Cargando…
Fair Processes for Priority Setting: Putting Theory into Practice : Comment on "Expanded HTA: Enhancing Fairness and Legitimacy"
Embedding health technology assessment (HTA) in a fair process has great potential to capture societal values relevant to public reimbursement decisions on health technologies. However, the development of such processes for priority setting has largely been theoretical. In this paper, we provide fur...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Kerman University of Medical Sciences
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5193505/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28005541 http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2016.85 |
_version_ | 1782487958946840576 |
---|---|
author | Jansen, Maarten P. Helderman, Jan-Kees Boer, Bert Baltussen, Rob |
author_facet | Jansen, Maarten P. Helderman, Jan-Kees Boer, Bert Baltussen, Rob |
author_sort | Jansen, Maarten P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Embedding health technology assessment (HTA) in a fair process has great potential to capture societal values relevant to public reimbursement decisions on health technologies. However, the development of such processes for priority setting has largely been theoretical. In this paper, we provide further practical lead ways on how these processes can be implemented. We first present the misconception about the relation between facts and values that is since long misleading the conduct of HTA and underlies the current assessment-appraisal split. We then argue that HTA should instead be explicitly organized as an ongoing evidence-informed deliberative process, that facilitates learning among stakeholders. This has important consequences for whose values to consider, how to deal with vested interests, how to consider all values in the decision-making process, and how to communicate decisions. This is in stark contrast to how HTA processes are implemented now. It is time to set the stage for HTA as learning. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5193505 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Kerman University of Medical Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51935052016-12-29 Fair Processes for Priority Setting: Putting Theory into Practice : Comment on "Expanded HTA: Enhancing Fairness and Legitimacy" Jansen, Maarten P. Helderman, Jan-Kees Boer, Bert Baltussen, Rob Int J Health Policy Manag Commentary Embedding health technology assessment (HTA) in a fair process has great potential to capture societal values relevant to public reimbursement decisions on health technologies. However, the development of such processes for priority setting has largely been theoretical. In this paper, we provide further practical lead ways on how these processes can be implemented. We first present the misconception about the relation between facts and values that is since long misleading the conduct of HTA and underlies the current assessment-appraisal split. We then argue that HTA should instead be explicitly organized as an ongoing evidence-informed deliberative process, that facilitates learning among stakeholders. This has important consequences for whose values to consider, how to deal with vested interests, how to consider all values in the decision-making process, and how to communicate decisions. This is in stark contrast to how HTA processes are implemented now. It is time to set the stage for HTA as learning. Kerman University of Medical Sciences 2016-07-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5193505/ /pubmed/28005541 http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2016.85 Text en © 2017 The Author(s); Published by Kerman University of Medical Sciences This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Commentary Jansen, Maarten P. Helderman, Jan-Kees Boer, Bert Baltussen, Rob Fair Processes for Priority Setting: Putting Theory into Practice : Comment on "Expanded HTA: Enhancing Fairness and Legitimacy" |
title |
Fair Processes for Priority Setting: Putting Theory into Practice
: Comment on "Expanded HTA: Enhancing Fairness and Legitimacy" |
title_full |
Fair Processes for Priority Setting: Putting Theory into Practice
: Comment on "Expanded HTA: Enhancing Fairness and Legitimacy" |
title_fullStr |
Fair Processes for Priority Setting: Putting Theory into Practice
: Comment on "Expanded HTA: Enhancing Fairness and Legitimacy" |
title_full_unstemmed |
Fair Processes for Priority Setting: Putting Theory into Practice
: Comment on "Expanded HTA: Enhancing Fairness and Legitimacy" |
title_short |
Fair Processes for Priority Setting: Putting Theory into Practice
: Comment on "Expanded HTA: Enhancing Fairness and Legitimacy" |
title_sort | fair processes for priority setting: putting theory into practice
: comment on "expanded hta: enhancing fairness and legitimacy" |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5193505/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28005541 http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2016.85 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jansenmaartenp fairprocessesforprioritysettingputtingtheoryintopracticecommentonexpandedhtaenhancingfairnessandlegitimacy AT heldermanjankees fairprocessesforprioritysettingputtingtheoryintopracticecommentonexpandedhtaenhancingfairnessandlegitimacy AT boerbert fairprocessesforprioritysettingputtingtheoryintopracticecommentonexpandedhtaenhancingfairnessandlegitimacy AT baltussenrob fairprocessesforprioritysettingputtingtheoryintopracticecommentonexpandedhtaenhancingfairnessandlegitimacy |