Cargando…
Current and future ozone risks to global terrestrial biodiversity and ecosystem processes
Risks associated with exposure of individual plant species to ozone (O(3)) are well documented, but implications for terrestrial biodiversity and ecosystem processes have received insufficient attention. This is an important gap because feedbacks to the atmosphere may change as future O(3) levels in...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5192800/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28035269 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2568 |
_version_ | 1782487847797784576 |
---|---|
author | Fuhrer, Jürg Val Martin, Maria Mills, Gina Heald, Colette L. Harmens, Harry Hayes, Felicity Sharps, Katrina Bender, Jürgen Ashmore, Mike R. |
author_facet | Fuhrer, Jürg Val Martin, Maria Mills, Gina Heald, Colette L. Harmens, Harry Hayes, Felicity Sharps, Katrina Bender, Jürgen Ashmore, Mike R. |
author_sort | Fuhrer, Jürg |
collection | PubMed |
description | Risks associated with exposure of individual plant species to ozone (O(3)) are well documented, but implications for terrestrial biodiversity and ecosystem processes have received insufficient attention. This is an important gap because feedbacks to the atmosphere may change as future O(3) levels increase or decrease, depending on air quality and climate policies. Global simulation of O(3) using the Community Earth System Model (CESM) revealed that in 2000, about 40% of the Global 200 terrestrial ecoregions (ER) were exposed to O(3) above thresholds for ecological risks, with highest exposures in North America and Southern Europe, where there is field evidence of adverse effects of O(3), and in central Asia. Experimental studies show that O(3) can adversely affect the growth and flowering of plants and alter species composition and richness, although some communities can be resilient. Additional effects include changes in water flux regulation, pollination efficiency, and plant pathogen development. Recent research is unraveling a range of effects belowground, including changes in soil invertebrates, plant litter quantity and quality, decomposition, and nutrient cycling and carbon pools. Changes are likely slow and may take decades to become detectable. CESM simulations for 2050 show that O(3) exposure under emission scenario RCP8.5 increases in all major biomes and that policies represented in scenario RCP4.5 do not lead to a general reduction in O(3) risks; rather, 50% of ERs still show an increase in exposure. Although a conceptual model is lacking to extrapolate documented effects to ERs with limited or no local information, and there is uncertainty about interactions with nitrogen input and climate change, the analysis suggests that in many ERs, O(3) risks will persist for biodiversity at different trophic levels, and for a range of ecosystem processes and feedbacks, which deserves more attention when assessing ecological implications of future atmospheric pollution and climate change. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5192800 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51928002016-12-29 Current and future ozone risks to global terrestrial biodiversity and ecosystem processes Fuhrer, Jürg Val Martin, Maria Mills, Gina Heald, Colette L. Harmens, Harry Hayes, Felicity Sharps, Katrina Bender, Jürgen Ashmore, Mike R. Ecol Evol Review Risks associated with exposure of individual plant species to ozone (O(3)) are well documented, but implications for terrestrial biodiversity and ecosystem processes have received insufficient attention. This is an important gap because feedbacks to the atmosphere may change as future O(3) levels increase or decrease, depending on air quality and climate policies. Global simulation of O(3) using the Community Earth System Model (CESM) revealed that in 2000, about 40% of the Global 200 terrestrial ecoregions (ER) were exposed to O(3) above thresholds for ecological risks, with highest exposures in North America and Southern Europe, where there is field evidence of adverse effects of O(3), and in central Asia. Experimental studies show that O(3) can adversely affect the growth and flowering of plants and alter species composition and richness, although some communities can be resilient. Additional effects include changes in water flux regulation, pollination efficiency, and plant pathogen development. Recent research is unraveling a range of effects belowground, including changes in soil invertebrates, plant litter quantity and quality, decomposition, and nutrient cycling and carbon pools. Changes are likely slow and may take decades to become detectable. CESM simulations for 2050 show that O(3) exposure under emission scenario RCP8.5 increases in all major biomes and that policies represented in scenario RCP4.5 do not lead to a general reduction in O(3) risks; rather, 50% of ERs still show an increase in exposure. Although a conceptual model is lacking to extrapolate documented effects to ERs with limited or no local information, and there is uncertainty about interactions with nitrogen input and climate change, the analysis suggests that in many ERs, O(3) risks will persist for biodiversity at different trophic levels, and for a range of ecosystem processes and feedbacks, which deserves more attention when assessing ecological implications of future atmospheric pollution and climate change. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5192800/ /pubmed/28035269 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2568 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Fuhrer, Jürg Val Martin, Maria Mills, Gina Heald, Colette L. Harmens, Harry Hayes, Felicity Sharps, Katrina Bender, Jürgen Ashmore, Mike R. Current and future ozone risks to global terrestrial biodiversity and ecosystem processes |
title | Current and future ozone risks to global terrestrial biodiversity and ecosystem processes |
title_full | Current and future ozone risks to global terrestrial biodiversity and ecosystem processes |
title_fullStr | Current and future ozone risks to global terrestrial biodiversity and ecosystem processes |
title_full_unstemmed | Current and future ozone risks to global terrestrial biodiversity and ecosystem processes |
title_short | Current and future ozone risks to global terrestrial biodiversity and ecosystem processes |
title_sort | current and future ozone risks to global terrestrial biodiversity and ecosystem processes |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5192800/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28035269 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2568 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fuhrerjurg currentandfutureozoneriskstoglobalterrestrialbiodiversityandecosystemprocesses AT valmartinmaria currentandfutureozoneriskstoglobalterrestrialbiodiversityandecosystemprocesses AT millsgina currentandfutureozoneriskstoglobalterrestrialbiodiversityandecosystemprocesses AT healdcolettel currentandfutureozoneriskstoglobalterrestrialbiodiversityandecosystemprocesses AT harmensharry currentandfutureozoneriskstoglobalterrestrialbiodiversityandecosystemprocesses AT hayesfelicity currentandfutureozoneriskstoglobalterrestrialbiodiversityandecosystemprocesses AT sharpskatrina currentandfutureozoneriskstoglobalterrestrialbiodiversityandecosystemprocesses AT benderjurgen currentandfutureozoneriskstoglobalterrestrialbiodiversityandecosystemprocesses AT ashmoremiker currentandfutureozoneriskstoglobalterrestrialbiodiversityandecosystemprocesses |