Cargando…

Seeking Clearer Recommendations for Hand Hygiene in Communities Facing Ebola: A Randomized Trial Investigating the Impact of Six Handwashing Methods on Skin Irritation and Dermatitis

To prevent disease transmission, 0.05% chlorine solution is commonly recommended for handwashing in Ebola Treatment Units. In the 2014 West Africa outbreak this recommendation was widely extended to community settings, although many organizations recommend soap and hand sanitizer over chlorine. To e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wolfe, Marlene K., Wells, Emma, Mitro, Brittany, Desmarais, Anne Marie, Scheinman, Pamela, Lantagne, Daniele
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5193384/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28030544
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0167378
_version_ 1782487939977052160
author Wolfe, Marlene K.
Wells, Emma
Mitro, Brittany
Desmarais, Anne Marie
Scheinman, Pamela
Lantagne, Daniele
author_facet Wolfe, Marlene K.
Wells, Emma
Mitro, Brittany
Desmarais, Anne Marie
Scheinman, Pamela
Lantagne, Daniele
author_sort Wolfe, Marlene K.
collection PubMed
description To prevent disease transmission, 0.05% chlorine solution is commonly recommended for handwashing in Ebola Treatment Units. In the 2014 West Africa outbreak this recommendation was widely extended to community settings, although many organizations recommend soap and hand sanitizer over chlorine. To evaluate skin irritation caused by frequent handwashing that may increase transmission risk in Ebola-affected communities, we conducted a randomized trial with 91 subjects who washed their hands 10 times a day for 28 days. Subjects used soap and water, sanitizer, or one of four chlorine solutions used by Ebola responders (calcium hypochlorite (HTH), sodium dichloroisocyanurate (NaDCC), and generated or pH-stabilized sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl)). Outcomes were self-reported hand feel, irritation as measured by the Hand Eczema Score Index (HECSI) (range 0–360), signs of transmission risk (e.g., cracking), and dermatitis diagnosis. All groups experienced statistically significant increases in HECSI score. Subjects using sanitizer had the smallest increases, followed by higher pH chlorine solutions (HTH and stabilized NaOCl), and soap and water. The greatest increases were among neutral pH chlorine solutions (NaDCC and generated NaOCl). Signs of irritation related to higher transmission risk were observed most frequently in subjects using soap and least frequently by those using sanitizer or HTH. Despite these irritation increases, all methods represented minor changes in HECSI score. Average HECSI score was only 9.10 at endline (range 1–33) and 4% (4/91) of subjects were diagnosed with dermatitis, one each in four groups. Each handwashing method has benefits and drawbacks: soap is widely available and inexpensive, but requires water and does not inactivate the virus; sanitizer is easy-to use and effective but expensive and unacceptable to many communities, and chlorine is easy-to-use but difficult to produce properly and distribute. Overall, we recommend Ebola responders and communities use whichever handwashing method(s) are most acceptable, available, and sustainable for community handwashing. Trial Registration: International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Registry ISRCTN89815514
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5193384
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51933842017-01-19 Seeking Clearer Recommendations for Hand Hygiene in Communities Facing Ebola: A Randomized Trial Investigating the Impact of Six Handwashing Methods on Skin Irritation and Dermatitis Wolfe, Marlene K. Wells, Emma Mitro, Brittany Desmarais, Anne Marie Scheinman, Pamela Lantagne, Daniele PLoS One Research Article To prevent disease transmission, 0.05% chlorine solution is commonly recommended for handwashing in Ebola Treatment Units. In the 2014 West Africa outbreak this recommendation was widely extended to community settings, although many organizations recommend soap and hand sanitizer over chlorine. To evaluate skin irritation caused by frequent handwashing that may increase transmission risk in Ebola-affected communities, we conducted a randomized trial with 91 subjects who washed their hands 10 times a day for 28 days. Subjects used soap and water, sanitizer, or one of four chlorine solutions used by Ebola responders (calcium hypochlorite (HTH), sodium dichloroisocyanurate (NaDCC), and generated or pH-stabilized sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl)). Outcomes were self-reported hand feel, irritation as measured by the Hand Eczema Score Index (HECSI) (range 0–360), signs of transmission risk (e.g., cracking), and dermatitis diagnosis. All groups experienced statistically significant increases in HECSI score. Subjects using sanitizer had the smallest increases, followed by higher pH chlorine solutions (HTH and stabilized NaOCl), and soap and water. The greatest increases were among neutral pH chlorine solutions (NaDCC and generated NaOCl). Signs of irritation related to higher transmission risk were observed most frequently in subjects using soap and least frequently by those using sanitizer or HTH. Despite these irritation increases, all methods represented minor changes in HECSI score. Average HECSI score was only 9.10 at endline (range 1–33) and 4% (4/91) of subjects were diagnosed with dermatitis, one each in four groups. Each handwashing method has benefits and drawbacks: soap is widely available and inexpensive, but requires water and does not inactivate the virus; sanitizer is easy-to use and effective but expensive and unacceptable to many communities, and chlorine is easy-to-use but difficult to produce properly and distribute. Overall, we recommend Ebola responders and communities use whichever handwashing method(s) are most acceptable, available, and sustainable for community handwashing. Trial Registration: International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Registry ISRCTN89815514 Public Library of Science 2016-12-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5193384/ /pubmed/28030544 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0167378 Text en © 2016 Wolfe et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wolfe, Marlene K.
Wells, Emma
Mitro, Brittany
Desmarais, Anne Marie
Scheinman, Pamela
Lantagne, Daniele
Seeking Clearer Recommendations for Hand Hygiene in Communities Facing Ebola: A Randomized Trial Investigating the Impact of Six Handwashing Methods on Skin Irritation and Dermatitis
title Seeking Clearer Recommendations for Hand Hygiene in Communities Facing Ebola: A Randomized Trial Investigating the Impact of Six Handwashing Methods on Skin Irritation and Dermatitis
title_full Seeking Clearer Recommendations for Hand Hygiene in Communities Facing Ebola: A Randomized Trial Investigating the Impact of Six Handwashing Methods on Skin Irritation and Dermatitis
title_fullStr Seeking Clearer Recommendations for Hand Hygiene in Communities Facing Ebola: A Randomized Trial Investigating the Impact of Six Handwashing Methods on Skin Irritation and Dermatitis
title_full_unstemmed Seeking Clearer Recommendations for Hand Hygiene in Communities Facing Ebola: A Randomized Trial Investigating the Impact of Six Handwashing Methods on Skin Irritation and Dermatitis
title_short Seeking Clearer Recommendations for Hand Hygiene in Communities Facing Ebola: A Randomized Trial Investigating the Impact of Six Handwashing Methods on Skin Irritation and Dermatitis
title_sort seeking clearer recommendations for hand hygiene in communities facing ebola: a randomized trial investigating the impact of six handwashing methods on skin irritation and dermatitis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5193384/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28030544
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0167378
work_keys_str_mv AT wolfemarlenek seekingclearerrecommendationsforhandhygieneincommunitiesfacingebolaarandomizedtrialinvestigatingtheimpactofsixhandwashingmethodsonskinirritationanddermatitis
AT wellsemma seekingclearerrecommendationsforhandhygieneincommunitiesfacingebolaarandomizedtrialinvestigatingtheimpactofsixhandwashingmethodsonskinirritationanddermatitis
AT mitrobrittany seekingclearerrecommendationsforhandhygieneincommunitiesfacingebolaarandomizedtrialinvestigatingtheimpactofsixhandwashingmethodsonskinirritationanddermatitis
AT desmaraisannemarie seekingclearerrecommendationsforhandhygieneincommunitiesfacingebolaarandomizedtrialinvestigatingtheimpactofsixhandwashingmethodsonskinirritationanddermatitis
AT scheinmanpamela seekingclearerrecommendationsforhandhygieneincommunitiesfacingebolaarandomizedtrialinvestigatingtheimpactofsixhandwashingmethodsonskinirritationanddermatitis
AT lantagnedaniele seekingclearerrecommendationsforhandhygieneincommunitiesfacingebolaarandomizedtrialinvestigatingtheimpactofsixhandwashingmethodsonskinirritationanddermatitis