Cargando…

The challenge of separating signatures of local adaptation from those of isolation by distance and colonization history: The case of two white pines

Accurately detecting signatures of local adaptation using genetic‐environment associations (GEAs) requires controlling for neutral patterns of population structure to reduce the risk of false positives. However, a high degree of collinearity between climatic gradients and neutral population structur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nadeau, Simon, Meirmans, Patrick G., Aitken, Sally N., Ritland, Kermit, Isabel, Nathalie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5192886/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28035257
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2550
_version_ 1782487864381014016
author Nadeau, Simon
Meirmans, Patrick G.
Aitken, Sally N.
Ritland, Kermit
Isabel, Nathalie
author_facet Nadeau, Simon
Meirmans, Patrick G.
Aitken, Sally N.
Ritland, Kermit
Isabel, Nathalie
author_sort Nadeau, Simon
collection PubMed
description Accurately detecting signatures of local adaptation using genetic‐environment associations (GEAs) requires controlling for neutral patterns of population structure to reduce the risk of false positives. However, a high degree of collinearity between climatic gradients and neutral population structure can greatly reduce power, and the performance of GEA methods in such case is rarely evaluated in empirical studies. In this study, we attempted to disentangle the effects of local adaptation and isolation by environment (IBE) from those of isolation by distance (IBD) and isolation by colonization from glacial refugia (IBC) using range‐wide samples in two white pine species. For this, SNPs from 168 genes, including 52 candidate genes for growth and phenology, were genotyped in 133 and 61 populations of Pinus strobus and P. monticola, respectively. For P. strobus and using all 153 SNPs, climate (IBE) did not significantly explained among‐population variation when controlling for IBD and IBC in redundancy analyses (RDAs). However, 26 SNPs were significantly associated with climate in single‐locus GEA analyses (Bayenv2 and LFMM), suggesting that local adaptation took place in the presence of high gene flow. For P. monticola, we found no evidence of IBE using RDAs and weaker signatures of local adaptation using GEA and F (ST) outlier tests, consistent with adaptation via phenotypic plasticity. In both species, the majority of the explained among‐population variation (69 to 96%) could not be partitioned between the effects of IBE, IBD, and IBC. GEA methods can account differently for this confounded variation, and this could explain the small overlap of SNPs detected between Bayenv2 and LFMM. Our study illustrates the inherent difficulty of taking into account neutral structure in natural populations and the importance of sampling designs that maximize climatic variation, while minimizing collinearity between climatic gradients and neutral structure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5192886
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51928862016-12-29 The challenge of separating signatures of local adaptation from those of isolation by distance and colonization history: The case of two white pines Nadeau, Simon Meirmans, Patrick G. Aitken, Sally N. Ritland, Kermit Isabel, Nathalie Ecol Evol Original Research Accurately detecting signatures of local adaptation using genetic‐environment associations (GEAs) requires controlling for neutral patterns of population structure to reduce the risk of false positives. However, a high degree of collinearity between climatic gradients and neutral population structure can greatly reduce power, and the performance of GEA methods in such case is rarely evaluated in empirical studies. In this study, we attempted to disentangle the effects of local adaptation and isolation by environment (IBE) from those of isolation by distance (IBD) and isolation by colonization from glacial refugia (IBC) using range‐wide samples in two white pine species. For this, SNPs from 168 genes, including 52 candidate genes for growth and phenology, were genotyped in 133 and 61 populations of Pinus strobus and P. monticola, respectively. For P. strobus and using all 153 SNPs, climate (IBE) did not significantly explained among‐population variation when controlling for IBD and IBC in redundancy analyses (RDAs). However, 26 SNPs were significantly associated with climate in single‐locus GEA analyses (Bayenv2 and LFMM), suggesting that local adaptation took place in the presence of high gene flow. For P. monticola, we found no evidence of IBE using RDAs and weaker signatures of local adaptation using GEA and F (ST) outlier tests, consistent with adaptation via phenotypic plasticity. In both species, the majority of the explained among‐population variation (69 to 96%) could not be partitioned between the effects of IBE, IBD, and IBC. GEA methods can account differently for this confounded variation, and this could explain the small overlap of SNPs detected between Bayenv2 and LFMM. Our study illustrates the inherent difficulty of taking into account neutral structure in natural populations and the importance of sampling designs that maximize climatic variation, while minimizing collinearity between climatic gradients and neutral structure. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5192886/ /pubmed/28035257 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2550 Text en © 2016 Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Nadeau, Simon
Meirmans, Patrick G.
Aitken, Sally N.
Ritland, Kermit
Isabel, Nathalie
The challenge of separating signatures of local adaptation from those of isolation by distance and colonization history: The case of two white pines
title The challenge of separating signatures of local adaptation from those of isolation by distance and colonization history: The case of two white pines
title_full The challenge of separating signatures of local adaptation from those of isolation by distance and colonization history: The case of two white pines
title_fullStr The challenge of separating signatures of local adaptation from those of isolation by distance and colonization history: The case of two white pines
title_full_unstemmed The challenge of separating signatures of local adaptation from those of isolation by distance and colonization history: The case of two white pines
title_short The challenge of separating signatures of local adaptation from those of isolation by distance and colonization history: The case of two white pines
title_sort challenge of separating signatures of local adaptation from those of isolation by distance and colonization history: the case of two white pines
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5192886/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28035257
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2550
work_keys_str_mv AT nadeausimon thechallengeofseparatingsignaturesoflocaladaptationfromthoseofisolationbydistanceandcolonizationhistorythecaseoftwowhitepines
AT meirmanspatrickg thechallengeofseparatingsignaturesoflocaladaptationfromthoseofisolationbydistanceandcolonizationhistorythecaseoftwowhitepines
AT aitkensallyn thechallengeofseparatingsignaturesoflocaladaptationfromthoseofisolationbydistanceandcolonizationhistorythecaseoftwowhitepines
AT ritlandkermit thechallengeofseparatingsignaturesoflocaladaptationfromthoseofisolationbydistanceandcolonizationhistorythecaseoftwowhitepines
AT isabelnathalie thechallengeofseparatingsignaturesoflocaladaptationfromthoseofisolationbydistanceandcolonizationhistorythecaseoftwowhitepines
AT nadeausimon challengeofseparatingsignaturesoflocaladaptationfromthoseofisolationbydistanceandcolonizationhistorythecaseoftwowhitepines
AT meirmanspatrickg challengeofseparatingsignaturesoflocaladaptationfromthoseofisolationbydistanceandcolonizationhistorythecaseoftwowhitepines
AT aitkensallyn challengeofseparatingsignaturesoflocaladaptationfromthoseofisolationbydistanceandcolonizationhistorythecaseoftwowhitepines
AT ritlandkermit challengeofseparatingsignaturesoflocaladaptationfromthoseofisolationbydistanceandcolonizationhistorythecaseoftwowhitepines
AT isabelnathalie challengeofseparatingsignaturesoflocaladaptationfromthoseofisolationbydistanceandcolonizationhistorythecaseoftwowhitepines