Cargando…

Language in Context: MEG Evidence for Modality-General and -Specific Responses to Reference Resolution

Successful language comprehension critically depends on our ability to link linguistic expressions to the entities they refer to. Without reference resolution, newly encountered language cannot be related to previously acquired knowledge. The human experience includes many different types of referen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brodbeck, Christian, Gwilliams, Laura, Pylkkänen, Liina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Society for Neuroscience 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5200920/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28058272
http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0145-16.2016
_version_ 1782489266132090880
author Brodbeck, Christian
Gwilliams, Laura
Pylkkänen, Liina
author_facet Brodbeck, Christian
Gwilliams, Laura
Pylkkänen, Liina
author_sort Brodbeck, Christian
collection PubMed
description Successful language comprehension critically depends on our ability to link linguistic expressions to the entities they refer to. Without reference resolution, newly encountered language cannot be related to previously acquired knowledge. The human experience includes many different types of referents, some visual, some auditory, some very abstract. Does the neural basis of reference resolution depend on the nature of the referents, or do our brains use a modality-general mechanism for linking meanings to referents? Here we report evidence for both. Using magnetoencephalography (MEG), we varied both the modality of referents, which consisted either of visual or auditory objects, and the point at which reference resolution was possible within sentences. Source-localized MEG responses revealed brain activity associated with reference resolution that was independent of the modality of the referents, localized to the medial parietal lobe and starting ∼415 ms after the onset of reference resolving words. A modality-specific response to reference resolution in auditory domains was also found, in the vicinity of auditory cortex. Our results suggest that referential language processing cannot be reduced to processing in classical language regions and representations of the referential domain in modality-specific neural systems. Instead, our results suggest that reference resolution engages medial parietal cortex, which supports a mechanism for referential processing regardless of the content modality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5200920
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Society for Neuroscience
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52009202017-01-05 Language in Context: MEG Evidence for Modality-General and -Specific Responses to Reference Resolution Brodbeck, Christian Gwilliams, Laura Pylkkänen, Liina eNeuro New Research Successful language comprehension critically depends on our ability to link linguistic expressions to the entities they refer to. Without reference resolution, newly encountered language cannot be related to previously acquired knowledge. The human experience includes many different types of referents, some visual, some auditory, some very abstract. Does the neural basis of reference resolution depend on the nature of the referents, or do our brains use a modality-general mechanism for linking meanings to referents? Here we report evidence for both. Using magnetoencephalography (MEG), we varied both the modality of referents, which consisted either of visual or auditory objects, and the point at which reference resolution was possible within sentences. Source-localized MEG responses revealed brain activity associated with reference resolution that was independent of the modality of the referents, localized to the medial parietal lobe and starting ∼415 ms after the onset of reference resolving words. A modality-specific response to reference resolution in auditory domains was also found, in the vicinity of auditory cortex. Our results suggest that referential language processing cannot be reduced to processing in classical language regions and representations of the referential domain in modality-specific neural systems. Instead, our results suggest that reference resolution engages medial parietal cortex, which supports a mechanism for referential processing regardless of the content modality. Society for Neuroscience 2016-12-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5200920/ /pubmed/28058272 http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0145-16.2016 Text en Copyright © 2016 Brodbeck et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle New Research
Brodbeck, Christian
Gwilliams, Laura
Pylkkänen, Liina
Language in Context: MEG Evidence for Modality-General and -Specific Responses to Reference Resolution
title Language in Context: MEG Evidence for Modality-General and -Specific Responses to Reference Resolution
title_full Language in Context: MEG Evidence for Modality-General and -Specific Responses to Reference Resolution
title_fullStr Language in Context: MEG Evidence for Modality-General and -Specific Responses to Reference Resolution
title_full_unstemmed Language in Context: MEG Evidence for Modality-General and -Specific Responses to Reference Resolution
title_short Language in Context: MEG Evidence for Modality-General and -Specific Responses to Reference Resolution
title_sort language in context: meg evidence for modality-general and -specific responses to reference resolution
topic New Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5200920/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28058272
http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0145-16.2016
work_keys_str_mv AT brodbeckchristian languageincontextmegevidenceformodalitygeneralandspecificresponsestoreferenceresolution
AT gwilliamslaura languageincontextmegevidenceformodalitygeneralandspecificresponsestoreferenceresolution
AT pylkkanenliina languageincontextmegevidenceformodalitygeneralandspecificresponsestoreferenceresolution