Cargando…

Qualitative Assessment of the Application of a Discrete Choice Experiment With Community Health Workers in Uganda: Aligning Incentives With Preferences

BACKGROUND: Maximizing the benefits of community health worker (CHW) programs requires strategies for improving motivation, performance, and retention. Discrete choice experiments (DCE) are increasingly used to inform policy response to health workforce shortages in rural areas, and may be of value...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brunie, Aurélie, Chen, Mario, Akol, Angela
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Global Health: Science and Practice 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5199183/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28031305
http://dx.doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-16-00070
_version_ 1782488962711945216
author Brunie, Aurélie
Chen, Mario
Akol, Angela
author_facet Brunie, Aurélie
Chen, Mario
Akol, Angela
author_sort Brunie, Aurélie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Maximizing the benefits of community health worker (CHW) programs requires strategies for improving motivation, performance, and retention. Discrete choice experiments (DCE) are increasingly used to inform policy response to health workforce shortages in rural areas, and may be of value in the context of CHW programs. Participants are presented with pairs of hypothetical jobs that are described by job attributes with varying levels and are asked what their preferred job is within each pair. Responses are then analyzed quantitatively to obtain information on what attributes are important to participants. We conducted a qualitative assessment to examine the appropriateness and validity of applying a DCE to a new population of CHWs with lower literacy. METHODS: In 2011, we conducted a mixed-method study with CHWs in Uganda, consisting of 183 surveys and 43 in-depth interviews (IDIs). The DCE was administered to both survey and IDI participants. This article reports on the qualitative assessment of the implementation of the DCE. We compare DCE responses between survey and IDI participants to determine whether administering the DCE in a qualitative (IDI) context altered responses. We then present additional information collected on CHWs' decision-making processes and their experiences with the DCE in the IDIs. RESULTS: Choices made by IDI participants were consistent with the choices made by survey participants. In-depth exploration of CHWs' observations in answering the DCE suggest that, overall, CHWs comprehended the DCE exercise and made reasoned choices. However, the data revealed some level of cognitive difficulty and highlighted some design and implementation challenges that are important to consider, particularly when applying a DCE to populations with lower literacy. These include the need to keep the number of attributes small; to choose levels that are realistic yet show sufficient range; and to clearly define attributes and their levels. CONCLUSION: DCEs can be an appropriate approach with CHWs but require careful design and implementation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5199183
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Global Health: Science and Practice
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51991832017-01-05 Qualitative Assessment of the Application of a Discrete Choice Experiment With Community Health Workers in Uganda: Aligning Incentives With Preferences Brunie, Aurélie Chen, Mario Akol, Angela Glob Health Sci Pract Methodology BACKGROUND: Maximizing the benefits of community health worker (CHW) programs requires strategies for improving motivation, performance, and retention. Discrete choice experiments (DCE) are increasingly used to inform policy response to health workforce shortages in rural areas, and may be of value in the context of CHW programs. Participants are presented with pairs of hypothetical jobs that are described by job attributes with varying levels and are asked what their preferred job is within each pair. Responses are then analyzed quantitatively to obtain information on what attributes are important to participants. We conducted a qualitative assessment to examine the appropriateness and validity of applying a DCE to a new population of CHWs with lower literacy. METHODS: In 2011, we conducted a mixed-method study with CHWs in Uganda, consisting of 183 surveys and 43 in-depth interviews (IDIs). The DCE was administered to both survey and IDI participants. This article reports on the qualitative assessment of the implementation of the DCE. We compare DCE responses between survey and IDI participants to determine whether administering the DCE in a qualitative (IDI) context altered responses. We then present additional information collected on CHWs' decision-making processes and their experiences with the DCE in the IDIs. RESULTS: Choices made by IDI participants were consistent with the choices made by survey participants. In-depth exploration of CHWs' observations in answering the DCE suggest that, overall, CHWs comprehended the DCE exercise and made reasoned choices. However, the data revealed some level of cognitive difficulty and highlighted some design and implementation challenges that are important to consider, particularly when applying a DCE to populations with lower literacy. These include the need to keep the number of attributes small; to choose levels that are realistic yet show sufficient range; and to clearly define attributes and their levels. CONCLUSION: DCEs can be an appropriate approach with CHWs but require careful design and implementation. Global Health: Science and Practice 2016-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5199183/ /pubmed/28031305 http://dx.doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-16-00070 Text en © Brunie et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly cited. To view a copy of the license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/. When linking to this article, please use the following permanent link: http://dx.doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-16-00070
spellingShingle Methodology
Brunie, Aurélie
Chen, Mario
Akol, Angela
Qualitative Assessment of the Application of a Discrete Choice Experiment With Community Health Workers in Uganda: Aligning Incentives With Preferences
title Qualitative Assessment of the Application of a Discrete Choice Experiment With Community Health Workers in Uganda: Aligning Incentives With Preferences
title_full Qualitative Assessment of the Application of a Discrete Choice Experiment With Community Health Workers in Uganda: Aligning Incentives With Preferences
title_fullStr Qualitative Assessment of the Application of a Discrete Choice Experiment With Community Health Workers in Uganda: Aligning Incentives With Preferences
title_full_unstemmed Qualitative Assessment of the Application of a Discrete Choice Experiment With Community Health Workers in Uganda: Aligning Incentives With Preferences
title_short Qualitative Assessment of the Application of a Discrete Choice Experiment With Community Health Workers in Uganda: Aligning Incentives With Preferences
title_sort qualitative assessment of the application of a discrete choice experiment with community health workers in uganda: aligning incentives with preferences
topic Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5199183/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28031305
http://dx.doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-16-00070
work_keys_str_mv AT brunieaurelie qualitativeassessmentoftheapplicationofadiscretechoiceexperimentwithcommunityhealthworkersinugandaaligningincentiveswithpreferences
AT chenmario qualitativeassessmentoftheapplicationofadiscretechoiceexperimentwithcommunityhealthworkersinugandaaligningincentiveswithpreferences
AT akolangela qualitativeassessmentoftheapplicationofadiscretechoiceexperimentwithcommunityhealthworkersinugandaaligningincentiveswithpreferences