Cargando…

Risk Profiles for Barrett’s Esophagus Differ between New and Prevalent, and Long- and Short-Segment Cases

BACKGROUND: Previous studies on Barrett’s esophagus (BE) risk factors have had differing case definitions and control groups. The purpose of this study was to examine differences in risk factors between newly diagnosed vs. prevalent BE, long- vs. short-segment BE, and endoscopy-only BE without speci...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tan, Mimi C., Murrey-Ittmann, Jackson, Nguyen, Theresa, Ketwaroo, Gyanprakash A., El-Serag, Hashem B., Thrift, Aaron P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5201279/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28036381
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169250
_version_ 1782489315236904960
author Tan, Mimi C.
Murrey-Ittmann, Jackson
Nguyen, Theresa
Ketwaroo, Gyanprakash A.
El-Serag, Hashem B.
Thrift, Aaron P.
author_facet Tan, Mimi C.
Murrey-Ittmann, Jackson
Nguyen, Theresa
Ketwaroo, Gyanprakash A.
El-Serag, Hashem B.
Thrift, Aaron P.
author_sort Tan, Mimi C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Previous studies on Barrett’s esophagus (BE) risk factors have had differing case definitions and control groups. The purpose of this study was to examine differences in risk factors between newly diagnosed vs. prevalent BE, long- vs. short-segment BE, and endoscopy-only BE without specialized intestinal metaplasia (SIM). METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study among eligible patients scheduled for elective esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and patients eligible for screening colonoscopy, recruited from primary care clinics at a Veterans Affairs center. All participants completed a survey on demographics, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms and medication use prior to undergoing study EGD. We compared BE cases separately to two control groups: 503 primary care controls and 1353 endoscopy controls. Associations between risk factors and differing BE case definitions were evaluated with multivariate logistic regression models. RESULTS: For comparisons with primary care controls, early onset frequent GERD symptoms were more strongly associated with risk of long-segment BE (OR 19.9; 95% CI 7.96–49.7) than short-segment BE (OR 8.54; 95% CI 3.85–18.9). Likewise, the inverse association with H. pylori infection was stronger for long-segment BE (OR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.26–0.79) than short-segment BE (OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.48–1.05). GERD symptoms and H. pylori infection was also more strongly associated with prevalent BE than newly diagnosed BE. Few differences were observed between BE cases and endoscopy controls. Endoscopy-only BE was associated with GERD symptoms (OR 2.25, 95% CI 1.32–3.85) and PPI/H2RA use (OR 4.44; 95% CI 2.61–7.54) but to a smaller degree than BE with SIM. CONCLUSION: We found differences in the strength and profiles of risk factors for BE. The findings support that epidemiological studies of BE should make a distinction between long and short, new and prevalent, endoscopy-only and BE with SIM as well as type of controls.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5201279
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52012792017-01-19 Risk Profiles for Barrett’s Esophagus Differ between New and Prevalent, and Long- and Short-Segment Cases Tan, Mimi C. Murrey-Ittmann, Jackson Nguyen, Theresa Ketwaroo, Gyanprakash A. El-Serag, Hashem B. Thrift, Aaron P. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Previous studies on Barrett’s esophagus (BE) risk factors have had differing case definitions and control groups. The purpose of this study was to examine differences in risk factors between newly diagnosed vs. prevalent BE, long- vs. short-segment BE, and endoscopy-only BE without specialized intestinal metaplasia (SIM). METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study among eligible patients scheduled for elective esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and patients eligible for screening colonoscopy, recruited from primary care clinics at a Veterans Affairs center. All participants completed a survey on demographics, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms and medication use prior to undergoing study EGD. We compared BE cases separately to two control groups: 503 primary care controls and 1353 endoscopy controls. Associations between risk factors and differing BE case definitions were evaluated with multivariate logistic regression models. RESULTS: For comparisons with primary care controls, early onset frequent GERD symptoms were more strongly associated with risk of long-segment BE (OR 19.9; 95% CI 7.96–49.7) than short-segment BE (OR 8.54; 95% CI 3.85–18.9). Likewise, the inverse association with H. pylori infection was stronger for long-segment BE (OR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.26–0.79) than short-segment BE (OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.48–1.05). GERD symptoms and H. pylori infection was also more strongly associated with prevalent BE than newly diagnosed BE. Few differences were observed between BE cases and endoscopy controls. Endoscopy-only BE was associated with GERD symptoms (OR 2.25, 95% CI 1.32–3.85) and PPI/H2RA use (OR 4.44; 95% CI 2.61–7.54) but to a smaller degree than BE with SIM. CONCLUSION: We found differences in the strength and profiles of risk factors for BE. The findings support that epidemiological studies of BE should make a distinction between long and short, new and prevalent, endoscopy-only and BE with SIM as well as type of controls. Public Library of Science 2016-12-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5201279/ /pubmed/28036381 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169250 Text en © 2016 Tan et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Tan, Mimi C.
Murrey-Ittmann, Jackson
Nguyen, Theresa
Ketwaroo, Gyanprakash A.
El-Serag, Hashem B.
Thrift, Aaron P.
Risk Profiles for Barrett’s Esophagus Differ between New and Prevalent, and Long- and Short-Segment Cases
title Risk Profiles for Barrett’s Esophagus Differ between New and Prevalent, and Long- and Short-Segment Cases
title_full Risk Profiles for Barrett’s Esophagus Differ between New and Prevalent, and Long- and Short-Segment Cases
title_fullStr Risk Profiles for Barrett’s Esophagus Differ between New and Prevalent, and Long- and Short-Segment Cases
title_full_unstemmed Risk Profiles for Barrett’s Esophagus Differ between New and Prevalent, and Long- and Short-Segment Cases
title_short Risk Profiles for Barrett’s Esophagus Differ between New and Prevalent, and Long- and Short-Segment Cases
title_sort risk profiles for barrett’s esophagus differ between new and prevalent, and long- and short-segment cases
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5201279/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28036381
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169250
work_keys_str_mv AT tanmimic riskprofilesforbarrettsesophagusdifferbetweennewandprevalentandlongandshortsegmentcases
AT murreyittmannjackson riskprofilesforbarrettsesophagusdifferbetweennewandprevalentandlongandshortsegmentcases
AT nguyentheresa riskprofilesforbarrettsesophagusdifferbetweennewandprevalentandlongandshortsegmentcases
AT ketwaroogyanprakasha riskprofilesforbarrettsesophagusdifferbetweennewandprevalentandlongandshortsegmentcases
AT elseraghashemb riskprofilesforbarrettsesophagusdifferbetweennewandprevalentandlongandshortsegmentcases
AT thriftaaronp riskprofilesforbarrettsesophagusdifferbetweennewandprevalentandlongandshortsegmentcases