Cargando…

A Review of 10 Years of Vasectomy Programming and Research in Low-Resource Settings

Vasectomy is a highly effective and safe contraceptive method for couples who want to stop childbearing, but only 2.4% of men around the world use this method. We conducted an extensive review of the vasectomy research literature and programmatic reports, published between April 2005 and April 2015,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shattuck, Dominick, Perry, Brian, Packer, Catherine, Chin Quee, Dawn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Global Health: Science and Practice 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5199180/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28031302
http://dx.doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-16-00235
_version_ 1782488962052390912
author Shattuck, Dominick
Perry, Brian
Packer, Catherine
Chin Quee, Dawn
author_facet Shattuck, Dominick
Perry, Brian
Packer, Catherine
Chin Quee, Dawn
author_sort Shattuck, Dominick
collection PubMed
description Vasectomy is a highly effective and safe contraceptive method for couples who want to stop childbearing, but only 2.4% of men around the world use this method. We conducted an extensive review of the vasectomy research literature and programmatic reports, published between April 2005 and April 2015, to synthesize barriers and facilitators to vasectomy adoption. Of the more than 230 documents initially retrieved in our search, we ultimately included 75 documents in our review and synthesized the findings according to the Supply–Enabling Environment–Demand (SEED) Programming Model. Regarding promoting demand for vasectomy services, we found there was a general lack of awareness about the method among both men and women, which often fueled erroneous assumptions about how vasectomy affects men. Several types of programmatic activities directly addressed knowledge gaps and negative misperceptions, including community-based and mass media communications, employer-based promotion, and group counseling. For supply of services, the lack of or inaccurate knowledge about vasectomy was also prevalent among providers, particularly among community-based health workers. Programmatic activities to improve service delivery included the use of evidence-based vasectomy techniques such as no-scalpel vasectomy, whole-site trainings, task shifting, cascade training, and mobile outreach. Finally, programmatic approaches to building a more enabling environment included engagement of governments and other community and religious leaders as well as campaigns with gender transformative messaging that countered common myths and encouraged men's positive engagement in family planning and reproductive health. In summary, a successful vasectomy program is comprised of the mutually reinforcing components of continual demand for services and access to and supply of well-trained providers. In addition, there is an underlying need for enabling policies within the cultural and gender environments that extend beyond vasectomy and include men not just as default partners of female family planning clients but as equal beneficiaries of family planning and reproductive health programs in their own right. Accelerating progress toward meaningful integration of vasectomy into a comprehensive contraceptive method mix is only possible when political and financial will are aligned and support the logistical and promotional activities of a male reproductive health agenda.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5199180
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Global Health: Science and Practice
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51991802017-01-05 A Review of 10 Years of Vasectomy Programming and Research in Low-Resource Settings Shattuck, Dominick Perry, Brian Packer, Catherine Chin Quee, Dawn Glob Health Sci Pract Review Vasectomy is a highly effective and safe contraceptive method for couples who want to stop childbearing, but only 2.4% of men around the world use this method. We conducted an extensive review of the vasectomy research literature and programmatic reports, published between April 2005 and April 2015, to synthesize barriers and facilitators to vasectomy adoption. Of the more than 230 documents initially retrieved in our search, we ultimately included 75 documents in our review and synthesized the findings according to the Supply–Enabling Environment–Demand (SEED) Programming Model. Regarding promoting demand for vasectomy services, we found there was a general lack of awareness about the method among both men and women, which often fueled erroneous assumptions about how vasectomy affects men. Several types of programmatic activities directly addressed knowledge gaps and negative misperceptions, including community-based and mass media communications, employer-based promotion, and group counseling. For supply of services, the lack of or inaccurate knowledge about vasectomy was also prevalent among providers, particularly among community-based health workers. Programmatic activities to improve service delivery included the use of evidence-based vasectomy techniques such as no-scalpel vasectomy, whole-site trainings, task shifting, cascade training, and mobile outreach. Finally, programmatic approaches to building a more enabling environment included engagement of governments and other community and religious leaders as well as campaigns with gender transformative messaging that countered common myths and encouraged men's positive engagement in family planning and reproductive health. In summary, a successful vasectomy program is comprised of the mutually reinforcing components of continual demand for services and access to and supply of well-trained providers. In addition, there is an underlying need for enabling policies within the cultural and gender environments that extend beyond vasectomy and include men not just as default partners of female family planning clients but as equal beneficiaries of family planning and reproductive health programs in their own right. Accelerating progress toward meaningful integration of vasectomy into a comprehensive contraceptive method mix is only possible when political and financial will are aligned and support the logistical and promotional activities of a male reproductive health agenda. Global Health: Science and Practice 2016-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5199180/ /pubmed/28031302 http://dx.doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-16-00235 Text en © Shattuck et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly cited. To view a copy of the license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/. When linking to this article, please use the following permanent link: http://dx.doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-16-00235
spellingShingle Review
Shattuck, Dominick
Perry, Brian
Packer, Catherine
Chin Quee, Dawn
A Review of 10 Years of Vasectomy Programming and Research in Low-Resource Settings
title A Review of 10 Years of Vasectomy Programming and Research in Low-Resource Settings
title_full A Review of 10 Years of Vasectomy Programming and Research in Low-Resource Settings
title_fullStr A Review of 10 Years of Vasectomy Programming and Research in Low-Resource Settings
title_full_unstemmed A Review of 10 Years of Vasectomy Programming and Research in Low-Resource Settings
title_short A Review of 10 Years of Vasectomy Programming and Research in Low-Resource Settings
title_sort review of 10 years of vasectomy programming and research in low-resource settings
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5199180/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28031302
http://dx.doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-16-00235
work_keys_str_mv AT shattuckdominick areviewof10yearsofvasectomyprogrammingandresearchinlowresourcesettings
AT perrybrian areviewof10yearsofvasectomyprogrammingandresearchinlowresourcesettings
AT packercatherine areviewof10yearsofvasectomyprogrammingandresearchinlowresourcesettings
AT chinqueedawn areviewof10yearsofvasectomyprogrammingandresearchinlowresourcesettings
AT shattuckdominick reviewof10yearsofvasectomyprogrammingandresearchinlowresourcesettings
AT perrybrian reviewof10yearsofvasectomyprogrammingandresearchinlowresourcesettings
AT packercatherine reviewof10yearsofvasectomyprogrammingandresearchinlowresourcesettings
AT chinqueedawn reviewof10yearsofvasectomyprogrammingandresearchinlowresourcesettings