Cargando…
Switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) Intercropping within Managed Loblolly Pine (Pinus taeda) Does Not Affect Wild Bee Communities
Intensively-managed pine (Pinus spp.) have been shown to support diverse vertebrate communities, but their ability to support invertebrate communities, such as wild bees, has not been well-studied. Recently, researchers have examined intercropping switchgrass (Panicum virgatum), a native perennial,...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5198210/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27827916 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/insects7040062 |
_version_ | 1782488848851271680 |
---|---|
author | Campbell, Joshua W. Miller, Darren A. Martin, James A. |
author_facet | Campbell, Joshua W. Miller, Darren A. Martin, James A. |
author_sort | Campbell, Joshua W. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Intensively-managed pine (Pinus spp.) have been shown to support diverse vertebrate communities, but their ability to support invertebrate communities, such as wild bees, has not been well-studied. Recently, researchers have examined intercropping switchgrass (Panicum virgatum), a native perennial, within intensively managed loblolly pine (P. taeda) plantations as a potential source for cellulosic biofuels. To better understand potential effects of intercropping on bee communities, we investigated visitation of bees within three replicates of four treatments of loblolly pine in Mississippi, U.S.A.: 3–4 year old pine plantations and 9–10 year old pine plantations with and without intercropped switchgrass. We used colored pan traps to capture bees during the growing seasons of 2013 and 2014. We captured 2507 bees comprised of 18 different genera during the two-year study, with Lasioglossum and Ceratina being the most common genera captured. Overall, bee abundances were dependent on plantation age and not presence of intercropping. Our data suggests that switchgrass does not negatively impact or promote bee communities within intensively-managed loblolly pine plantations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5198210 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51982102017-01-04 Switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) Intercropping within Managed Loblolly Pine (Pinus taeda) Does Not Affect Wild Bee Communities Campbell, Joshua W. Miller, Darren A. Martin, James A. Insects Article Intensively-managed pine (Pinus spp.) have been shown to support diverse vertebrate communities, but their ability to support invertebrate communities, such as wild bees, has not been well-studied. Recently, researchers have examined intercropping switchgrass (Panicum virgatum), a native perennial, within intensively managed loblolly pine (P. taeda) plantations as a potential source for cellulosic biofuels. To better understand potential effects of intercropping on bee communities, we investigated visitation of bees within three replicates of four treatments of loblolly pine in Mississippi, U.S.A.: 3–4 year old pine plantations and 9–10 year old pine plantations with and without intercropped switchgrass. We used colored pan traps to capture bees during the growing seasons of 2013 and 2014. We captured 2507 bees comprised of 18 different genera during the two-year study, with Lasioglossum and Ceratina being the most common genera captured. Overall, bee abundances were dependent on plantation age and not presence of intercropping. Our data suggests that switchgrass does not negatively impact or promote bee communities within intensively-managed loblolly pine plantations. MDPI 2016-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5198210/ /pubmed/27827916 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/insects7040062 Text en © 2016 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Campbell, Joshua W. Miller, Darren A. Martin, James A. Switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) Intercropping within Managed Loblolly Pine (Pinus taeda) Does Not Affect Wild Bee Communities |
title | Switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) Intercropping within Managed Loblolly Pine (Pinus taeda) Does Not Affect Wild Bee Communities |
title_full | Switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) Intercropping within Managed Loblolly Pine (Pinus taeda) Does Not Affect Wild Bee Communities |
title_fullStr | Switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) Intercropping within Managed Loblolly Pine (Pinus taeda) Does Not Affect Wild Bee Communities |
title_full_unstemmed | Switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) Intercropping within Managed Loblolly Pine (Pinus taeda) Does Not Affect Wild Bee Communities |
title_short | Switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) Intercropping within Managed Loblolly Pine (Pinus taeda) Does Not Affect Wild Bee Communities |
title_sort | switchgrass (panicum virgatum) intercropping within managed loblolly pine (pinus taeda) does not affect wild bee communities |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5198210/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27827916 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/insects7040062 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT campbelljoshuaw switchgrasspanicumvirgatumintercroppingwithinmanagedloblollypinepinustaedadoesnotaffectwildbeecommunities AT millerdarrena switchgrasspanicumvirgatumintercroppingwithinmanagedloblollypinepinustaedadoesnotaffectwildbeecommunities AT martinjamesa switchgrasspanicumvirgatumintercroppingwithinmanagedloblollypinepinustaedadoesnotaffectwildbeecommunities |