Cargando…
Comparing ∆T(max) Determination Approaches for Granier-Based Sapflow Estimations
Granier-type thermal dissipation probes are common instruments for quantifying tree water use in forest hydrological studies. Estimating sapflow using Granier-type sapflow sensors requires determining the maximum temperature gradient (∆T(max)) between the heated probe and the reference probe below....
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5191023/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27916949 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s16122042 |
_version_ | 1782487538038996992 |
---|---|
author | Rabbel, Inken Diekkrüger, Bernd Voigt, Holm Neuwirth, Burkhard |
author_facet | Rabbel, Inken Diekkrüger, Bernd Voigt, Holm Neuwirth, Burkhard |
author_sort | Rabbel, Inken |
collection | PubMed |
description | Granier-type thermal dissipation probes are common instruments for quantifying tree water use in forest hydrological studies. Estimating sapflow using Granier-type sapflow sensors requires determining the maximum temperature gradient (∆T(max)) between the heated probe and the reference probe below. ∆T(max) represents a state of zero sap flux, which was originally assumed to occur each night leading to a ∆T(max) determination on a daily basis. However, researchers have proven that, under certain conditions, sapflow may continue throughout the night. Therefore alternative approaches to determining ∆T(max) have been developed. Multiple ∆T(max) approaches are now in use; however, sapflow estimates remain imprecise because the empirical equation that transfers the raw temperature signal (∆T) to sap flux density (F(d)) is strongly sensitive to ∆T(max). In this study, we analyze the effects of different ∆T(max) determination approaches on sub-daily, daily and (intra-)seasonal F(d) estimations. On this basis, we quantify the uncertainty of sapflow calculations, which is related to the raw signal processing. We show that the ∆T(max) determination procedure has a major influence on absolute ∆T(max) values and the respective sap flux density computations. Consequently, the choice of the ∆T(max) determination approach may be a significant source of uncertainty in sapflow estimations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5191023 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51910232017-01-03 Comparing ∆T(max) Determination Approaches for Granier-Based Sapflow Estimations Rabbel, Inken Diekkrüger, Bernd Voigt, Holm Neuwirth, Burkhard Sensors (Basel) Article Granier-type thermal dissipation probes are common instruments for quantifying tree water use in forest hydrological studies. Estimating sapflow using Granier-type sapflow sensors requires determining the maximum temperature gradient (∆T(max)) between the heated probe and the reference probe below. ∆T(max) represents a state of zero sap flux, which was originally assumed to occur each night leading to a ∆T(max) determination on a daily basis. However, researchers have proven that, under certain conditions, sapflow may continue throughout the night. Therefore alternative approaches to determining ∆T(max) have been developed. Multiple ∆T(max) approaches are now in use; however, sapflow estimates remain imprecise because the empirical equation that transfers the raw temperature signal (∆T) to sap flux density (F(d)) is strongly sensitive to ∆T(max). In this study, we analyze the effects of different ∆T(max) determination approaches on sub-daily, daily and (intra-)seasonal F(d) estimations. On this basis, we quantify the uncertainty of sapflow calculations, which is related to the raw signal processing. We show that the ∆T(max) determination procedure has a major influence on absolute ∆T(max) values and the respective sap flux density computations. Consequently, the choice of the ∆T(max) determination approach may be a significant source of uncertainty in sapflow estimations. MDPI 2016-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5191023/ /pubmed/27916949 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s16122042 Text en © 2016 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Rabbel, Inken Diekkrüger, Bernd Voigt, Holm Neuwirth, Burkhard Comparing ∆T(max) Determination Approaches for Granier-Based Sapflow Estimations |
title | Comparing ∆T(max) Determination Approaches for Granier-Based Sapflow Estimations |
title_full | Comparing ∆T(max) Determination Approaches for Granier-Based Sapflow Estimations |
title_fullStr | Comparing ∆T(max) Determination Approaches for Granier-Based Sapflow Estimations |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing ∆T(max) Determination Approaches for Granier-Based Sapflow Estimations |
title_short | Comparing ∆T(max) Determination Approaches for Granier-Based Sapflow Estimations |
title_sort | comparing ∆t(max) determination approaches for granier-based sapflow estimations |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5191023/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27916949 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s16122042 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rabbelinken comparingtmaxdeterminationapproachesforgranierbasedsapflowestimations AT diekkrugerbernd comparingtmaxdeterminationapproachesforgranierbasedsapflowestimations AT voigtholm comparingtmaxdeterminationapproachesforgranierbasedsapflowestimations AT neuwirthburkhard comparingtmaxdeterminationapproachesforgranierbasedsapflowestimations |