Cargando…

Comparison of Tobacco Control Programs Worldwide: A Quantitative Analysis of the 2015 World Health Organization MPOWER Report

BACKGROUND: A report of the activities of countries worldwide for six main policies to control tobacco use is published once every 2 years by the World Health Organization (WHO). Our objective was to perform a quantitative analysis for it in countries and regions to make a simple view of its program...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Heydari, Gholamreza, Chamyani, Fahimeh, Masjedi, Mohammad Reza, Fadaizadeh, Lida
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5200974/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28105292
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2008-7802.195562
_version_ 1782489275993948160
author Heydari, Gholamreza
Chamyani, Fahimeh
Masjedi, Mohammad Reza
Fadaizadeh, Lida
author_facet Heydari, Gholamreza
Chamyani, Fahimeh
Masjedi, Mohammad Reza
Fadaizadeh, Lida
author_sort Heydari, Gholamreza
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A report of the activities of countries worldwide for six main policies to control tobacco use is published once every 2 years by the World Health Organization (WHO). Our objective was to perform a quantitative analysis for it in countries and regions to make a simple view of its programs. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study by filling out a validated checklist from the 2015 WHO Report (MPOWER). All ten MPOWER measures got scores and were entered independently by two individuals and a third party compared the values. RESULTS: Fifteen countries, which acquired the highest scores (85% of total 37), included Panama and Turkey with 35, Brazil and Uruguay with 34, Ireland, United Kingdom, Iran, Brunei, Argentina, and Costa Rica with 33, and Australia, Nepal, Thailand, Canada, and Mauritius with 32 points. CONCLUSIONS: Comparison of scores of different countries in this respect can be beneficial since it creates a challenge for the health policymakers to find weakness of the tobacco control programs to work on it.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5200974
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52009742017-01-19 Comparison of Tobacco Control Programs Worldwide: A Quantitative Analysis of the 2015 World Health Organization MPOWER Report Heydari, Gholamreza Chamyani, Fahimeh Masjedi, Mohammad Reza Fadaizadeh, Lida Int J Prev Med Brief Communication BACKGROUND: A report of the activities of countries worldwide for six main policies to control tobacco use is published once every 2 years by the World Health Organization (WHO). Our objective was to perform a quantitative analysis for it in countries and regions to make a simple view of its programs. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study by filling out a validated checklist from the 2015 WHO Report (MPOWER). All ten MPOWER measures got scores and were entered independently by two individuals and a third party compared the values. RESULTS: Fifteen countries, which acquired the highest scores (85% of total 37), included Panama and Turkey with 35, Brazil and Uruguay with 34, Ireland, United Kingdom, Iran, Brunei, Argentina, and Costa Rica with 33, and Australia, Nepal, Thailand, Canada, and Mauritius with 32 points. CONCLUSIONS: Comparison of scores of different countries in this respect can be beneficial since it creates a challenge for the health policymakers to find weakness of the tobacco control programs to work on it. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016-12-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5200974/ /pubmed/28105292 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2008-7802.195562 Text en Copyright: © 2016 International Journal of Preventive Medicine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Brief Communication
Heydari, Gholamreza
Chamyani, Fahimeh
Masjedi, Mohammad Reza
Fadaizadeh, Lida
Comparison of Tobacco Control Programs Worldwide: A Quantitative Analysis of the 2015 World Health Organization MPOWER Report
title Comparison of Tobacco Control Programs Worldwide: A Quantitative Analysis of the 2015 World Health Organization MPOWER Report
title_full Comparison of Tobacco Control Programs Worldwide: A Quantitative Analysis of the 2015 World Health Organization MPOWER Report
title_fullStr Comparison of Tobacco Control Programs Worldwide: A Quantitative Analysis of the 2015 World Health Organization MPOWER Report
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Tobacco Control Programs Worldwide: A Quantitative Analysis of the 2015 World Health Organization MPOWER Report
title_short Comparison of Tobacco Control Programs Worldwide: A Quantitative Analysis of the 2015 World Health Organization MPOWER Report
title_sort comparison of tobacco control programs worldwide: a quantitative analysis of the 2015 world health organization mpower report
topic Brief Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5200974/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28105292
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2008-7802.195562
work_keys_str_mv AT heydarigholamreza comparisonoftobaccocontrolprogramsworldwideaquantitativeanalysisofthe2015worldhealthorganizationmpowerreport
AT chamyanifahimeh comparisonoftobaccocontrolprogramsworldwideaquantitativeanalysisofthe2015worldhealthorganizationmpowerreport
AT masjedimohammadreza comparisonoftobaccocontrolprogramsworldwideaquantitativeanalysisofthe2015worldhealthorganizationmpowerreport
AT fadaizadehlida comparisonoftobaccocontrolprogramsworldwideaquantitativeanalysisofthe2015worldhealthorganizationmpowerreport