Cargando…
Future Prospects for Scaffolding Methods and Biomaterials in Skin Tissue Engineering: A Review
Over centuries, the field of regenerative skin tissue engineering has had several advancements to facilitate faster wound healing and thereby restoration of skin. Skin tissue regeneration is mainly based on the use of suitable scaffold matrices. There are several scaffold types, such as porous, fibr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5187774/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27898014 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms17121974 |
_version_ | 1782486894911684608 |
---|---|
author | Chaudhari, Atul A. Vig, Komal Baganizi, Dieudonné Radé Sahu, Rajnish Dixit, Saurabh Dennis, Vida Singh, Shree Ram Pillai, Shreekumar R. |
author_facet | Chaudhari, Atul A. Vig, Komal Baganizi, Dieudonné Radé Sahu, Rajnish Dixit, Saurabh Dennis, Vida Singh, Shree Ram Pillai, Shreekumar R. |
author_sort | Chaudhari, Atul A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Over centuries, the field of regenerative skin tissue engineering has had several advancements to facilitate faster wound healing and thereby restoration of skin. Skin tissue regeneration is mainly based on the use of suitable scaffold matrices. There are several scaffold types, such as porous, fibrous, microsphere, hydrogel, composite and acellular, etc., with discrete advantages and disadvantages. These scaffolds are either made up of highly biocompatible natural biomaterials, such as collagen, chitosan, etc., or synthetic materials, such as polycaprolactone (PCL), and poly-ethylene-glycol (PEG), etc. Composite scaffolds, which are a combination of natural or synthetic biomaterials, are highly biocompatible with improved tensile strength for effective skin tissue regeneration. Appropriate knowledge of the properties, advantages and disadvantages of various biomaterials and scaffolds will accelerate the production of suitable scaffolds for skin tissue regeneration applications. At the same time, emphasis on some of the leading challenges in the field of skin tissue engineering, such as cell interaction with scaffolds, faster cellular proliferation/differentiation, and vascularization of engineered tissues, is inevitable. In this review, we discuss various types of scaffolding approaches and biomaterials used in the field of skin tissue engineering and more importantly their future prospects in skin tissue regeneration efforts. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5187774 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51877742016-12-30 Future Prospects for Scaffolding Methods and Biomaterials in Skin Tissue Engineering: A Review Chaudhari, Atul A. Vig, Komal Baganizi, Dieudonné Radé Sahu, Rajnish Dixit, Saurabh Dennis, Vida Singh, Shree Ram Pillai, Shreekumar R. Int J Mol Sci Review Over centuries, the field of regenerative skin tissue engineering has had several advancements to facilitate faster wound healing and thereby restoration of skin. Skin tissue regeneration is mainly based on the use of suitable scaffold matrices. There are several scaffold types, such as porous, fibrous, microsphere, hydrogel, composite and acellular, etc., with discrete advantages and disadvantages. These scaffolds are either made up of highly biocompatible natural biomaterials, such as collagen, chitosan, etc., or synthetic materials, such as polycaprolactone (PCL), and poly-ethylene-glycol (PEG), etc. Composite scaffolds, which are a combination of natural or synthetic biomaterials, are highly biocompatible with improved tensile strength for effective skin tissue regeneration. Appropriate knowledge of the properties, advantages and disadvantages of various biomaterials and scaffolds will accelerate the production of suitable scaffolds for skin tissue regeneration applications. At the same time, emphasis on some of the leading challenges in the field of skin tissue engineering, such as cell interaction with scaffolds, faster cellular proliferation/differentiation, and vascularization of engineered tissues, is inevitable. In this review, we discuss various types of scaffolding approaches and biomaterials used in the field of skin tissue engineering and more importantly their future prospects in skin tissue regeneration efforts. MDPI 2016-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5187774/ /pubmed/27898014 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms17121974 Text en © 2016 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Chaudhari, Atul A. Vig, Komal Baganizi, Dieudonné Radé Sahu, Rajnish Dixit, Saurabh Dennis, Vida Singh, Shree Ram Pillai, Shreekumar R. Future Prospects for Scaffolding Methods and Biomaterials in Skin Tissue Engineering: A Review |
title | Future Prospects for Scaffolding Methods and Biomaterials in Skin Tissue Engineering: A Review |
title_full | Future Prospects for Scaffolding Methods and Biomaterials in Skin Tissue Engineering: A Review |
title_fullStr | Future Prospects for Scaffolding Methods and Biomaterials in Skin Tissue Engineering: A Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Future Prospects for Scaffolding Methods and Biomaterials in Skin Tissue Engineering: A Review |
title_short | Future Prospects for Scaffolding Methods and Biomaterials in Skin Tissue Engineering: A Review |
title_sort | future prospects for scaffolding methods and biomaterials in skin tissue engineering: a review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5187774/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27898014 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms17121974 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chaudhariatula futureprospectsforscaffoldingmethodsandbiomaterialsinskintissueengineeringareview AT vigkomal futureprospectsforscaffoldingmethodsandbiomaterialsinskintissueengineeringareview AT baganizidieudonnerade futureprospectsforscaffoldingmethodsandbiomaterialsinskintissueengineeringareview AT sahurajnish futureprospectsforscaffoldingmethodsandbiomaterialsinskintissueengineeringareview AT dixitsaurabh futureprospectsforscaffoldingmethodsandbiomaterialsinskintissueengineeringareview AT dennisvida futureprospectsforscaffoldingmethodsandbiomaterialsinskintissueengineeringareview AT singhshreeram futureprospectsforscaffoldingmethodsandbiomaterialsinskintissueengineeringareview AT pillaishreekumarr futureprospectsforscaffoldingmethodsandbiomaterialsinskintissueengineeringareview |