Cargando…

Evaluating community pharmacy practice in Qatar using simulated patient method:acute gastroenteritis management

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate Qatari pharmacists’ prescribing, labeling, dispensing and counseling practices in response to acute community-acquired gastroenteritis. METHODS: The simulated patient method was used in this study. Thirty pharmacies in Doha were randomly selected and further randomized into tw...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ibrahim, Mohamed I., Palaian, Subish, Al-Sulaiti, Fatima, El-Shami, Somia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Centro de Investigaciones y Publicaciones Farmaceuticas 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5184373/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28042351
http://dx.doi.org/10.18549/PharmPract.2016.04.800
_version_ 1782486236843212800
author Ibrahim, Mohamed I.
Palaian, Subish
Al-Sulaiti, Fatima
El-Shami, Somia
author_facet Ibrahim, Mohamed I.
Palaian, Subish
Al-Sulaiti, Fatima
El-Shami, Somia
author_sort Ibrahim, Mohamed I.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate Qatari pharmacists’ prescribing, labeling, dispensing and counseling practices in response to acute community-acquired gastroenteritis. METHODS: The simulated patient method was used in this study. Thirty pharmacies in Doha were randomly selected and further randomized into two groups: Face-to-Face (n=15) vs. Telephone-call (n=15) per simulated patient; 2 simulated patients were involved. Prescribing, labeling, dispensing and counseling practices were assessed. Data analysis was performed using Mann-Whitney and chi square tests at alpha=0.05. RESULTS: Most pharmacists prescribed and dispensed medicines (96%), including antimicrobials (43.9%), antidiarrheals (36%), antiemetics (5.1%) and antipyretics (3%). Counseling practices were poor (62.1% in the face-to-face group vs 70% in the telephone-call group did not counsel simulated patients about the dispensed medicines; p-value=0.50). In more than one-third of the encounters, at least one labeling parameter was missing. The duration of each interaction in minutes was not significantly different between the groups [median (IQR); 3(4.25) in the face-to-face group versus 2(0.25) in the telephone-call group; p-value=0.77]. No significant differences in prescribing or dispensing behaviors were present between groups (p-value>0.05). CONCLUSION: Qatar community pharmacists’ labeling, dispensing, and counseling practices were below expectation, thus urging the need for continuous professional development.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5184373
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Centro de Investigaciones y Publicaciones Farmaceuticas
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51843732016-12-30 Evaluating community pharmacy practice in Qatar using simulated patient method:acute gastroenteritis management Ibrahim, Mohamed I. Palaian, Subish Al-Sulaiti, Fatima El-Shami, Somia Pharm Pract (Granada) Original Research OBJECTIVE: To evaluate Qatari pharmacists’ prescribing, labeling, dispensing and counseling practices in response to acute community-acquired gastroenteritis. METHODS: The simulated patient method was used in this study. Thirty pharmacies in Doha were randomly selected and further randomized into two groups: Face-to-Face (n=15) vs. Telephone-call (n=15) per simulated patient; 2 simulated patients were involved. Prescribing, labeling, dispensing and counseling practices were assessed. Data analysis was performed using Mann-Whitney and chi square tests at alpha=0.05. RESULTS: Most pharmacists prescribed and dispensed medicines (96%), including antimicrobials (43.9%), antidiarrheals (36%), antiemetics (5.1%) and antipyretics (3%). Counseling practices were poor (62.1% in the face-to-face group vs 70% in the telephone-call group did not counsel simulated patients about the dispensed medicines; p-value=0.50). In more than one-third of the encounters, at least one labeling parameter was missing. The duration of each interaction in minutes was not significantly different between the groups [median (IQR); 3(4.25) in the face-to-face group versus 2(0.25) in the telephone-call group; p-value=0.77]. No significant differences in prescribing or dispensing behaviors were present between groups (p-value>0.05). CONCLUSION: Qatar community pharmacists’ labeling, dispensing, and counseling practices were below expectation, thus urging the need for continuous professional development. Centro de Investigaciones y Publicaciones Farmaceuticas 2016 2016-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5184373/ /pubmed/28042351 http://dx.doi.org/10.18549/PharmPract.2016.04.800 Text en Copyright: © Pharmacy Practice http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Ibrahim, Mohamed I.
Palaian, Subish
Al-Sulaiti, Fatima
El-Shami, Somia
Evaluating community pharmacy practice in Qatar using simulated patient method:acute gastroenteritis management
title Evaluating community pharmacy practice in Qatar using simulated patient method:acute gastroenteritis management
title_full Evaluating community pharmacy practice in Qatar using simulated patient method:acute gastroenteritis management
title_fullStr Evaluating community pharmacy practice in Qatar using simulated patient method:acute gastroenteritis management
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating community pharmacy practice in Qatar using simulated patient method:acute gastroenteritis management
title_short Evaluating community pharmacy practice in Qatar using simulated patient method:acute gastroenteritis management
title_sort evaluating community pharmacy practice in qatar using simulated patient method:acute gastroenteritis management
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5184373/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28042351
http://dx.doi.org/10.18549/PharmPract.2016.04.800
work_keys_str_mv AT ibrahimmohamedi evaluatingcommunitypharmacypracticeinqatarusingsimulatedpatientmethodacutegastroenteritismanagement
AT palaiansubish evaluatingcommunitypharmacypracticeinqatarusingsimulatedpatientmethodacutegastroenteritismanagement
AT alsulaitifatima evaluatingcommunitypharmacypracticeinqatarusingsimulatedpatientmethodacutegastroenteritismanagement
AT elshamisomia evaluatingcommunitypharmacypracticeinqatarusingsimulatedpatientmethodacutegastroenteritismanagement