Cargando…

Sublethal Effects of Imidacloprid on Honey Bee Colony Growth and Activity at Three Sites in the U.S.

Imidacloprid is a neonicotinoid pesticide heavily used by the agricultural industry and shown to have negative impacts on honey bees above certain concentrations. We evaluated the effects of different imidacloprid concentrations in sugar syrup using cage and field studies, and across different envir...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meikle, William G., Adamczyk, John J., Weiss, Milagra, Gregorc, Ales, Johnson, Don R., Stewart, Scott D., Zawislak, Jon, Carroll, Mark J., Lorenz, Gus M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5193417/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28030617
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168603
_version_ 1782487946023141376
author Meikle, William G.
Adamczyk, John J.
Weiss, Milagra
Gregorc, Ales
Johnson, Don R.
Stewart, Scott D.
Zawislak, Jon
Carroll, Mark J.
Lorenz, Gus M.
author_facet Meikle, William G.
Adamczyk, John J.
Weiss, Milagra
Gregorc, Ales
Johnson, Don R.
Stewart, Scott D.
Zawislak, Jon
Carroll, Mark J.
Lorenz, Gus M.
author_sort Meikle, William G.
collection PubMed
description Imidacloprid is a neonicotinoid pesticide heavily used by the agricultural industry and shown to have negative impacts on honey bees above certain concentrations. We evaluated the effects of different imidacloprid concentrations in sugar syrup using cage and field studies, and across different environments. Honey bee colonies fed sublethal concentrations of imidicloprid (0, 5, 20 and 100 ppb) over 6 weeks in field trials at a desert site (Arizona), a site near intensive agriculture (Arkansas) and a site with little nearby agriculture but abundant natural forage (Mississippi) were monitored with respect to colony metrics, such as adult bee and brood population sizes, as well as pesticide residues. Hive weight and internal hive temperature were monitored continuously over two trials in Arizona. Colonies fed 100 ppb imidacloprid in Arizona had significantly lower adult bee populations, brood surface areas and average frame weights, and reduced temperature control, compared to colonies in one or more of the other treatment groups, and consumption rates of those colonies were lower compared to other colonies in Arizona and Arkansas, although no differences in capped brood or average frame weight were observed among treatments in Arkansas. At the Mississippi site, also rich in alternative forage, colonies fed 5 ppb imidacloprid had less capped brood than control colonies, but contamination of control colonies was detected. In contrast, significantly higher daily hive weight variability among colonies fed 5 ppb imidacloprid in Arizona suggested greater foraging activity during a nectar flow post treatment, than any other treatment group. Imidacloprid concentrations in stored honey corresponded well with the respective syrup concentrations fed to the colonies and remained stable within the hive for at least 7 months after the end of treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5193417
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51934172017-01-19 Sublethal Effects of Imidacloprid on Honey Bee Colony Growth and Activity at Three Sites in the U.S. Meikle, William G. Adamczyk, John J. Weiss, Milagra Gregorc, Ales Johnson, Don R. Stewart, Scott D. Zawislak, Jon Carroll, Mark J. Lorenz, Gus M. PLoS One Research Article Imidacloprid is a neonicotinoid pesticide heavily used by the agricultural industry and shown to have negative impacts on honey bees above certain concentrations. We evaluated the effects of different imidacloprid concentrations in sugar syrup using cage and field studies, and across different environments. Honey bee colonies fed sublethal concentrations of imidicloprid (0, 5, 20 and 100 ppb) over 6 weeks in field trials at a desert site (Arizona), a site near intensive agriculture (Arkansas) and a site with little nearby agriculture but abundant natural forage (Mississippi) were monitored with respect to colony metrics, such as adult bee and brood population sizes, as well as pesticide residues. Hive weight and internal hive temperature were monitored continuously over two trials in Arizona. Colonies fed 100 ppb imidacloprid in Arizona had significantly lower adult bee populations, brood surface areas and average frame weights, and reduced temperature control, compared to colonies in one or more of the other treatment groups, and consumption rates of those colonies were lower compared to other colonies in Arizona and Arkansas, although no differences in capped brood or average frame weight were observed among treatments in Arkansas. At the Mississippi site, also rich in alternative forage, colonies fed 5 ppb imidacloprid had less capped brood than control colonies, but contamination of control colonies was detected. In contrast, significantly higher daily hive weight variability among colonies fed 5 ppb imidacloprid in Arizona suggested greater foraging activity during a nectar flow post treatment, than any other treatment group. Imidacloprid concentrations in stored honey corresponded well with the respective syrup concentrations fed to the colonies and remained stable within the hive for at least 7 months after the end of treatment. Public Library of Science 2016-12-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5193417/ /pubmed/28030617 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168603 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) public domain dedication.
spellingShingle Research Article
Meikle, William G.
Adamczyk, John J.
Weiss, Milagra
Gregorc, Ales
Johnson, Don R.
Stewart, Scott D.
Zawislak, Jon
Carroll, Mark J.
Lorenz, Gus M.
Sublethal Effects of Imidacloprid on Honey Bee Colony Growth and Activity at Three Sites in the U.S.
title Sublethal Effects of Imidacloprid on Honey Bee Colony Growth and Activity at Three Sites in the U.S.
title_full Sublethal Effects of Imidacloprid on Honey Bee Colony Growth and Activity at Three Sites in the U.S.
title_fullStr Sublethal Effects of Imidacloprid on Honey Bee Colony Growth and Activity at Three Sites in the U.S.
title_full_unstemmed Sublethal Effects of Imidacloprid on Honey Bee Colony Growth and Activity at Three Sites in the U.S.
title_short Sublethal Effects of Imidacloprid on Honey Bee Colony Growth and Activity at Three Sites in the U.S.
title_sort sublethal effects of imidacloprid on honey bee colony growth and activity at three sites in the u.s.
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5193417/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28030617
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168603
work_keys_str_mv AT meiklewilliamg sublethaleffectsofimidaclopridonhoneybeecolonygrowthandactivityatthreesitesintheus
AT adamczykjohnj sublethaleffectsofimidaclopridonhoneybeecolonygrowthandactivityatthreesitesintheus
AT weissmilagra sublethaleffectsofimidaclopridonhoneybeecolonygrowthandactivityatthreesitesintheus
AT gregorcales sublethaleffectsofimidaclopridonhoneybeecolonygrowthandactivityatthreesitesintheus
AT johnsondonr sublethaleffectsofimidaclopridonhoneybeecolonygrowthandactivityatthreesitesintheus
AT stewartscottd sublethaleffectsofimidaclopridonhoneybeecolonygrowthandactivityatthreesitesintheus
AT zawislakjon sublethaleffectsofimidaclopridonhoneybeecolonygrowthandactivityatthreesitesintheus
AT carrollmarkj sublethaleffectsofimidaclopridonhoneybeecolonygrowthandactivityatthreesitesintheus
AT lorenzgusm sublethaleffectsofimidaclopridonhoneybeecolonygrowthandactivityatthreesitesintheus