthyhumanspinalcord AT hakimramil reviewofthesegmentaldiameterofthehealthyhumanspinalcord AT thelinericpeter reviewofthesegmentaldiameterofthehealthyhumanspinalcord AT mattssonper reviewofthesegmentaldiameterofthehealthyhumanspinalcord AT svenssonmikael reviewofthesegmentaldiameterofthehealthyhumanspinalcord |