Cargando…

Separation of Peptides with Forward Osmosis Biomimetic Membranes

Forward osmosis (FO) membranes have gained interest in several disciplines for the rejection and concentration of various molecules. One application area for FO membranes that is becoming increasingly popular is the use of the membranes to concentrate or dilute high value compound solutions such as...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bajraktari, Niada, Madsen, Henrik T., Gruber, Mathias F., Truelsen, Sigurd, Jensen, Elzbieta L., Jensen, Henrik, Hélix-Nielsen, Claus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5192402/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27854275
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes6040046
_version_ 1782487768358715392
author Bajraktari, Niada
Madsen, Henrik T.
Gruber, Mathias F.
Truelsen, Sigurd
Jensen, Elzbieta L.
Jensen, Henrik
Hélix-Nielsen, Claus
author_facet Bajraktari, Niada
Madsen, Henrik T.
Gruber, Mathias F.
Truelsen, Sigurd
Jensen, Elzbieta L.
Jensen, Henrik
Hélix-Nielsen, Claus
author_sort Bajraktari, Niada
collection PubMed
description Forward osmosis (FO) membranes have gained interest in several disciplines for the rejection and concentration of various molecules. One application area for FO membranes that is becoming increasingly popular is the use of the membranes to concentrate or dilute high value compound solutions such as pharmaceuticals. It is crucial in such settings to control the transport over the membrane to avoid losses of valuable compounds, but little is known about the rejection and transport mechanisms of larger biomolecules with often flexible conformations. In this study, transport of two chemically similar peptides with molecular weight (M(w)) of 375 and 692 Da across a thin film composite Aquaporin Inside™ Membrane (AIM) FO membrane was investigated. Despite the relative large size, both peptides were able to permeate the dense active layer of the AIM membrane and the transport mechanism was determined to be diffusion-based. Interestingly, the membrane permeability increased 3.65 times for the 692 Da peptide (1.39 × 10(−12) m(2)·s(−1)) compared to the 375 Da peptide (0.38 × 10(−12) m(2)·s(−1)). This increase thus occurs for an 85% increase in Mw but only for a 34% increase in peptide radius of gyration (R(g)) as determined from molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. This suggests that R(g) is a strong influencing factor for membrane permeability. Thus, an increased R(g) reflects the larger peptide chains ability to sample a larger conformational space when interacting with the nanostructured active layer increasing the likelihood for permeation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5192402
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51924022017-01-03 Separation of Peptides with Forward Osmosis Biomimetic Membranes Bajraktari, Niada Madsen, Henrik T. Gruber, Mathias F. Truelsen, Sigurd Jensen, Elzbieta L. Jensen, Henrik Hélix-Nielsen, Claus Membranes (Basel) Article Forward osmosis (FO) membranes have gained interest in several disciplines for the rejection and concentration of various molecules. One application area for FO membranes that is becoming increasingly popular is the use of the membranes to concentrate or dilute high value compound solutions such as pharmaceuticals. It is crucial in such settings to control the transport over the membrane to avoid losses of valuable compounds, but little is known about the rejection and transport mechanisms of larger biomolecules with often flexible conformations. In this study, transport of two chemically similar peptides with molecular weight (M(w)) of 375 and 692 Da across a thin film composite Aquaporin Inside™ Membrane (AIM) FO membrane was investigated. Despite the relative large size, both peptides were able to permeate the dense active layer of the AIM membrane and the transport mechanism was determined to be diffusion-based. Interestingly, the membrane permeability increased 3.65 times for the 692 Da peptide (1.39 × 10(−12) m(2)·s(−1)) compared to the 375 Da peptide (0.38 × 10(−12) m(2)·s(−1)). This increase thus occurs for an 85% increase in Mw but only for a 34% increase in peptide radius of gyration (R(g)) as determined from molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. This suggests that R(g) is a strong influencing factor for membrane permeability. Thus, an increased R(g) reflects the larger peptide chains ability to sample a larger conformational space when interacting with the nanostructured active layer increasing the likelihood for permeation. MDPI 2016-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5192402/ /pubmed/27854275 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes6040046 Text en © 2016 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Bajraktari, Niada
Madsen, Henrik T.
Gruber, Mathias F.
Truelsen, Sigurd
Jensen, Elzbieta L.
Jensen, Henrik
Hélix-Nielsen, Claus
Separation of Peptides with Forward Osmosis Biomimetic Membranes
title Separation of Peptides with Forward Osmosis Biomimetic Membranes
title_full Separation of Peptides with Forward Osmosis Biomimetic Membranes
title_fullStr Separation of Peptides with Forward Osmosis Biomimetic Membranes
title_full_unstemmed Separation of Peptides with Forward Osmosis Biomimetic Membranes
title_short Separation of Peptides with Forward Osmosis Biomimetic Membranes
title_sort separation of peptides with forward osmosis biomimetic membranes
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5192402/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27854275
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes6040046
work_keys_str_mv AT bajraktariniada separationofpeptideswithforwardosmosisbiomimeticmembranes
AT madsenhenrikt separationofpeptideswithforwardosmosisbiomimeticmembranes
AT grubermathiasf separationofpeptideswithforwardosmosisbiomimeticmembranes
AT truelsensigurd separationofpeptideswithforwardosmosisbiomimeticmembranes
AT jensenelzbietal separationofpeptideswithforwardosmosisbiomimeticmembranes
AT jensenhenrik separationofpeptideswithforwardosmosisbiomimeticmembranes
AT helixnielsenclaus separationofpeptideswithforwardosmosisbiomimeticmembranes