Cargando…

Reduced Risk-Taking following Disruption of the Intraparietal Sulcus

Decision makers frequently encounter opportunities to pursue great gains—assuming they are willing to accept greater risks. Previous neuroimaging studies have shown that activity in the intraparietal sulcus (IPS) and the inferior frontal junction (IFJ) are associated with individual preferences for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Coutlee, Christopher G., Kiyonaga, Anastasia, Korb, Franziska M., Huettel, Scott A., Egner, Tobias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5179562/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28066171
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2016.00588
_version_ 1782485363635257344
author Coutlee, Christopher G.
Kiyonaga, Anastasia
Korb, Franziska M.
Huettel, Scott A.
Egner, Tobias
author_facet Coutlee, Christopher G.
Kiyonaga, Anastasia
Korb, Franziska M.
Huettel, Scott A.
Egner, Tobias
author_sort Coutlee, Christopher G.
collection PubMed
description Decision makers frequently encounter opportunities to pursue great gains—assuming they are willing to accept greater risks. Previous neuroimaging studies have shown that activity in the intraparietal sulcus (IPS) and the inferior frontal junction (IFJ) are associated with individual preferences for economic risk (“known unknowns,” e.g., a 50% chance of winning $5) and ambiguity (“unknown unknowns,” e.g., an unknown chance of winning $5), respectively. Whether processing in these regions causally enables risk-taking for individual decisions, however, remains unknown. To examine this question, we assessed the decision to engage in risk-taking after disrupting neural processing in the IPS and IFJ of healthy human participants using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. While stimulation of the IFJ resulted in general slowing of decision times, disrupting neural processing within the IPS selectively suppressed risk-taking, biasing choices toward certain options featuring both lower risks and lower expected rewards. Our results are the first to demonstrate the necessity of intact IPS function for choosing uncertain outcomes when faced with calculable risks and rewards. Engagement of IPS during decision making may support a willingness to accept uncertain outcomes for a chance to obtain greater gains.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5179562
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51795622017-01-06 Reduced Risk-Taking following Disruption of the Intraparietal Sulcus Coutlee, Christopher G. Kiyonaga, Anastasia Korb, Franziska M. Huettel, Scott A. Egner, Tobias Front Neurosci Neuroscience Decision makers frequently encounter opportunities to pursue great gains—assuming they are willing to accept greater risks. Previous neuroimaging studies have shown that activity in the intraparietal sulcus (IPS) and the inferior frontal junction (IFJ) are associated with individual preferences for economic risk (“known unknowns,” e.g., a 50% chance of winning $5) and ambiguity (“unknown unknowns,” e.g., an unknown chance of winning $5), respectively. Whether processing in these regions causally enables risk-taking for individual decisions, however, remains unknown. To examine this question, we assessed the decision to engage in risk-taking after disrupting neural processing in the IPS and IFJ of healthy human participants using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. While stimulation of the IFJ resulted in general slowing of decision times, disrupting neural processing within the IPS selectively suppressed risk-taking, biasing choices toward certain options featuring both lower risks and lower expected rewards. Our results are the first to demonstrate the necessity of intact IPS function for choosing uncertain outcomes when faced with calculable risks and rewards. Engagement of IPS during decision making may support a willingness to accept uncertain outcomes for a chance to obtain greater gains. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5179562/ /pubmed/28066171 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2016.00588 Text en Copyright © 2016 Coutlee, Kiyonaga, Korb, Huettel and Egner. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Coutlee, Christopher G.
Kiyonaga, Anastasia
Korb, Franziska M.
Huettel, Scott A.
Egner, Tobias
Reduced Risk-Taking following Disruption of the Intraparietal Sulcus
title Reduced Risk-Taking following Disruption of the Intraparietal Sulcus
title_full Reduced Risk-Taking following Disruption of the Intraparietal Sulcus
title_fullStr Reduced Risk-Taking following Disruption of the Intraparietal Sulcus
title_full_unstemmed Reduced Risk-Taking following Disruption of the Intraparietal Sulcus
title_short Reduced Risk-Taking following Disruption of the Intraparietal Sulcus
title_sort reduced risk-taking following disruption of the intraparietal sulcus
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5179562/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28066171
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2016.00588
work_keys_str_mv AT coutleechristopherg reducedrisktakingfollowingdisruptionoftheintraparietalsulcus
AT kiyonagaanastasia reducedrisktakingfollowingdisruptionoftheintraparietalsulcus
AT korbfranziskam reducedrisktakingfollowingdisruptionoftheintraparietalsulcus
AT huettelscotta reducedrisktakingfollowingdisruptionoftheintraparietalsulcus
AT egnertobias reducedrisktakingfollowingdisruptionoftheintraparietalsulcus