Cargando…

Comparing ∆T(max) Determination Approaches for Granier-Based Sapflow Estimations

Granier-type thermal dissipation probes are common instruments for quantifying tree water use in forest hydrological studies. Estimating sapflow using Granier-type sapflow sensors requires determining the maximum temperature gradient (∆T(max)) between the heated probe and the reference probe below....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rabbel, Inken, Diekkrüger, Bernd, Voigt, Holm, Neuwirth, Burkhard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5191023/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27916949
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s16122042
_version_ 1782487538038996992
author Rabbel, Inken
Diekkrüger, Bernd
Voigt, Holm
Neuwirth, Burkhard
author_facet Rabbel, Inken
Diekkrüger, Bernd
Voigt, Holm
Neuwirth, Burkhard
author_sort Rabbel, Inken
collection PubMed
description Granier-type thermal dissipation probes are common instruments for quantifying tree water use in forest hydrological studies. Estimating sapflow using Granier-type sapflow sensors requires determining the maximum temperature gradient (∆T(max)) between the heated probe and the reference probe below. ∆T(max) represents a state of zero sap flux, which was originally assumed to occur each night leading to a ∆T(max) determination on a daily basis. However, researchers have proven that, under certain conditions, sapflow may continue throughout the night. Therefore alternative approaches to determining ∆T(max) have been developed. Multiple ∆T(max) approaches are now in use; however, sapflow estimates remain imprecise because the empirical equation that transfers the raw temperature signal (∆T) to sap flux density (F(d)) is strongly sensitive to ∆T(max). In this study, we analyze the effects of different ∆T(max) determination approaches on sub-daily, daily and (intra-)seasonal F(d) estimations. On this basis, we quantify the uncertainty of sapflow calculations, which is related to the raw signal processing. We show that the ∆T(max) determination procedure has a major influence on absolute ∆T(max) values and the respective sap flux density computations. Consequently, the choice of the ∆T(max) determination approach may be a significant source of uncertainty in sapflow estimations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5191023
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51910232017-01-03 Comparing ∆T(max) Determination Approaches for Granier-Based Sapflow Estimations Rabbel, Inken Diekkrüger, Bernd Voigt, Holm Neuwirth, Burkhard Sensors (Basel) Article Granier-type thermal dissipation probes are common instruments for quantifying tree water use in forest hydrological studies. Estimating sapflow using Granier-type sapflow sensors requires determining the maximum temperature gradient (∆T(max)) between the heated probe and the reference probe below. ∆T(max) represents a state of zero sap flux, which was originally assumed to occur each night leading to a ∆T(max) determination on a daily basis. However, researchers have proven that, under certain conditions, sapflow may continue throughout the night. Therefore alternative approaches to determining ∆T(max) have been developed. Multiple ∆T(max) approaches are now in use; however, sapflow estimates remain imprecise because the empirical equation that transfers the raw temperature signal (∆T) to sap flux density (F(d)) is strongly sensitive to ∆T(max). In this study, we analyze the effects of different ∆T(max) determination approaches on sub-daily, daily and (intra-)seasonal F(d) estimations. On this basis, we quantify the uncertainty of sapflow calculations, which is related to the raw signal processing. We show that the ∆T(max) determination procedure has a major influence on absolute ∆T(max) values and the respective sap flux density computations. Consequently, the choice of the ∆T(max) determination approach may be a significant source of uncertainty in sapflow estimations. MDPI 2016-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5191023/ /pubmed/27916949 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s16122042 Text en © 2016 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Rabbel, Inken
Diekkrüger, Bernd
Voigt, Holm
Neuwirth, Burkhard
Comparing ∆T(max) Determination Approaches for Granier-Based Sapflow Estimations
title Comparing ∆T(max) Determination Approaches for Granier-Based Sapflow Estimations
title_full Comparing ∆T(max) Determination Approaches for Granier-Based Sapflow Estimations
title_fullStr Comparing ∆T(max) Determination Approaches for Granier-Based Sapflow Estimations
title_full_unstemmed Comparing ∆T(max) Determination Approaches for Granier-Based Sapflow Estimations
title_short Comparing ∆T(max) Determination Approaches for Granier-Based Sapflow Estimations
title_sort comparing ∆t(max) determination approaches for granier-based sapflow estimations
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5191023/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27916949
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s16122042
work_keys_str_mv AT rabbelinken comparingtmaxdeterminationapproachesforgranierbasedsapflowestimations
AT diekkrugerbernd comparingtmaxdeterminationapproachesforgranierbasedsapflowestimations
AT voigtholm comparingtmaxdeterminationapproachesforgranierbasedsapflowestimations
AT neuwirthburkhard comparingtmaxdeterminationapproachesforgranierbasedsapflowestimations