Cargando…

Estimation of Full-Body Poses Using Only Five Inertial Sensors: An Eager or Lazy Learning Approach?

Human movement analysis has become easier with the wide availability of motion capture systems. Inertial sensing has made it possible to capture human motion without external infrastructure, therefore allowing measurements in any environment. As high-quality motion capture data is available in large...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wouda, Frank J., Giuberti, Matteo, Bellusci, Giovanni, Veltink, Peter H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5191118/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27983676
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s16122138
_version_ 1782487560752201728
author Wouda, Frank J.
Giuberti, Matteo
Bellusci, Giovanni
Veltink, Peter H.
author_facet Wouda, Frank J.
Giuberti, Matteo
Bellusci, Giovanni
Veltink, Peter H.
author_sort Wouda, Frank J.
collection PubMed
description Human movement analysis has become easier with the wide availability of motion capture systems. Inertial sensing has made it possible to capture human motion without external infrastructure, therefore allowing measurements in any environment. As high-quality motion capture data is available in large quantities, this creates possibilities to further simplify hardware setups, by use of data-driven methods to decrease the number of body-worn sensors. In this work, we contribute to this field by analyzing the capabilities of using either artificial neural networks (eager learning) or nearest neighbor search (lazy learning) for such a problem. Sparse orientation features, resulting from sensor fusion of only five inertial measurement units with magnetometers, are mapped to full-body poses. Both eager and lazy learning algorithms are shown to be capable of constructing this mapping. The full-body output poses are visually plausible with an average joint position error of approximately 7 cm, and average joint angle error of 7 [Formula: see text]. Additionally, the effects of magnetic disturbances typical in orientation tracking on the estimation of full-body poses was also investigated, where nearest neighbor search showed better performance for such disturbances.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5191118
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51911182017-01-03 Estimation of Full-Body Poses Using Only Five Inertial Sensors: An Eager or Lazy Learning Approach? Wouda, Frank J. Giuberti, Matteo Bellusci, Giovanni Veltink, Peter H. Sensors (Basel) Article Human movement analysis has become easier with the wide availability of motion capture systems. Inertial sensing has made it possible to capture human motion without external infrastructure, therefore allowing measurements in any environment. As high-quality motion capture data is available in large quantities, this creates possibilities to further simplify hardware setups, by use of data-driven methods to decrease the number of body-worn sensors. In this work, we contribute to this field by analyzing the capabilities of using either artificial neural networks (eager learning) or nearest neighbor search (lazy learning) for such a problem. Sparse orientation features, resulting from sensor fusion of only five inertial measurement units with magnetometers, are mapped to full-body poses. Both eager and lazy learning algorithms are shown to be capable of constructing this mapping. The full-body output poses are visually plausible with an average joint position error of approximately 7 cm, and average joint angle error of 7 [Formula: see text]. Additionally, the effects of magnetic disturbances typical in orientation tracking on the estimation of full-body poses was also investigated, where nearest neighbor search showed better performance for such disturbances. MDPI 2016-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5191118/ /pubmed/27983676 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s16122138 Text en © 2016 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Wouda, Frank J.
Giuberti, Matteo
Bellusci, Giovanni
Veltink, Peter H.
Estimation of Full-Body Poses Using Only Five Inertial Sensors: An Eager or Lazy Learning Approach?
title Estimation of Full-Body Poses Using Only Five Inertial Sensors: An Eager or Lazy Learning Approach?
title_full Estimation of Full-Body Poses Using Only Five Inertial Sensors: An Eager or Lazy Learning Approach?
title_fullStr Estimation of Full-Body Poses Using Only Five Inertial Sensors: An Eager or Lazy Learning Approach?
title_full_unstemmed Estimation of Full-Body Poses Using Only Five Inertial Sensors: An Eager or Lazy Learning Approach?
title_short Estimation of Full-Body Poses Using Only Five Inertial Sensors: An Eager or Lazy Learning Approach?
title_sort estimation of full-body poses using only five inertial sensors: an eager or lazy learning approach?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5191118/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27983676
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s16122138
work_keys_str_mv AT woudafrankj estimationoffullbodyposesusingonlyfiveinertialsensorsaneagerorlazylearningapproach
AT giubertimatteo estimationoffullbodyposesusingonlyfiveinertialsensorsaneagerorlazylearningapproach
AT belluscigiovanni estimationoffullbodyposesusingonlyfiveinertialsensorsaneagerorlazylearningapproach
AT veltinkpeterh estimationoffullbodyposesusingonlyfiveinertialsensorsaneagerorlazylearningapproach