Cargando…
Reduced Risk-Taking following Disruption of the Intraparietal Sulcus
Decision makers frequently encounter opportunities to pursue great gains—assuming they are willing to accept greater risks. Previous neuroimaging studies have shown that activity in the intraparietal sulcus (IPS) and the inferior frontal junction (IFJ) are associated with individual preferences for...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5179562/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28066171 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2016.00588 |
_version_ | 1782485363635257344 |
---|---|
author | Coutlee, Christopher G. Kiyonaga, Anastasia Korb, Franziska M. Huettel, Scott A. Egner, Tobias |
author_facet | Coutlee, Christopher G. Kiyonaga, Anastasia Korb, Franziska M. Huettel, Scott A. Egner, Tobias |
author_sort | Coutlee, Christopher G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Decision makers frequently encounter opportunities to pursue great gains—assuming they are willing to accept greater risks. Previous neuroimaging studies have shown that activity in the intraparietal sulcus (IPS) and the inferior frontal junction (IFJ) are associated with individual preferences for economic risk (“known unknowns,” e.g., a 50% chance of winning $5) and ambiguity (“unknown unknowns,” e.g., an unknown chance of winning $5), respectively. Whether processing in these regions causally enables risk-taking for individual decisions, however, remains unknown. To examine this question, we assessed the decision to engage in risk-taking after disrupting neural processing in the IPS and IFJ of healthy human participants using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. While stimulation of the IFJ resulted in general slowing of decision times, disrupting neural processing within the IPS selectively suppressed risk-taking, biasing choices toward certain options featuring both lower risks and lower expected rewards. Our results are the first to demonstrate the necessity of intact IPS function for choosing uncertain outcomes when faced with calculable risks and rewards. Engagement of IPS during decision making may support a willingness to accept uncertain outcomes for a chance to obtain greater gains. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5179562 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51795622017-01-06 Reduced Risk-Taking following Disruption of the Intraparietal Sulcus Coutlee, Christopher G. Kiyonaga, Anastasia Korb, Franziska M. Huettel, Scott A. Egner, Tobias Front Neurosci Neuroscience Decision makers frequently encounter opportunities to pursue great gains—assuming they are willing to accept greater risks. Previous neuroimaging studies have shown that activity in the intraparietal sulcus (IPS) and the inferior frontal junction (IFJ) are associated with individual preferences for economic risk (“known unknowns,” e.g., a 50% chance of winning $5) and ambiguity (“unknown unknowns,” e.g., an unknown chance of winning $5), respectively. Whether processing in these regions causally enables risk-taking for individual decisions, however, remains unknown. To examine this question, we assessed the decision to engage in risk-taking after disrupting neural processing in the IPS and IFJ of healthy human participants using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. While stimulation of the IFJ resulted in general slowing of decision times, disrupting neural processing within the IPS selectively suppressed risk-taking, biasing choices toward certain options featuring both lower risks and lower expected rewards. Our results are the first to demonstrate the necessity of intact IPS function for choosing uncertain outcomes when faced with calculable risks and rewards. Engagement of IPS during decision making may support a willingness to accept uncertain outcomes for a chance to obtain greater gains. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5179562/ /pubmed/28066171 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2016.00588 Text en Copyright © 2016 Coutlee, Kiyonaga, Korb, Huettel and Egner. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Coutlee, Christopher G. Kiyonaga, Anastasia Korb, Franziska M. Huettel, Scott A. Egner, Tobias Reduced Risk-Taking following Disruption of the Intraparietal Sulcus |
title | Reduced Risk-Taking following Disruption of the Intraparietal Sulcus |
title_full | Reduced Risk-Taking following Disruption of the Intraparietal Sulcus |
title_fullStr | Reduced Risk-Taking following Disruption of the Intraparietal Sulcus |
title_full_unstemmed | Reduced Risk-Taking following Disruption of the Intraparietal Sulcus |
title_short | Reduced Risk-Taking following Disruption of the Intraparietal Sulcus |
title_sort | reduced risk-taking following disruption of the intraparietal sulcus |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5179562/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28066171 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2016.00588 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT coutleechristopherg reducedrisktakingfollowingdisruptionoftheintraparietalsulcus AT kiyonagaanastasia reducedrisktakingfollowingdisruptionoftheintraparietalsulcus AT korbfranziskam reducedrisktakingfollowingdisruptionoftheintraparietalsulcus AT huettelscotta reducedrisktakingfollowingdisruptionoftheintraparietalsulcus AT egnertobias reducedrisktakingfollowingdisruptionoftheintraparietalsulcus |