Cargando…

Evaluating the Influence of Spatial Resampling for Motion Correction in Resting-State Functional MRI

Head motion is one of major concerns in current resting-state functional MRI studies. Image realignment including motion estimation and spatial resampling is often applied to achieve rigid-body motion correction. While the accurate estimation of motion parameters has been addressed in most studies,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yuan, Lisha, He, Hongjian, Zhang, Han, Zhong, Jianhui
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5186805/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28082860
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2016.00591
_version_ 1782486711851286528
author Yuan, Lisha
He, Hongjian
Zhang, Han
Zhong, Jianhui
author_facet Yuan, Lisha
He, Hongjian
Zhang, Han
Zhong, Jianhui
author_sort Yuan, Lisha
collection PubMed
description Head motion is one of major concerns in current resting-state functional MRI studies. Image realignment including motion estimation and spatial resampling is often applied to achieve rigid-body motion correction. While the accurate estimation of motion parameters has been addressed in most studies, spatial resampling could also produce spurious variance, and lead to unexpected errors on the amplitude of BOLD signal. In this study, two simulation experiments were designed to characterize these variance related with spatial resampling. The fluctuation amplitude of spurious variance was first investigated using a set of simulated images with estimated motion parameters from a real dataset, and regions more likely to be affected by spatial resampling were found around the peripheral regions of the cortex. The other simulation was designed with three typical types of motion parameters to represent different extents of motion. It was found that areas with significant correlation between spurious variance and head motion scattered all over the brain and varied greatly from one motion type to another. In the last part of this study, four popular motion regression approaches were applied respectively and their performance in reducing spurious variance was compared. Among them, Friston 24 and Voxel-specific 12 model (Friston et al., 1996), were found to have the best outcomes. By separating related effects during fMRI analysis, this study provides a better understanding of the characteristics of spatial resampling and the interpretation of motion-BOLD relationship.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5186805
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51868052017-01-12 Evaluating the Influence of Spatial Resampling for Motion Correction in Resting-State Functional MRI Yuan, Lisha He, Hongjian Zhang, Han Zhong, Jianhui Front Neurosci Neuroscience Head motion is one of major concerns in current resting-state functional MRI studies. Image realignment including motion estimation and spatial resampling is often applied to achieve rigid-body motion correction. While the accurate estimation of motion parameters has been addressed in most studies, spatial resampling could also produce spurious variance, and lead to unexpected errors on the amplitude of BOLD signal. In this study, two simulation experiments were designed to characterize these variance related with spatial resampling. The fluctuation amplitude of spurious variance was first investigated using a set of simulated images with estimated motion parameters from a real dataset, and regions more likely to be affected by spatial resampling were found around the peripheral regions of the cortex. The other simulation was designed with three typical types of motion parameters to represent different extents of motion. It was found that areas with significant correlation between spurious variance and head motion scattered all over the brain and varied greatly from one motion type to another. In the last part of this study, four popular motion regression approaches were applied respectively and their performance in reducing spurious variance was compared. Among them, Friston 24 and Voxel-specific 12 model (Friston et al., 1996), were found to have the best outcomes. By separating related effects during fMRI analysis, this study provides a better understanding of the characteristics of spatial resampling and the interpretation of motion-BOLD relationship. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-12-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5186805/ /pubmed/28082860 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2016.00591 Text en Copyright © 2016 Yuan, He, Zhang and Zhong. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Yuan, Lisha
He, Hongjian
Zhang, Han
Zhong, Jianhui
Evaluating the Influence of Spatial Resampling for Motion Correction in Resting-State Functional MRI
title Evaluating the Influence of Spatial Resampling for Motion Correction in Resting-State Functional MRI
title_full Evaluating the Influence of Spatial Resampling for Motion Correction in Resting-State Functional MRI
title_fullStr Evaluating the Influence of Spatial Resampling for Motion Correction in Resting-State Functional MRI
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the Influence of Spatial Resampling for Motion Correction in Resting-State Functional MRI
title_short Evaluating the Influence of Spatial Resampling for Motion Correction in Resting-State Functional MRI
title_sort evaluating the influence of spatial resampling for motion correction in resting-state functional mri
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5186805/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28082860
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2016.00591
work_keys_str_mv AT yuanlisha evaluatingtheinfluenceofspatialresamplingformotioncorrectioninrestingstatefunctionalmri
AT hehongjian evaluatingtheinfluenceofspatialresamplingformotioncorrectioninrestingstatefunctionalmri
AT zhanghan evaluatingtheinfluenceofspatialresamplingformotioncorrectioninrestingstatefunctionalmri
AT zhongjianhui evaluatingtheinfluenceofspatialresamplingformotioncorrectioninrestingstatefunctionalmri