Cargando…

Future Prospects for Scaffolding Methods and Biomaterials in Skin Tissue Engineering: A Review

Over centuries, the field of regenerative skin tissue engineering has had several advancements to facilitate faster wound healing and thereby restoration of skin. Skin tissue regeneration is mainly based on the use of suitable scaffold matrices. There are several scaffold types, such as porous, fibr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chaudhari, Atul A., Vig, Komal, Baganizi, Dieudonné Radé, Sahu, Rajnish, Dixit, Saurabh, Dennis, Vida, Singh, Shree Ram, Pillai, Shreekumar R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5187774/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27898014
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms17121974
_version_ 1782486894911684608
author Chaudhari, Atul A.
Vig, Komal
Baganizi, Dieudonné Radé
Sahu, Rajnish
Dixit, Saurabh
Dennis, Vida
Singh, Shree Ram
Pillai, Shreekumar R.
author_facet Chaudhari, Atul A.
Vig, Komal
Baganizi, Dieudonné Radé
Sahu, Rajnish
Dixit, Saurabh
Dennis, Vida
Singh, Shree Ram
Pillai, Shreekumar R.
author_sort Chaudhari, Atul A.
collection PubMed
description Over centuries, the field of regenerative skin tissue engineering has had several advancements to facilitate faster wound healing and thereby restoration of skin. Skin tissue regeneration is mainly based on the use of suitable scaffold matrices. There are several scaffold types, such as porous, fibrous, microsphere, hydrogel, composite and acellular, etc., with discrete advantages and disadvantages. These scaffolds are either made up of highly biocompatible natural biomaterials, such as collagen, chitosan, etc., or synthetic materials, such as polycaprolactone (PCL), and poly-ethylene-glycol (PEG), etc. Composite scaffolds, which are a combination of natural or synthetic biomaterials, are highly biocompatible with improved tensile strength for effective skin tissue regeneration. Appropriate knowledge of the properties, advantages and disadvantages of various biomaterials and scaffolds will accelerate the production of suitable scaffolds for skin tissue regeneration applications. At the same time, emphasis on some of the leading challenges in the field of skin tissue engineering, such as cell interaction with scaffolds, faster cellular proliferation/differentiation, and vascularization of engineered tissues, is inevitable. In this review, we discuss various types of scaffolding approaches and biomaterials used in the field of skin tissue engineering and more importantly their future prospects in skin tissue regeneration efforts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5187774
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51877742016-12-30 Future Prospects for Scaffolding Methods and Biomaterials in Skin Tissue Engineering: A Review Chaudhari, Atul A. Vig, Komal Baganizi, Dieudonné Radé Sahu, Rajnish Dixit, Saurabh Dennis, Vida Singh, Shree Ram Pillai, Shreekumar R. Int J Mol Sci Review Over centuries, the field of regenerative skin tissue engineering has had several advancements to facilitate faster wound healing and thereby restoration of skin. Skin tissue regeneration is mainly based on the use of suitable scaffold matrices. There are several scaffold types, such as porous, fibrous, microsphere, hydrogel, composite and acellular, etc., with discrete advantages and disadvantages. These scaffolds are either made up of highly biocompatible natural biomaterials, such as collagen, chitosan, etc., or synthetic materials, such as polycaprolactone (PCL), and poly-ethylene-glycol (PEG), etc. Composite scaffolds, which are a combination of natural or synthetic biomaterials, are highly biocompatible with improved tensile strength for effective skin tissue regeneration. Appropriate knowledge of the properties, advantages and disadvantages of various biomaterials and scaffolds will accelerate the production of suitable scaffolds for skin tissue regeneration applications. At the same time, emphasis on some of the leading challenges in the field of skin tissue engineering, such as cell interaction with scaffolds, faster cellular proliferation/differentiation, and vascularization of engineered tissues, is inevitable. In this review, we discuss various types of scaffolding approaches and biomaterials used in the field of skin tissue engineering and more importantly their future prospects in skin tissue regeneration efforts. MDPI 2016-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5187774/ /pubmed/27898014 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms17121974 Text en © 2016 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Chaudhari, Atul A.
Vig, Komal
Baganizi, Dieudonné Radé
Sahu, Rajnish
Dixit, Saurabh
Dennis, Vida
Singh, Shree Ram
Pillai, Shreekumar R.
Future Prospects for Scaffolding Methods and Biomaterials in Skin Tissue Engineering: A Review
title Future Prospects for Scaffolding Methods and Biomaterials in Skin Tissue Engineering: A Review
title_full Future Prospects for Scaffolding Methods and Biomaterials in Skin Tissue Engineering: A Review
title_fullStr Future Prospects for Scaffolding Methods and Biomaterials in Skin Tissue Engineering: A Review
title_full_unstemmed Future Prospects for Scaffolding Methods and Biomaterials in Skin Tissue Engineering: A Review
title_short Future Prospects for Scaffolding Methods and Biomaterials in Skin Tissue Engineering: A Review
title_sort future prospects for scaffolding methods and biomaterials in skin tissue engineering: a review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5187774/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27898014
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms17121974
work_keys_str_mv AT chaudhariatula futureprospectsforscaffoldingmethodsandbiomaterialsinskintissueengineeringareview
AT vigkomal futureprospectsforscaffoldingmethodsandbiomaterialsinskintissueengineeringareview
AT baganizidieudonnerade futureprospectsforscaffoldingmethodsandbiomaterialsinskintissueengineeringareview
AT sahurajnish futureprospectsforscaffoldingmethodsandbiomaterialsinskintissueengineeringareview
AT dixitsaurabh futureprospectsforscaffoldingmethodsandbiomaterialsinskintissueengineeringareview
AT dennisvida futureprospectsforscaffoldingmethodsandbiomaterialsinskintissueengineeringareview
AT singhshreeram futureprospectsforscaffoldingmethodsandbiomaterialsinskintissueengineeringareview
AT pillaishreekumarr futureprospectsforscaffoldingmethodsandbiomaterialsinskintissueengineeringareview