Cargando…
Comparison of Tobacco Control Programs Worldwide: A Quantitative Analysis of the 2015 World Health Organization MPOWER Report
BACKGROUND: A report of the activities of countries worldwide for six main policies to control tobacco use is published once every 2 years by the World Health Organization (WHO). Our objective was to perform a quantitative analysis for it in countries and regions to make a simple view of its program...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5200974/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28105292 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2008-7802.195562 |
_version_ | 1782489275993948160 |
---|---|
author | Heydari, Gholamreza Chamyani, Fahimeh Masjedi, Mohammad Reza Fadaizadeh, Lida |
author_facet | Heydari, Gholamreza Chamyani, Fahimeh Masjedi, Mohammad Reza Fadaizadeh, Lida |
author_sort | Heydari, Gholamreza |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: A report of the activities of countries worldwide for six main policies to control tobacco use is published once every 2 years by the World Health Organization (WHO). Our objective was to perform a quantitative analysis for it in countries and regions to make a simple view of its programs. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study by filling out a validated checklist from the 2015 WHO Report (MPOWER). All ten MPOWER measures got scores and were entered independently by two individuals and a third party compared the values. RESULTS: Fifteen countries, which acquired the highest scores (85% of total 37), included Panama and Turkey with 35, Brazil and Uruguay with 34, Ireland, United Kingdom, Iran, Brunei, Argentina, and Costa Rica with 33, and Australia, Nepal, Thailand, Canada, and Mauritius with 32 points. CONCLUSIONS: Comparison of scores of different countries in this respect can be beneficial since it creates a challenge for the health policymakers to find weakness of the tobacco control programs to work on it. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5200974 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52009742017-01-19 Comparison of Tobacco Control Programs Worldwide: A Quantitative Analysis of the 2015 World Health Organization MPOWER Report Heydari, Gholamreza Chamyani, Fahimeh Masjedi, Mohammad Reza Fadaizadeh, Lida Int J Prev Med Brief Communication BACKGROUND: A report of the activities of countries worldwide for six main policies to control tobacco use is published once every 2 years by the World Health Organization (WHO). Our objective was to perform a quantitative analysis for it in countries and regions to make a simple view of its programs. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study by filling out a validated checklist from the 2015 WHO Report (MPOWER). All ten MPOWER measures got scores and were entered independently by two individuals and a third party compared the values. RESULTS: Fifteen countries, which acquired the highest scores (85% of total 37), included Panama and Turkey with 35, Brazil and Uruguay with 34, Ireland, United Kingdom, Iran, Brunei, Argentina, and Costa Rica with 33, and Australia, Nepal, Thailand, Canada, and Mauritius with 32 points. CONCLUSIONS: Comparison of scores of different countries in this respect can be beneficial since it creates a challenge for the health policymakers to find weakness of the tobacco control programs to work on it. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016-12-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5200974/ /pubmed/28105292 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2008-7802.195562 Text en Copyright: © 2016 International Journal of Preventive Medicine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Brief Communication Heydari, Gholamreza Chamyani, Fahimeh Masjedi, Mohammad Reza Fadaizadeh, Lida Comparison of Tobacco Control Programs Worldwide: A Quantitative Analysis of the 2015 World Health Organization MPOWER Report |
title | Comparison of Tobacco Control Programs Worldwide: A Quantitative Analysis of the 2015 World Health Organization MPOWER Report |
title_full | Comparison of Tobacco Control Programs Worldwide: A Quantitative Analysis of the 2015 World Health Organization MPOWER Report |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Tobacco Control Programs Worldwide: A Quantitative Analysis of the 2015 World Health Organization MPOWER Report |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Tobacco Control Programs Worldwide: A Quantitative Analysis of the 2015 World Health Organization MPOWER Report |
title_short | Comparison of Tobacco Control Programs Worldwide: A Quantitative Analysis of the 2015 World Health Organization MPOWER Report |
title_sort | comparison of tobacco control programs worldwide: a quantitative analysis of the 2015 world health organization mpower report |
topic | Brief Communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5200974/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28105292 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2008-7802.195562 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT heydarigholamreza comparisonoftobaccocontrolprogramsworldwideaquantitativeanalysisofthe2015worldhealthorganizationmpowerreport AT chamyanifahimeh comparisonoftobaccocontrolprogramsworldwideaquantitativeanalysisofthe2015worldhealthorganizationmpowerreport AT masjedimohammadreza comparisonoftobaccocontrolprogramsworldwideaquantitativeanalysisofthe2015worldhealthorganizationmpowerreport AT fadaizadehlida comparisonoftobaccocontrolprogramsworldwideaquantitativeanalysisofthe2015worldhealthorganizationmpowerreport |