Cargando…

Malnutrition: laboratory markers vs nutritional assessment

Malnutrition is an independent risk factor for patient morbidity and mortality and is associated with increased healthcare-related costs. However, a major dilemma exists due to lack of a unified definition for the term. Furthermore, there are no standard methods for screening and diagnosing patients...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bharadwaj, Shishira, Ginoya, Shaiva, Tandon, Parul, Gohel, Tushar D., Guirguis, John, Vallabh, Hiren, Jevenn, Andrea, Hanouneh, Ibrahim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5193064/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27174435
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gastro/gow013
_version_ 1782487896895258624
author Bharadwaj, Shishira
Ginoya, Shaiva
Tandon, Parul
Gohel, Tushar D.
Guirguis, John
Vallabh, Hiren
Jevenn, Andrea
Hanouneh, Ibrahim
author_facet Bharadwaj, Shishira
Ginoya, Shaiva
Tandon, Parul
Gohel, Tushar D.
Guirguis, John
Vallabh, Hiren
Jevenn, Andrea
Hanouneh, Ibrahim
author_sort Bharadwaj, Shishira
collection PubMed
description Malnutrition is an independent risk factor for patient morbidity and mortality and is associated with increased healthcare-related costs. However, a major dilemma exists due to lack of a unified definition for the term. Furthermore, there are no standard methods for screening and diagnosing patients with malnutrition, leading to confusion and varying practices among physicians across the world. The role of inflammation as a risk factor for malnutrition has also been recently recognized. Historically, serum proteins such as albumin and prealbumin (PAB) have been widely used by physicians to determine patient nutritional status. However, recent focus has been on an appropriate nutrition-focused physical examination (NFPE) for diagnosing malnutrition. The current consensus is that laboratory markers are not reliable by themselves but could be used as a complement to a thorough physical examination. Future studies are needed to identify serum biomarkers in order to diagnose malnutrition unaffected by inflammatory states and have the advantage of being noninvasive and relatively cost-effective. However, a thorough NFPE has an unprecedented role in diagnosing malnutrition.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5193064
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51930642017-01-04 Malnutrition: laboratory markers vs nutritional assessment Bharadwaj, Shishira Ginoya, Shaiva Tandon, Parul Gohel, Tushar D. Guirguis, John Vallabh, Hiren Jevenn, Andrea Hanouneh, Ibrahim Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) Review Articles Malnutrition is an independent risk factor for patient morbidity and mortality and is associated with increased healthcare-related costs. However, a major dilemma exists due to lack of a unified definition for the term. Furthermore, there are no standard methods for screening and diagnosing patients with malnutrition, leading to confusion and varying practices among physicians across the world. The role of inflammation as a risk factor for malnutrition has also been recently recognized. Historically, serum proteins such as albumin and prealbumin (PAB) have been widely used by physicians to determine patient nutritional status. However, recent focus has been on an appropriate nutrition-focused physical examination (NFPE) for diagnosing malnutrition. The current consensus is that laboratory markers are not reliable by themselves but could be used as a complement to a thorough physical examination. Future studies are needed to identify serum biomarkers in order to diagnose malnutrition unaffected by inflammatory states and have the advantage of being noninvasive and relatively cost-effective. However, a thorough NFPE has an unprecedented role in diagnosing malnutrition. Oxford University Press 2016-11 2016-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5193064/ /pubmed/27174435 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gastro/gow013 Text en © The Author(s) 2016. Published by Oxford University Press and the Digestive Science Publishing Co. Limited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Articles
Bharadwaj, Shishira
Ginoya, Shaiva
Tandon, Parul
Gohel, Tushar D.
Guirguis, John
Vallabh, Hiren
Jevenn, Andrea
Hanouneh, Ibrahim
Malnutrition: laboratory markers vs nutritional assessment
title Malnutrition: laboratory markers vs nutritional assessment
title_full Malnutrition: laboratory markers vs nutritional assessment
title_fullStr Malnutrition: laboratory markers vs nutritional assessment
title_full_unstemmed Malnutrition: laboratory markers vs nutritional assessment
title_short Malnutrition: laboratory markers vs nutritional assessment
title_sort malnutrition: laboratory markers vs nutritional assessment
topic Review Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5193064/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27174435
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gastro/gow013
work_keys_str_mv AT bharadwajshishira malnutritionlaboratorymarkersvsnutritionalassessment
AT ginoyashaiva malnutritionlaboratorymarkersvsnutritionalassessment
AT tandonparul malnutritionlaboratorymarkersvsnutritionalassessment
AT goheltushard malnutritionlaboratorymarkersvsnutritionalassessment
AT guirguisjohn malnutritionlaboratorymarkersvsnutritionalassessment
AT vallabhhiren malnutritionlaboratorymarkersvsnutritionalassessment
AT jevennandrea malnutritionlaboratorymarkersvsnutritionalassessment
AT hanounehibrahim malnutritionlaboratorymarkersvsnutritionalassessment