Cargando…

Clinical utility of sperm DNA fragmentation testing: practice recommendations based on clinical scenarios

Sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF) has been generally acknowledged as a valuable tool for male fertility evaluation. While its detrimental implications on sperm function were extensively investigated, little is known about the actual indications for performing SDF analysis. This review delivers practice...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Agarwal, Ashok, Majzoub, Ahmad, Esteves, Sandro C., Ko, Edmund, Ramasamy, Ranjith, Zini, Armand
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5182232/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28078226
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2016.10.03
_version_ 1782485829177835520
author Agarwal, Ashok
Majzoub, Ahmad
Esteves, Sandro C.
Ko, Edmund
Ramasamy, Ranjith
Zini, Armand
author_facet Agarwal, Ashok
Majzoub, Ahmad
Esteves, Sandro C.
Ko, Edmund
Ramasamy, Ranjith
Zini, Armand
author_sort Agarwal, Ashok
collection PubMed
description Sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF) has been generally acknowledged as a valuable tool for male fertility evaluation. While its detrimental implications on sperm function were extensively investigated, little is known about the actual indications for performing SDF analysis. This review delivers practice based recommendations on commonly encountered scenarios in the clinic. An illustrative description of the different SDF measurement techniques is presented. SDF testing is recommended in patients with clinical varicocele and borderline to normal semen parameters as it can better select varicocelectomy candidates. High SDF is also linked with recurrent spontaneous abortion (RSA) and can influence outcomes of different assisted reproductive techniques. Several studies have shown some benefit in using testicular sperm rather than ejaculated sperm in men with high SDF, oligozoospermia or recurrent in vitro fertilization (IVF) failure. Infertile men with evidence of exposure to pollutants can benefit from sperm DNA testing as it can help reinforce the importance of lifestyle modification (e.g., cessation of cigarette smoking, antioxidant therapy), predict fertility and monitor the patient’s response to intervention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5182232
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51822322017-01-11 Clinical utility of sperm DNA fragmentation testing: practice recommendations based on clinical scenarios Agarwal, Ashok Majzoub, Ahmad Esteves, Sandro C. Ko, Edmund Ramasamy, Ranjith Zini, Armand Transl Androl Urol Guideline Sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF) has been generally acknowledged as a valuable tool for male fertility evaluation. While its detrimental implications on sperm function were extensively investigated, little is known about the actual indications for performing SDF analysis. This review delivers practice based recommendations on commonly encountered scenarios in the clinic. An illustrative description of the different SDF measurement techniques is presented. SDF testing is recommended in patients with clinical varicocele and borderline to normal semen parameters as it can better select varicocelectomy candidates. High SDF is also linked with recurrent spontaneous abortion (RSA) and can influence outcomes of different assisted reproductive techniques. Several studies have shown some benefit in using testicular sperm rather than ejaculated sperm in men with high SDF, oligozoospermia or recurrent in vitro fertilization (IVF) failure. Infertile men with evidence of exposure to pollutants can benefit from sperm DNA testing as it can help reinforce the importance of lifestyle modification (e.g., cessation of cigarette smoking, antioxidant therapy), predict fertility and monitor the patient’s response to intervention. AME Publishing Company 2016-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5182232/ /pubmed/28078226 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2016.10.03 Text en 2016 Translational Andrology and Urology. All rights reserved.
spellingShingle Guideline
Agarwal, Ashok
Majzoub, Ahmad
Esteves, Sandro C.
Ko, Edmund
Ramasamy, Ranjith
Zini, Armand
Clinical utility of sperm DNA fragmentation testing: practice recommendations based on clinical scenarios
title Clinical utility of sperm DNA fragmentation testing: practice recommendations based on clinical scenarios
title_full Clinical utility of sperm DNA fragmentation testing: practice recommendations based on clinical scenarios
title_fullStr Clinical utility of sperm DNA fragmentation testing: practice recommendations based on clinical scenarios
title_full_unstemmed Clinical utility of sperm DNA fragmentation testing: practice recommendations based on clinical scenarios
title_short Clinical utility of sperm DNA fragmentation testing: practice recommendations based on clinical scenarios
title_sort clinical utility of sperm dna fragmentation testing: practice recommendations based on clinical scenarios
topic Guideline
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5182232/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28078226
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2016.10.03
work_keys_str_mv AT agarwalashok clinicalutilityofspermdnafragmentationtestingpracticerecommendationsbasedonclinicalscenarios
AT majzoubahmad clinicalutilityofspermdnafragmentationtestingpracticerecommendationsbasedonclinicalscenarios
AT estevessandroc clinicalutilityofspermdnafragmentationtestingpracticerecommendationsbasedonclinicalscenarios
AT koedmund clinicalutilityofspermdnafragmentationtestingpracticerecommendationsbasedonclinicalscenarios
AT ramasamyranjith clinicalutilityofspermdnafragmentationtestingpracticerecommendationsbasedonclinicalscenarios
AT ziniarmand clinicalutilityofspermdnafragmentationtestingpracticerecommendationsbasedonclinicalscenarios