Cargando…

Simplified large African carnivore density estimators from track indices

BACKGROUND: The range, population size and trend of large carnivores are important parameters to assess their status globally and to plan conservation strategies. One can use linear models to assess population size and trends of large carnivores from track-based surveys on suitable substrates. The c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Winterbach, Christiaan W., Ferreira, Sam M., Funston, Paul J., Somers, Michael J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5182995/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28028454
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2662
_version_ 1782485977215795200
author Winterbach, Christiaan W.
Ferreira, Sam M.
Funston, Paul J.
Somers, Michael J.
author_facet Winterbach, Christiaan W.
Ferreira, Sam M.
Funston, Paul J.
Somers, Michael J.
author_sort Winterbach, Christiaan W.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The range, population size and trend of large carnivores are important parameters to assess their status globally and to plan conservation strategies. One can use linear models to assess population size and trends of large carnivores from track-based surveys on suitable substrates. The conventional approach of a linear model with intercept may not intercept at zero, but may fit the data better than linear model through the origin. We assess whether a linear regression through the origin is more appropriate than a linear regression with intercept to model large African carnivore densities and track indices. METHODS: We did simple linear regression with intercept analysis and simple linear regression through the origin and used the confidence interval for ß in the linear model y = αx + ß, Standard Error of Estimate, Mean Squares Residual and Akaike Information Criteria to evaluate the models. RESULTS: The Lion on Clay and Low Density on Sand models with intercept were not significant (P > 0.05). The other four models with intercept and the six models thorough origin were all significant (P < 0.05). The models using linear regression with intercept all included zero in the confidence interval for ß and the null hypothesis that ß = 0 could not be rejected. All models showed that the linear model through the origin provided a better fit than the linear model with intercept, as indicated by the Standard Error of Estimate and Mean Square Residuals. Akaike Information Criteria showed that linear models through the origin were better and that none of the linear models with intercept had substantial support. DISCUSSION: Our results showed that linear regression through the origin is justified over the more typical linear regression with intercept for all models we tested. A general model can be used to estimate large carnivore densities from track densities across species and study areas. The formula observed track density = 3.26 × carnivore density can be used to estimate densities of large African carnivores using track counts on sandy substrates in areas where carnivore densities are 0.27 carnivores/100 km(2) or higher. To improve the current models, we need independent data to validate the models and data to test for non-linear relationship between track indices and true density at low densities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5182995
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51829952016-12-27 Simplified large African carnivore density estimators from track indices Winterbach, Christiaan W. Ferreira, Sam M. Funston, Paul J. Somers, Michael J. PeerJ Biodiversity BACKGROUND: The range, population size and trend of large carnivores are important parameters to assess their status globally and to plan conservation strategies. One can use linear models to assess population size and trends of large carnivores from track-based surveys on suitable substrates. The conventional approach of a linear model with intercept may not intercept at zero, but may fit the data better than linear model through the origin. We assess whether a linear regression through the origin is more appropriate than a linear regression with intercept to model large African carnivore densities and track indices. METHODS: We did simple linear regression with intercept analysis and simple linear regression through the origin and used the confidence interval for ß in the linear model y = αx + ß, Standard Error of Estimate, Mean Squares Residual and Akaike Information Criteria to evaluate the models. RESULTS: The Lion on Clay and Low Density on Sand models with intercept were not significant (P > 0.05). The other four models with intercept and the six models thorough origin were all significant (P < 0.05). The models using linear regression with intercept all included zero in the confidence interval for ß and the null hypothesis that ß = 0 could not be rejected. All models showed that the linear model through the origin provided a better fit than the linear model with intercept, as indicated by the Standard Error of Estimate and Mean Square Residuals. Akaike Information Criteria showed that linear models through the origin were better and that none of the linear models with intercept had substantial support. DISCUSSION: Our results showed that linear regression through the origin is justified over the more typical linear regression with intercept for all models we tested. A general model can be used to estimate large carnivore densities from track densities across species and study areas. The formula observed track density = 3.26 × carnivore density can be used to estimate densities of large African carnivores using track counts on sandy substrates in areas where carnivore densities are 0.27 carnivores/100 km(2) or higher. To improve the current models, we need independent data to validate the models and data to test for non-linear relationship between track indices and true density at low densities. PeerJ Inc. 2016-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5182995/ /pubmed/28028454 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2662 Text en ©2016 Winterbach et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Biodiversity
Winterbach, Christiaan W.
Ferreira, Sam M.
Funston, Paul J.
Somers, Michael J.
Simplified large African carnivore density estimators from track indices
title Simplified large African carnivore density estimators from track indices
title_full Simplified large African carnivore density estimators from track indices
title_fullStr Simplified large African carnivore density estimators from track indices
title_full_unstemmed Simplified large African carnivore density estimators from track indices
title_short Simplified large African carnivore density estimators from track indices
title_sort simplified large african carnivore density estimators from track indices
topic Biodiversity
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5182995/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28028454
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2662
work_keys_str_mv AT winterbachchristiaanw simplifiedlargeafricancarnivoredensityestimatorsfromtrackindices
AT ferreirasamm simplifiedlargeafricancarnivoredensityestimatorsfromtrackindices
AT funstonpaulj simplifiedlargeafricancarnivoredensityestimatorsfromtrackindices
AT somersmichaelj simplifiedlargeafricancarnivoredensityestimatorsfromtrackindices