Cargando…

Prognostic factors and failure patterns in non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma after intensity-modulated radiotherapy

BACKGROUND: The prognostic values of staging parameters require continual re-assessment amid changes in diagnostic and therapeutic methods. This study aimed to identify the prognostic factors and failure patterns of non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) in the intensity-modulated radiotherap...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mao, Yan-Ping, Tang, Ling-Long, Chen, Lei, Sun, Ying, Qi, Zhen-Yu, Zhou, Guan-Qun, Liu, Li-Zhi, Li, Li, Lin, Ai-Hua, Ma, Jun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5192583/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28031050
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40880-016-0167-2
_version_ 1782487805967990784
author Mao, Yan-Ping
Tang, Ling-Long
Chen, Lei
Sun, Ying
Qi, Zhen-Yu
Zhou, Guan-Qun
Liu, Li-Zhi
Li, Li
Lin, Ai-Hua
Ma, Jun
author_facet Mao, Yan-Ping
Tang, Ling-Long
Chen, Lei
Sun, Ying
Qi, Zhen-Yu
Zhou, Guan-Qun
Liu, Li-Zhi
Li, Li
Lin, Ai-Hua
Ma, Jun
author_sort Mao, Yan-Ping
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The prognostic values of staging parameters require continual re-assessment amid changes in diagnostic and therapeutic methods. This study aimed to identify the prognostic factors and failure patterns of non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) in the intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) era. METHODS: We reviewed the data from 749 patients with newly diagnosed, biopsy-proven, non-metastatic NPC in our cancer center (South China, an NPC endemic area) between January 2003 and December 2007. All patients underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) before receiving IMRT. The actuarial survival rates were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method, and survival curves were compared using the log-rank test. Multivariate analyses with the Cox proportional hazards model were used to test for the independent prognostic factors by backward eliminating insignificant explanatory variables. RESULTS: The 5-year occurrence rates of local failure, regional failure, locoregional failure, and distant failure were 5.4, 3.0, 7.4, and 17.4%, respectively. The 5-year survival rates were as follows: local relapse-free survival, 94.6%; nodal relapse-free survival, 97.0%; distant metastasis-free survival, 82.6%; disease-free survival, 75.1%; and overall survival, 82.0%. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that orbit involvement was the only significant prognostic factor for local failure (P = 0.011). Parapharyngeal tumor extension, retropharyngeal lymph node involvement, and the laterality, longest diameter, and Ho’s location of the cervical lymph nodes were significant prognostic factors for both distant failure and disease failure (all P < 0.05). Intracranial extension had significant prognostic value for distant failure (P = 0.040). CONCLUSIONS: The key failure pattern for NPC was distant metastasis in the IMRT era. With changes in diagnostic and therapeutic technologies as well as treatment modalities, the significant prognostic parameters for local control have also been altered substantially.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5192583
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51925832016-12-29 Prognostic factors and failure patterns in non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma after intensity-modulated radiotherapy Mao, Yan-Ping Tang, Ling-Long Chen, Lei Sun, Ying Qi, Zhen-Yu Zhou, Guan-Qun Liu, Li-Zhi Li, Li Lin, Ai-Hua Ma, Jun Chin J Cancer Original Article BACKGROUND: The prognostic values of staging parameters require continual re-assessment amid changes in diagnostic and therapeutic methods. This study aimed to identify the prognostic factors and failure patterns of non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) in the intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) era. METHODS: We reviewed the data from 749 patients with newly diagnosed, biopsy-proven, non-metastatic NPC in our cancer center (South China, an NPC endemic area) between January 2003 and December 2007. All patients underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) before receiving IMRT. The actuarial survival rates were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method, and survival curves were compared using the log-rank test. Multivariate analyses with the Cox proportional hazards model were used to test for the independent prognostic factors by backward eliminating insignificant explanatory variables. RESULTS: The 5-year occurrence rates of local failure, regional failure, locoregional failure, and distant failure were 5.4, 3.0, 7.4, and 17.4%, respectively. The 5-year survival rates were as follows: local relapse-free survival, 94.6%; nodal relapse-free survival, 97.0%; distant metastasis-free survival, 82.6%; disease-free survival, 75.1%; and overall survival, 82.0%. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that orbit involvement was the only significant prognostic factor for local failure (P = 0.011). Parapharyngeal tumor extension, retropharyngeal lymph node involvement, and the laterality, longest diameter, and Ho’s location of the cervical lymph nodes were significant prognostic factors for both distant failure and disease failure (all P < 0.05). Intracranial extension had significant prognostic value for distant failure (P = 0.040). CONCLUSIONS: The key failure pattern for NPC was distant metastasis in the IMRT era. With changes in diagnostic and therapeutic technologies as well as treatment modalities, the significant prognostic parameters for local control have also been altered substantially. BioMed Central 2016-12-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5192583/ /pubmed/28031050 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40880-016-0167-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Original Article
Mao, Yan-Ping
Tang, Ling-Long
Chen, Lei
Sun, Ying
Qi, Zhen-Yu
Zhou, Guan-Qun
Liu, Li-Zhi
Li, Li
Lin, Ai-Hua
Ma, Jun
Prognostic factors and failure patterns in non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma after intensity-modulated radiotherapy
title Prognostic factors and failure patterns in non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma after intensity-modulated radiotherapy
title_full Prognostic factors and failure patterns in non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma after intensity-modulated radiotherapy
title_fullStr Prognostic factors and failure patterns in non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma after intensity-modulated radiotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic factors and failure patterns in non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma after intensity-modulated radiotherapy
title_short Prognostic factors and failure patterns in non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma after intensity-modulated radiotherapy
title_sort prognostic factors and failure patterns in non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma after intensity-modulated radiotherapy
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5192583/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28031050
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40880-016-0167-2
work_keys_str_mv AT maoyanping prognosticfactorsandfailurepatternsinnonmetastaticnasopharyngealcarcinomaafterintensitymodulatedradiotherapy
AT tanglinglong prognosticfactorsandfailurepatternsinnonmetastaticnasopharyngealcarcinomaafterintensitymodulatedradiotherapy
AT chenlei prognosticfactorsandfailurepatternsinnonmetastaticnasopharyngealcarcinomaafterintensitymodulatedradiotherapy
AT sunying prognosticfactorsandfailurepatternsinnonmetastaticnasopharyngealcarcinomaafterintensitymodulatedradiotherapy
AT qizhenyu prognosticfactorsandfailurepatternsinnonmetastaticnasopharyngealcarcinomaafterintensitymodulatedradiotherapy
AT zhouguanqun prognosticfactorsandfailurepatternsinnonmetastaticnasopharyngealcarcinomaafterintensitymodulatedradiotherapy
AT liulizhi prognosticfactorsandfailurepatternsinnonmetastaticnasopharyngealcarcinomaafterintensitymodulatedradiotherapy
AT lili prognosticfactorsandfailurepatternsinnonmetastaticnasopharyngealcarcinomaafterintensitymodulatedradiotherapy
AT linaihua prognosticfactorsandfailurepatternsinnonmetastaticnasopharyngealcarcinomaafterintensitymodulatedradiotherapy
AT majun prognosticfactorsandfailurepatternsinnonmetastaticnasopharyngealcarcinomaafterintensitymodulatedradiotherapy