Cargando…

Assessing Reactive Strength Measures in Jumping and Hopping Using the Optojump™ System

The aim of this study was to assess the concurrent validity of the Optojump™ system (Microgate, Bolzano, Italy) versus a force platform in the estimation of temporal and reactive strength measures. In two separate investigations, twenty physically active males performed double-leg and single-leg dro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Healy, Robin, Kenny, Ian C., Harrison, Andrew J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: De Gruyter Open 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5187958/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28031754
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/hukin-2016-0032
_version_ 1782486935082631168
author Healy, Robin
Kenny, Ian C.
Harrison, Andrew J.
author_facet Healy, Robin
Kenny, Ian C.
Harrison, Andrew J.
author_sort Healy, Robin
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study was to assess the concurrent validity of the Optojump™ system (Microgate, Bolzano, Italy) versus a force platform in the estimation of temporal and reactive strength measures. In two separate investigations, twenty physically active males performed double-leg and single-leg drop jumps from a box height of 0.3 m and a 10 s vertical bilateral hopping test. Contact time, flight time and total time (the sum of contact and flight time) were concurrently assessed during single and double-leg drop jumps and during hopping. Jump height, the reactive strength index and the reactive strength ratio were also calculated from contact time and flight time. Despite intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for all variables being close to 1 (ICC > 0.975), a significant overestimation was found in contact time (0.005 ± 0.002 s) and underestimations in flight time (0.005 ± 0.003 s), the reactive strength index (0.04 ± 0.02 m·s-1) and the reactive strength ratio (0.07 ± 0.04). Overestimations in contact time and underestimations in flight time were attributed to the physical design of the Optojump™ system as the transmitter and receiver units were positioned 0.003 m above the floor level. The Optojump™ demonstrated excellent overall temporal validity with no differences found between systems for total time. Coaches are advised to be consistent with the instrumentation used to assess athletes, however, in the case of comparison between reactive strength values collected with the Optojump™ and values collected with a force platform, regression equations are provided.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5187958
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher De Gruyter Open
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51879582016-12-28 Assessing Reactive Strength Measures in Jumping and Hopping Using the Optojump™ System Healy, Robin Kenny, Ian C. Harrison, Andrew J. J Hum Kinet Section I – Kinesiology The aim of this study was to assess the concurrent validity of the Optojump™ system (Microgate, Bolzano, Italy) versus a force platform in the estimation of temporal and reactive strength measures. In two separate investigations, twenty physically active males performed double-leg and single-leg drop jumps from a box height of 0.3 m and a 10 s vertical bilateral hopping test. Contact time, flight time and total time (the sum of contact and flight time) were concurrently assessed during single and double-leg drop jumps and during hopping. Jump height, the reactive strength index and the reactive strength ratio were also calculated from contact time and flight time. Despite intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for all variables being close to 1 (ICC > 0.975), a significant overestimation was found in contact time (0.005 ± 0.002 s) and underestimations in flight time (0.005 ± 0.003 s), the reactive strength index (0.04 ± 0.02 m·s-1) and the reactive strength ratio (0.07 ± 0.04). Overestimations in contact time and underestimations in flight time were attributed to the physical design of the Optojump™ system as the transmitter and receiver units were positioned 0.003 m above the floor level. The Optojump™ demonstrated excellent overall temporal validity with no differences found between systems for total time. Coaches are advised to be consistent with the instrumentation used to assess athletes, however, in the case of comparison between reactive strength values collected with the Optojump™ and values collected with a force platform, regression equations are provided. De Gruyter Open 2016-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5187958/ /pubmed/28031754 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/hukin-2016-0032 Text en © 2016 Editorial Committee of Journal of Human Kinetics
spellingShingle Section I – Kinesiology
Healy, Robin
Kenny, Ian C.
Harrison, Andrew J.
Assessing Reactive Strength Measures in Jumping and Hopping Using the Optojump™ System
title Assessing Reactive Strength Measures in Jumping and Hopping Using the Optojump™ System
title_full Assessing Reactive Strength Measures in Jumping and Hopping Using the Optojump™ System
title_fullStr Assessing Reactive Strength Measures in Jumping and Hopping Using the Optojump™ System
title_full_unstemmed Assessing Reactive Strength Measures in Jumping and Hopping Using the Optojump™ System
title_short Assessing Reactive Strength Measures in Jumping and Hopping Using the Optojump™ System
title_sort assessing reactive strength measures in jumping and hopping using the optojump™ system
topic Section I – Kinesiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5187958/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28031754
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/hukin-2016-0032
work_keys_str_mv AT healyrobin assessingreactivestrengthmeasuresinjumpingandhoppingusingtheoptojumpsystem
AT kennyianc assessingreactivestrengthmeasuresinjumpingandhoppingusingtheoptojumpsystem
AT harrisonandrewj assessingreactivestrengthmeasuresinjumpingandhoppingusingtheoptojumpsystem