Cargando…

Persistent Persister Misperceptions

Persister cells survive antibiotic treatment due to their lack of metabolism, rather than through genetic change, as shown via four seminal experiments conducted by the discoverers of the phenotype (Hobby et al., 1942; Bigger, 1944). Unfortunately, over seven decades of persister cell research, the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Jun-Seob, Wood, Thomas K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5187198/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28082974
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.02134
_version_ 1782486792680767488
author Kim, Jun-Seob
Wood, Thomas K.
author_facet Kim, Jun-Seob
Wood, Thomas K.
author_sort Kim, Jun-Seob
collection PubMed
description Persister cells survive antibiotic treatment due to their lack of metabolism, rather than through genetic change, as shown via four seminal experiments conducted by the discoverers of the phenotype (Hobby et al., 1942; Bigger, 1944). Unfortunately, over seven decades of persister cell research, the literature has been populated by misperceptions that do not withstand scrutiny. This opinion piece examines some of those misunderstandings in the literature with the hope that by shining some light on these inaccuracies, the field may be advanced and subsequent manuscripts may be reviewed more critically.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5187198
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51871982017-01-12 Persistent Persister Misperceptions Kim, Jun-Seob Wood, Thomas K. Front Microbiol Microbiology Persister cells survive antibiotic treatment due to their lack of metabolism, rather than through genetic change, as shown via four seminal experiments conducted by the discoverers of the phenotype (Hobby et al., 1942; Bigger, 1944). Unfortunately, over seven decades of persister cell research, the literature has been populated by misperceptions that do not withstand scrutiny. This opinion piece examines some of those misunderstandings in the literature with the hope that by shining some light on these inaccuracies, the field may be advanced and subsequent manuscripts may be reviewed more critically. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-12-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5187198/ /pubmed/28082974 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.02134 Text en Copyright © 2016 Kim and Wood. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Microbiology
Kim, Jun-Seob
Wood, Thomas K.
Persistent Persister Misperceptions
title Persistent Persister Misperceptions
title_full Persistent Persister Misperceptions
title_fullStr Persistent Persister Misperceptions
title_full_unstemmed Persistent Persister Misperceptions
title_short Persistent Persister Misperceptions
title_sort persistent persister misperceptions
topic Microbiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5187198/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28082974
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.02134
work_keys_str_mv AT kimjunseob persistentpersistermisperceptions
AT woodthomask persistentpersistermisperceptions