Cargando…

Biocompatibility study of lithium disilicate and zirconium oxide ceramics for esthetic dental abutments

PURPOSE: The increasing demand for esthetically pleasing results has contributed to the use of ceramics for dental implant abutments. The aim of this study was to compare the biological response of epithelial tissue cultivated on lithium disilicate (LS(2)) and zirconium oxide (ZrO(2)) ceramics. Unde...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brunot-Gohin, Céline, Duval, Jean-Luc, Verbeke, Sandra, Belanger, Kayla, Pezron, Isabelle, Kugel, Gérard, Laurent-Maquin, Dominique, Gangloff, Sophie, Egles, Christophe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Academy of Periodontology 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5200862/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28050314
http://dx.doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2016.46.6.362
_version_ 1782489254985728000
author Brunot-Gohin, Céline
Duval, Jean-Luc
Verbeke, Sandra
Belanger, Kayla
Pezron, Isabelle
Kugel, Gérard
Laurent-Maquin, Dominique
Gangloff, Sophie
Egles, Christophe
author_facet Brunot-Gohin, Céline
Duval, Jean-Luc
Verbeke, Sandra
Belanger, Kayla
Pezron, Isabelle
Kugel, Gérard
Laurent-Maquin, Dominique
Gangloff, Sophie
Egles, Christophe
author_sort Brunot-Gohin, Céline
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The increasing demand for esthetically pleasing results has contributed to the use of ceramics for dental implant abutments. The aim of this study was to compare the biological response of epithelial tissue cultivated on lithium disilicate (LS(2)) and zirconium oxide (ZrO(2)) ceramics. Understanding the relevant physicochemical and mechanical properties of these ceramics will help identify the optimal material for facilitating gingival wound closure. METHODS: Both biomaterials were prepared with 2 different surface treatments: raw and polished. Their physicochemical characteristics were analyzed by contact angle measurements, scanning white-light interferometry, and scanning electron microscopy. An organotypic culture was then performed using a chicken epithelium model to simulate peri-implant soft tissue. We measured the contact angle, hydrophobicity, and roughness of the materials as well as the tissue behavior at their surfaces (cell migration and cell adhesion). RESULTS: The best cell migration was observed on ZrO(2) ceramic. Cell adhesion was also drastically lower on the polished ZrO(2) ceramic than on both the raw and polished LS(2). Evaluating various surface topographies of LS(2) showed that increasing surface roughness improved cell adhesion, leading to an increase of up to 13%. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that a biomaterial, here LS(2), can be modified using simple surface changes in order to finely modulate soft tissue adhesion. Strong adhesion at the abutment associated with weak migration assists in gingival wound healing. On the same material, polishing can reduce cell adhesion without drastically modifying cell migration. A comparison of LS(2) and ZrO(2) ceramic showed that LS(2) was more conducive to creating varying tissue reactions. Our results can help dental surgeons to choose, especially for esthetic implant abutments, the most appropriate biomaterial as well as the most appropriate surface treatment to use in accordance with specific clinical dental applications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5200862
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Korean Academy of Periodontology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52008622017-01-03 Biocompatibility study of lithium disilicate and zirconium oxide ceramics for esthetic dental abutments Brunot-Gohin, Céline Duval, Jean-Luc Verbeke, Sandra Belanger, Kayla Pezron, Isabelle Kugel, Gérard Laurent-Maquin, Dominique Gangloff, Sophie Egles, Christophe J Periodontal Implant Sci Research Article PURPOSE: The increasing demand for esthetically pleasing results has contributed to the use of ceramics for dental implant abutments. The aim of this study was to compare the biological response of epithelial tissue cultivated on lithium disilicate (LS(2)) and zirconium oxide (ZrO(2)) ceramics. Understanding the relevant physicochemical and mechanical properties of these ceramics will help identify the optimal material for facilitating gingival wound closure. METHODS: Both biomaterials were prepared with 2 different surface treatments: raw and polished. Their physicochemical characteristics were analyzed by contact angle measurements, scanning white-light interferometry, and scanning electron microscopy. An organotypic culture was then performed using a chicken epithelium model to simulate peri-implant soft tissue. We measured the contact angle, hydrophobicity, and roughness of the materials as well as the tissue behavior at their surfaces (cell migration and cell adhesion). RESULTS: The best cell migration was observed on ZrO(2) ceramic. Cell adhesion was also drastically lower on the polished ZrO(2) ceramic than on both the raw and polished LS(2). Evaluating various surface topographies of LS(2) showed that increasing surface roughness improved cell adhesion, leading to an increase of up to 13%. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that a biomaterial, here LS(2), can be modified using simple surface changes in order to finely modulate soft tissue adhesion. Strong adhesion at the abutment associated with weak migration assists in gingival wound healing. On the same material, polishing can reduce cell adhesion without drastically modifying cell migration. A comparison of LS(2) and ZrO(2) ceramic showed that LS(2) was more conducive to creating varying tissue reactions. Our results can help dental surgeons to choose, especially for esthetic implant abutments, the most appropriate biomaterial as well as the most appropriate surface treatment to use in accordance with specific clinical dental applications. Korean Academy of Periodontology 2016-12 2016-12-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5200862/ /pubmed/28050314 http://dx.doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2016.46.6.362 Text en Copyright © 2016 Korean Academy of Periodontology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Brunot-Gohin, Céline
Duval, Jean-Luc
Verbeke, Sandra
Belanger, Kayla
Pezron, Isabelle
Kugel, Gérard
Laurent-Maquin, Dominique
Gangloff, Sophie
Egles, Christophe
Biocompatibility study of lithium disilicate and zirconium oxide ceramics for esthetic dental abutments
title Biocompatibility study of lithium disilicate and zirconium oxide ceramics for esthetic dental abutments
title_full Biocompatibility study of lithium disilicate and zirconium oxide ceramics for esthetic dental abutments
title_fullStr Biocompatibility study of lithium disilicate and zirconium oxide ceramics for esthetic dental abutments
title_full_unstemmed Biocompatibility study of lithium disilicate and zirconium oxide ceramics for esthetic dental abutments
title_short Biocompatibility study of lithium disilicate and zirconium oxide ceramics for esthetic dental abutments
title_sort biocompatibility study of lithium disilicate and zirconium oxide ceramics for esthetic dental abutments
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5200862/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28050314
http://dx.doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2016.46.6.362
work_keys_str_mv AT brunotgohinceline biocompatibilitystudyoflithiumdisilicateandzirconiumoxideceramicsforestheticdentalabutments
AT duvaljeanluc biocompatibilitystudyoflithiumdisilicateandzirconiumoxideceramicsforestheticdentalabutments
AT verbekesandra biocompatibilitystudyoflithiumdisilicateandzirconiumoxideceramicsforestheticdentalabutments
AT belangerkayla biocompatibilitystudyoflithiumdisilicateandzirconiumoxideceramicsforestheticdentalabutments
AT pezronisabelle biocompatibilitystudyoflithiumdisilicateandzirconiumoxideceramicsforestheticdentalabutments
AT kugelgerard biocompatibilitystudyoflithiumdisilicateandzirconiumoxideceramicsforestheticdentalabutments
AT laurentmaquindominique biocompatibilitystudyoflithiumdisilicateandzirconiumoxideceramicsforestheticdentalabutments
AT gangloffsophie biocompatibilitystudyoflithiumdisilicateandzirconiumoxideceramicsforestheticdentalabutments
AT egleschristophe biocompatibilitystudyoflithiumdisilicateandzirconiumoxideceramicsforestheticdentalabutments