Cargando…
Biocompatibility study of lithium disilicate and zirconium oxide ceramics for esthetic dental abutments
PURPOSE: The increasing demand for esthetically pleasing results has contributed to the use of ceramics for dental implant abutments. The aim of this study was to compare the biological response of epithelial tissue cultivated on lithium disilicate (LS(2)) and zirconium oxide (ZrO(2)) ceramics. Unde...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Academy of Periodontology
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5200862/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28050314 http://dx.doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2016.46.6.362 |
_version_ | 1782489254985728000 |
---|---|
author | Brunot-Gohin, Céline Duval, Jean-Luc Verbeke, Sandra Belanger, Kayla Pezron, Isabelle Kugel, Gérard Laurent-Maquin, Dominique Gangloff, Sophie Egles, Christophe |
author_facet | Brunot-Gohin, Céline Duval, Jean-Luc Verbeke, Sandra Belanger, Kayla Pezron, Isabelle Kugel, Gérard Laurent-Maquin, Dominique Gangloff, Sophie Egles, Christophe |
author_sort | Brunot-Gohin, Céline |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The increasing demand for esthetically pleasing results has contributed to the use of ceramics for dental implant abutments. The aim of this study was to compare the biological response of epithelial tissue cultivated on lithium disilicate (LS(2)) and zirconium oxide (ZrO(2)) ceramics. Understanding the relevant physicochemical and mechanical properties of these ceramics will help identify the optimal material for facilitating gingival wound closure. METHODS: Both biomaterials were prepared with 2 different surface treatments: raw and polished. Their physicochemical characteristics were analyzed by contact angle measurements, scanning white-light interferometry, and scanning electron microscopy. An organotypic culture was then performed using a chicken epithelium model to simulate peri-implant soft tissue. We measured the contact angle, hydrophobicity, and roughness of the materials as well as the tissue behavior at their surfaces (cell migration and cell adhesion). RESULTS: The best cell migration was observed on ZrO(2) ceramic. Cell adhesion was also drastically lower on the polished ZrO(2) ceramic than on both the raw and polished LS(2). Evaluating various surface topographies of LS(2) showed that increasing surface roughness improved cell adhesion, leading to an increase of up to 13%. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that a biomaterial, here LS(2), can be modified using simple surface changes in order to finely modulate soft tissue adhesion. Strong adhesion at the abutment associated with weak migration assists in gingival wound healing. On the same material, polishing can reduce cell adhesion without drastically modifying cell migration. A comparison of LS(2) and ZrO(2) ceramic showed that LS(2) was more conducive to creating varying tissue reactions. Our results can help dental surgeons to choose, especially for esthetic implant abutments, the most appropriate biomaterial as well as the most appropriate surface treatment to use in accordance with specific clinical dental applications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5200862 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Korean Academy of Periodontology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52008622017-01-03 Biocompatibility study of lithium disilicate and zirconium oxide ceramics for esthetic dental abutments Brunot-Gohin, Céline Duval, Jean-Luc Verbeke, Sandra Belanger, Kayla Pezron, Isabelle Kugel, Gérard Laurent-Maquin, Dominique Gangloff, Sophie Egles, Christophe J Periodontal Implant Sci Research Article PURPOSE: The increasing demand for esthetically pleasing results has contributed to the use of ceramics for dental implant abutments. The aim of this study was to compare the biological response of epithelial tissue cultivated on lithium disilicate (LS(2)) and zirconium oxide (ZrO(2)) ceramics. Understanding the relevant physicochemical and mechanical properties of these ceramics will help identify the optimal material for facilitating gingival wound closure. METHODS: Both biomaterials were prepared with 2 different surface treatments: raw and polished. Their physicochemical characteristics were analyzed by contact angle measurements, scanning white-light interferometry, and scanning electron microscopy. An organotypic culture was then performed using a chicken epithelium model to simulate peri-implant soft tissue. We measured the contact angle, hydrophobicity, and roughness of the materials as well as the tissue behavior at their surfaces (cell migration and cell adhesion). RESULTS: The best cell migration was observed on ZrO(2) ceramic. Cell adhesion was also drastically lower on the polished ZrO(2) ceramic than on both the raw and polished LS(2). Evaluating various surface topographies of LS(2) showed that increasing surface roughness improved cell adhesion, leading to an increase of up to 13%. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that a biomaterial, here LS(2), can be modified using simple surface changes in order to finely modulate soft tissue adhesion. Strong adhesion at the abutment associated with weak migration assists in gingival wound healing. On the same material, polishing can reduce cell adhesion without drastically modifying cell migration. A comparison of LS(2) and ZrO(2) ceramic showed that LS(2) was more conducive to creating varying tissue reactions. Our results can help dental surgeons to choose, especially for esthetic implant abutments, the most appropriate biomaterial as well as the most appropriate surface treatment to use in accordance with specific clinical dental applications. Korean Academy of Periodontology 2016-12 2016-12-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5200862/ /pubmed/28050314 http://dx.doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2016.46.6.362 Text en Copyright © 2016 Korean Academy of Periodontology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). |
spellingShingle | Research Article Brunot-Gohin, Céline Duval, Jean-Luc Verbeke, Sandra Belanger, Kayla Pezron, Isabelle Kugel, Gérard Laurent-Maquin, Dominique Gangloff, Sophie Egles, Christophe Biocompatibility study of lithium disilicate and zirconium oxide ceramics for esthetic dental abutments |
title | Biocompatibility study of lithium disilicate and zirconium oxide ceramics for esthetic dental abutments |
title_full | Biocompatibility study of lithium disilicate and zirconium oxide ceramics for esthetic dental abutments |
title_fullStr | Biocompatibility study of lithium disilicate and zirconium oxide ceramics for esthetic dental abutments |
title_full_unstemmed | Biocompatibility study of lithium disilicate and zirconium oxide ceramics for esthetic dental abutments |
title_short | Biocompatibility study of lithium disilicate and zirconium oxide ceramics for esthetic dental abutments |
title_sort | biocompatibility study of lithium disilicate and zirconium oxide ceramics for esthetic dental abutments |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5200862/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28050314 http://dx.doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2016.46.6.362 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brunotgohinceline biocompatibilitystudyoflithiumdisilicateandzirconiumoxideceramicsforestheticdentalabutments AT duvaljeanluc biocompatibilitystudyoflithiumdisilicateandzirconiumoxideceramicsforestheticdentalabutments AT verbekesandra biocompatibilitystudyoflithiumdisilicateandzirconiumoxideceramicsforestheticdentalabutments AT belangerkayla biocompatibilitystudyoflithiumdisilicateandzirconiumoxideceramicsforestheticdentalabutments AT pezronisabelle biocompatibilitystudyoflithiumdisilicateandzirconiumoxideceramicsforestheticdentalabutments AT kugelgerard biocompatibilitystudyoflithiumdisilicateandzirconiumoxideceramicsforestheticdentalabutments AT laurentmaquindominique biocompatibilitystudyoflithiumdisilicateandzirconiumoxideceramicsforestheticdentalabutments AT gangloffsophie biocompatibilitystudyoflithiumdisilicateandzirconiumoxideceramicsforestheticdentalabutments AT egleschristophe biocompatibilitystudyoflithiumdisilicateandzirconiumoxideceramicsforestheticdentalabutments |