Cargando…
The challenge of separating signatures of local adaptation from those of isolation by distance and colonization history: The case of two white pines
Accurately detecting signatures of local adaptation using genetic‐environment associations (GEAs) requires controlling for neutral patterns of population structure to reduce the risk of false positives. However, a high degree of collinearity between climatic gradients and neutral population structur...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5192886/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28035257 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2550 |
_version_ | 1782487864381014016 |
---|---|
author | Nadeau, Simon Meirmans, Patrick G. Aitken, Sally N. Ritland, Kermit Isabel, Nathalie |
author_facet | Nadeau, Simon Meirmans, Patrick G. Aitken, Sally N. Ritland, Kermit Isabel, Nathalie |
author_sort | Nadeau, Simon |
collection | PubMed |
description | Accurately detecting signatures of local adaptation using genetic‐environment associations (GEAs) requires controlling for neutral patterns of population structure to reduce the risk of false positives. However, a high degree of collinearity between climatic gradients and neutral population structure can greatly reduce power, and the performance of GEA methods in such case is rarely evaluated in empirical studies. In this study, we attempted to disentangle the effects of local adaptation and isolation by environment (IBE) from those of isolation by distance (IBD) and isolation by colonization from glacial refugia (IBC) using range‐wide samples in two white pine species. For this, SNPs from 168 genes, including 52 candidate genes for growth and phenology, were genotyped in 133 and 61 populations of Pinus strobus and P. monticola, respectively. For P. strobus and using all 153 SNPs, climate (IBE) did not significantly explained among‐population variation when controlling for IBD and IBC in redundancy analyses (RDAs). However, 26 SNPs were significantly associated with climate in single‐locus GEA analyses (Bayenv2 and LFMM), suggesting that local adaptation took place in the presence of high gene flow. For P. monticola, we found no evidence of IBE using RDAs and weaker signatures of local adaptation using GEA and F (ST) outlier tests, consistent with adaptation via phenotypic plasticity. In both species, the majority of the explained among‐population variation (69 to 96%) could not be partitioned between the effects of IBE, IBD, and IBC. GEA methods can account differently for this confounded variation, and this could explain the small overlap of SNPs detected between Bayenv2 and LFMM. Our study illustrates the inherent difficulty of taking into account neutral structure in natural populations and the importance of sampling designs that maximize climatic variation, while minimizing collinearity between climatic gradients and neutral structure. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5192886 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51928862016-12-29 The challenge of separating signatures of local adaptation from those of isolation by distance and colonization history: The case of two white pines Nadeau, Simon Meirmans, Patrick G. Aitken, Sally N. Ritland, Kermit Isabel, Nathalie Ecol Evol Original Research Accurately detecting signatures of local adaptation using genetic‐environment associations (GEAs) requires controlling for neutral patterns of population structure to reduce the risk of false positives. However, a high degree of collinearity between climatic gradients and neutral population structure can greatly reduce power, and the performance of GEA methods in such case is rarely evaluated in empirical studies. In this study, we attempted to disentangle the effects of local adaptation and isolation by environment (IBE) from those of isolation by distance (IBD) and isolation by colonization from glacial refugia (IBC) using range‐wide samples in two white pine species. For this, SNPs from 168 genes, including 52 candidate genes for growth and phenology, were genotyped in 133 and 61 populations of Pinus strobus and P. monticola, respectively. For P. strobus and using all 153 SNPs, climate (IBE) did not significantly explained among‐population variation when controlling for IBD and IBC in redundancy analyses (RDAs). However, 26 SNPs were significantly associated with climate in single‐locus GEA analyses (Bayenv2 and LFMM), suggesting that local adaptation took place in the presence of high gene flow. For P. monticola, we found no evidence of IBE using RDAs and weaker signatures of local adaptation using GEA and F (ST) outlier tests, consistent with adaptation via phenotypic plasticity. In both species, the majority of the explained among‐population variation (69 to 96%) could not be partitioned between the effects of IBE, IBD, and IBC. GEA methods can account differently for this confounded variation, and this could explain the small overlap of SNPs detected between Bayenv2 and LFMM. Our study illustrates the inherent difficulty of taking into account neutral structure in natural populations and the importance of sampling designs that maximize climatic variation, while minimizing collinearity between climatic gradients and neutral structure. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5192886/ /pubmed/28035257 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2550 Text en © 2016 Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Nadeau, Simon Meirmans, Patrick G. Aitken, Sally N. Ritland, Kermit Isabel, Nathalie The challenge of separating signatures of local adaptation from those of isolation by distance and colonization history: The case of two white pines |
title | The challenge of separating signatures of local adaptation from those of isolation by distance and colonization history: The case of two white pines |
title_full | The challenge of separating signatures of local adaptation from those of isolation by distance and colonization history: The case of two white pines |
title_fullStr | The challenge of separating signatures of local adaptation from those of isolation by distance and colonization history: The case of two white pines |
title_full_unstemmed | The challenge of separating signatures of local adaptation from those of isolation by distance and colonization history: The case of two white pines |
title_short | The challenge of separating signatures of local adaptation from those of isolation by distance and colonization history: The case of two white pines |
title_sort | challenge of separating signatures of local adaptation from those of isolation by distance and colonization history: the case of two white pines |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5192886/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28035257 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2550 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nadeausimon thechallengeofseparatingsignaturesoflocaladaptationfromthoseofisolationbydistanceandcolonizationhistorythecaseoftwowhitepines AT meirmanspatrickg thechallengeofseparatingsignaturesoflocaladaptationfromthoseofisolationbydistanceandcolonizationhistorythecaseoftwowhitepines AT aitkensallyn thechallengeofseparatingsignaturesoflocaladaptationfromthoseofisolationbydistanceandcolonizationhistorythecaseoftwowhitepines AT ritlandkermit thechallengeofseparatingsignaturesoflocaladaptationfromthoseofisolationbydistanceandcolonizationhistorythecaseoftwowhitepines AT isabelnathalie thechallengeofseparatingsignaturesoflocaladaptationfromthoseofisolationbydistanceandcolonizationhistorythecaseoftwowhitepines AT nadeausimon challengeofseparatingsignaturesoflocaladaptationfromthoseofisolationbydistanceandcolonizationhistorythecaseoftwowhitepines AT meirmanspatrickg challengeofseparatingsignaturesoflocaladaptationfromthoseofisolationbydistanceandcolonizationhistorythecaseoftwowhitepines AT aitkensallyn challengeofseparatingsignaturesoflocaladaptationfromthoseofisolationbydistanceandcolonizationhistorythecaseoftwowhitepines AT ritlandkermit challengeofseparatingsignaturesoflocaladaptationfromthoseofisolationbydistanceandcolonizationhistorythecaseoftwowhitepines AT isabelnathalie challengeofseparatingsignaturesoflocaladaptationfromthoseofisolationbydistanceandcolonizationhistorythecaseoftwowhitepines |