Cargando…
Assessing Reactive Strength Measures in Jumping and Hopping Using the Optojump™ System
The aim of this study was to assess the concurrent validity of the Optojump™ system (Microgate, Bolzano, Italy) versus a force platform in the estimation of temporal and reactive strength measures. In two separate investigations, twenty physically active males performed double-leg and single-leg dro...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
De Gruyter Open
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5187958/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28031754 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/hukin-2016-0032 |
_version_ | 1782486935082631168 |
---|---|
author | Healy, Robin Kenny, Ian C. Harrison, Andrew J. |
author_facet | Healy, Robin Kenny, Ian C. Harrison, Andrew J. |
author_sort | Healy, Robin |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aim of this study was to assess the concurrent validity of the Optojump™ system (Microgate, Bolzano, Italy) versus a force platform in the estimation of temporal and reactive strength measures. In two separate investigations, twenty physically active males performed double-leg and single-leg drop jumps from a box height of 0.3 m and a 10 s vertical bilateral hopping test. Contact time, flight time and total time (the sum of contact and flight time) were concurrently assessed during single and double-leg drop jumps and during hopping. Jump height, the reactive strength index and the reactive strength ratio were also calculated from contact time and flight time. Despite intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for all variables being close to 1 (ICC > 0.975), a significant overestimation was found in contact time (0.005 ± 0.002 s) and underestimations in flight time (0.005 ± 0.003 s), the reactive strength index (0.04 ± 0.02 m·s-1) and the reactive strength ratio (0.07 ± 0.04). Overestimations in contact time and underestimations in flight time were attributed to the physical design of the Optojump™ system as the transmitter and receiver units were positioned 0.003 m above the floor level. The Optojump™ demonstrated excellent overall temporal validity with no differences found between systems for total time. Coaches are advised to be consistent with the instrumentation used to assess athletes, however, in the case of comparison between reactive strength values collected with the Optojump™ and values collected with a force platform, regression equations are provided. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5187958 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | De Gruyter Open |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51879582016-12-28 Assessing Reactive Strength Measures in Jumping and Hopping Using the Optojump™ System Healy, Robin Kenny, Ian C. Harrison, Andrew J. J Hum Kinet Section I – Kinesiology The aim of this study was to assess the concurrent validity of the Optojump™ system (Microgate, Bolzano, Italy) versus a force platform in the estimation of temporal and reactive strength measures. In two separate investigations, twenty physically active males performed double-leg and single-leg drop jumps from a box height of 0.3 m and a 10 s vertical bilateral hopping test. Contact time, flight time and total time (the sum of contact and flight time) were concurrently assessed during single and double-leg drop jumps and during hopping. Jump height, the reactive strength index and the reactive strength ratio were also calculated from contact time and flight time. Despite intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for all variables being close to 1 (ICC > 0.975), a significant overestimation was found in contact time (0.005 ± 0.002 s) and underestimations in flight time (0.005 ± 0.003 s), the reactive strength index (0.04 ± 0.02 m·s-1) and the reactive strength ratio (0.07 ± 0.04). Overestimations in contact time and underestimations in flight time were attributed to the physical design of the Optojump™ system as the transmitter and receiver units were positioned 0.003 m above the floor level. The Optojump™ demonstrated excellent overall temporal validity with no differences found between systems for total time. Coaches are advised to be consistent with the instrumentation used to assess athletes, however, in the case of comparison between reactive strength values collected with the Optojump™ and values collected with a force platform, regression equations are provided. De Gruyter Open 2016-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5187958/ /pubmed/28031754 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/hukin-2016-0032 Text en © 2016 Editorial Committee of Journal of Human Kinetics |
spellingShingle | Section I – Kinesiology Healy, Robin Kenny, Ian C. Harrison, Andrew J. Assessing Reactive Strength Measures in Jumping and Hopping Using the Optojump™ System |
title | Assessing Reactive Strength Measures in Jumping and Hopping Using the Optojump™ System |
title_full | Assessing Reactive Strength Measures in Jumping and Hopping Using the Optojump™ System |
title_fullStr | Assessing Reactive Strength Measures in Jumping and Hopping Using the Optojump™ System |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessing Reactive Strength Measures in Jumping and Hopping Using the Optojump™ System |
title_short | Assessing Reactive Strength Measures in Jumping and Hopping Using the Optojump™ System |
title_sort | assessing reactive strength measures in jumping and hopping using the optojump™ system |
topic | Section I – Kinesiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5187958/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28031754 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/hukin-2016-0032 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT healyrobin assessingreactivestrengthmeasuresinjumpingandhoppingusingtheoptojumpsystem AT kennyianc assessingreactivestrengthmeasuresinjumpingandhoppingusingtheoptojumpsystem AT harrisonandrewj assessingreactivestrengthmeasuresinjumpingandhoppingusingtheoptojumpsystem |