Cargando…

Novel implications in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma

Worldwide hepatocellular carcinoma remains one of the leading causes of cancer-related death, associated with a poor prognosis due to late diagnosis in the majority of cases. Physicians at care are frequently confronted with patients who are ineligible for curative treatment such as liver resection,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Best, Jan, Schotten, Clemens, Theysohn, Jens M., Wetter, Axel, Müller, Stefan, Radünz, Sonia, Schulze, Maren, Canbay, Ali, Dechêne, Alexander, Gerken, Guido
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hellenic Society of Gastroenterology 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5198244/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28042235
http://dx.doi.org/10.20524/aog.2016.0092
_version_ 1782488855772921856
author Best, Jan
Schotten, Clemens
Theysohn, Jens M.
Wetter, Axel
Müller, Stefan
Radünz, Sonia
Schulze, Maren
Canbay, Ali
Dechêne, Alexander
Gerken, Guido
author_facet Best, Jan
Schotten, Clemens
Theysohn, Jens M.
Wetter, Axel
Müller, Stefan
Radünz, Sonia
Schulze, Maren
Canbay, Ali
Dechêne, Alexander
Gerken, Guido
author_sort Best, Jan
collection PubMed
description Worldwide hepatocellular carcinoma remains one of the leading causes of cancer-related death, associated with a poor prognosis due to late diagnosis in the majority of cases. Physicians at care are frequently confronted with patients who are ineligible for curative treatment such as liver resection, transplantation or radiofrequency ablation. Besides established palliative locoregional therapies, such as ablation or chemoembolization, new treatment options, such as microwave ablation, drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization or selective internal radiation therapy, are emerging; however, data from randomized controlled trials are still lacking. In order to achieve optimal tumor control, patients should receive tailored treatment concepts, considering their tumor burden, liver function and performance status, instead of strictly assigning patients to treatment modalities following algorithms that may be partly very restrictive. Palliative locoregional pretreatment might facilitate downstaging to ensure later curative resection or transplantation. In addition, the combined utilization of different locoregional treatment options or systemic co-treatment has been the subject of several trials. In cases where local tumor control cannot be achieved, or in the scenario of extrahepatic spread, sorafenib remains the only approved systemic therapy option. Alternative targeted therapies, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors have shown encouraging preliminary results, while data from phase III studies are pending.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5198244
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Hellenic Society of Gastroenterology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51982442017-01-01 Novel implications in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma Best, Jan Schotten, Clemens Theysohn, Jens M. Wetter, Axel Müller, Stefan Radünz, Sonia Schulze, Maren Canbay, Ali Dechêne, Alexander Gerken, Guido Ann Gastroenterol Invited Review Worldwide hepatocellular carcinoma remains one of the leading causes of cancer-related death, associated with a poor prognosis due to late diagnosis in the majority of cases. Physicians at care are frequently confronted with patients who are ineligible for curative treatment such as liver resection, transplantation or radiofrequency ablation. Besides established palliative locoregional therapies, such as ablation or chemoembolization, new treatment options, such as microwave ablation, drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization or selective internal radiation therapy, are emerging; however, data from randomized controlled trials are still lacking. In order to achieve optimal tumor control, patients should receive tailored treatment concepts, considering their tumor burden, liver function and performance status, instead of strictly assigning patients to treatment modalities following algorithms that may be partly very restrictive. Palliative locoregional pretreatment might facilitate downstaging to ensure later curative resection or transplantation. In addition, the combined utilization of different locoregional treatment options or systemic co-treatment has been the subject of several trials. In cases where local tumor control cannot be achieved, or in the scenario of extrahepatic spread, sorafenib remains the only approved systemic therapy option. Alternative targeted therapies, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors have shown encouraging preliminary results, while data from phase III studies are pending. Hellenic Society of Gastroenterology 2017 2016-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5198244/ /pubmed/28042235 http://dx.doi.org/10.20524/aog.2016.0092 Text en Copyright: © Hellenic Society of Gastroenterology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Invited Review
Best, Jan
Schotten, Clemens
Theysohn, Jens M.
Wetter, Axel
Müller, Stefan
Radünz, Sonia
Schulze, Maren
Canbay, Ali
Dechêne, Alexander
Gerken, Guido
Novel implications in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma
title Novel implications in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma
title_full Novel implications in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma
title_fullStr Novel implications in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Novel implications in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma
title_short Novel implications in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma
title_sort novel implications in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma
topic Invited Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5198244/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28042235
http://dx.doi.org/10.20524/aog.2016.0092
work_keys_str_mv AT bestjan novelimplicationsinthetreatmentofhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT schottenclemens novelimplicationsinthetreatmentofhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT theysohnjensm novelimplicationsinthetreatmentofhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT wetteraxel novelimplicationsinthetreatmentofhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT mullerstefan novelimplicationsinthetreatmentofhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT radunzsonia novelimplicationsinthetreatmentofhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT schulzemaren novelimplicationsinthetreatmentofhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT canbayali novelimplicationsinthetreatmentofhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT dechenealexander novelimplicationsinthetreatmentofhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT gerkenguido novelimplicationsinthetreatmentofhepatocellularcarcinoma