Cargando…
Sustainable Development in Surgery: The Health, Poverty, and Equity Impacts of Charitable Surgery in Uganda
BACKGROUND: The recently adopted Sustainable Development Goals call for the end of poverty and the equitable provision of healthcare. These goals are often at odds, however: health seeking can lead to catastrophic spending, an outcome for which cancer patients and the poor in resource-limited settin...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5201287/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28036357 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168867 |
_version_ | 1782489317005852672 |
---|---|
author | Shrime, Mark G. Sekidde, Serufusa Linden, Allison Cohen, Jessica L. Weinstein, Milton C. Salomon, Joshua A. |
author_facet | Shrime, Mark G. Sekidde, Serufusa Linden, Allison Cohen, Jessica L. Weinstein, Milton C. Salomon, Joshua A. |
author_sort | Shrime, Mark G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The recently adopted Sustainable Development Goals call for the end of poverty and the equitable provision of healthcare. These goals are often at odds, however: health seeking can lead to catastrophic spending, an outcome for which cancer patients and the poor in resource-limited settings are at particularly high risk. How various health policies affect the additional aims of financial wellbeing and equity is poorly understood. This paper evaluates the health, financial, and equity impacts of governmental and charitable policies for surgical oncology in a resource-limited setting. METHODS: Three charitable platforms for surgical oncology delivery in Uganda were compared to six governmental policies aimed at improving healthcare access. An extended cost-effectiveness analysis using an agent-based simulation model examined the numbers of lives saved, catastrophic expenditure averted, impoverishment averted, costs, and the distribution of benefits across the wealth spectrum. FINDINGS: Of the nine policies and platforms evaluated, two were able to provide simultaneous health and financial benefits efficiently and equitably: mobile surgical units and governmental policies that simultaneously address surgical scaleup, the cost of surgery, and the cost of transportation. Policies that only remove user fees are dominated, as is the commonly employed short-term “surgical mission trip”. These results are robust to scenario and sensitivity analyses. INTERPRETATION: The most common platforms for increasing access to surgical care appear unable to provide health and financial risk protection equitably. On the other hand, mobile surgical units, to date an underutilized delivery platform, are able to deliver surgical oncology in a manner that meets sustainable development goals by improving health, financial solvency, and equity. These platforms compare favorably with policies that holistically address surgical delivery and should be considered as countries strengthen health systems. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5201287 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52012872017-01-19 Sustainable Development in Surgery: The Health, Poverty, and Equity Impacts of Charitable Surgery in Uganda Shrime, Mark G. Sekidde, Serufusa Linden, Allison Cohen, Jessica L. Weinstein, Milton C. Salomon, Joshua A. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The recently adopted Sustainable Development Goals call for the end of poverty and the equitable provision of healthcare. These goals are often at odds, however: health seeking can lead to catastrophic spending, an outcome for which cancer patients and the poor in resource-limited settings are at particularly high risk. How various health policies affect the additional aims of financial wellbeing and equity is poorly understood. This paper evaluates the health, financial, and equity impacts of governmental and charitable policies for surgical oncology in a resource-limited setting. METHODS: Three charitable platforms for surgical oncology delivery in Uganda were compared to six governmental policies aimed at improving healthcare access. An extended cost-effectiveness analysis using an agent-based simulation model examined the numbers of lives saved, catastrophic expenditure averted, impoverishment averted, costs, and the distribution of benefits across the wealth spectrum. FINDINGS: Of the nine policies and platforms evaluated, two were able to provide simultaneous health and financial benefits efficiently and equitably: mobile surgical units and governmental policies that simultaneously address surgical scaleup, the cost of surgery, and the cost of transportation. Policies that only remove user fees are dominated, as is the commonly employed short-term “surgical mission trip”. These results are robust to scenario and sensitivity analyses. INTERPRETATION: The most common platforms for increasing access to surgical care appear unable to provide health and financial risk protection equitably. On the other hand, mobile surgical units, to date an underutilized delivery platform, are able to deliver surgical oncology in a manner that meets sustainable development goals by improving health, financial solvency, and equity. These platforms compare favorably with policies that holistically address surgical delivery and should be considered as countries strengthen health systems. Public Library of Science 2016-12-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5201287/ /pubmed/28036357 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168867 Text en © 2016 Shrime et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Shrime, Mark G. Sekidde, Serufusa Linden, Allison Cohen, Jessica L. Weinstein, Milton C. Salomon, Joshua A. Sustainable Development in Surgery: The Health, Poverty, and Equity Impacts of Charitable Surgery in Uganda |
title | Sustainable Development in Surgery: The Health, Poverty, and Equity Impacts of Charitable Surgery in Uganda |
title_full | Sustainable Development in Surgery: The Health, Poverty, and Equity Impacts of Charitable Surgery in Uganda |
title_fullStr | Sustainable Development in Surgery: The Health, Poverty, and Equity Impacts of Charitable Surgery in Uganda |
title_full_unstemmed | Sustainable Development in Surgery: The Health, Poverty, and Equity Impacts of Charitable Surgery in Uganda |
title_short | Sustainable Development in Surgery: The Health, Poverty, and Equity Impacts of Charitable Surgery in Uganda |
title_sort | sustainable development in surgery: the health, poverty, and equity impacts of charitable surgery in uganda |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5201287/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28036357 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168867 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shrimemarkg sustainabledevelopmentinsurgerythehealthpovertyandequityimpactsofcharitablesurgeryinuganda AT sekiddeserufusa sustainabledevelopmentinsurgerythehealthpovertyandequityimpactsofcharitablesurgeryinuganda AT lindenallison sustainabledevelopmentinsurgerythehealthpovertyandequityimpactsofcharitablesurgeryinuganda AT cohenjessical sustainabledevelopmentinsurgerythehealthpovertyandequityimpactsofcharitablesurgeryinuganda AT weinsteinmiltonc sustainabledevelopmentinsurgerythehealthpovertyandequityimpactsofcharitablesurgeryinuganda AT salomonjoshuaa sustainabledevelopmentinsurgerythehealthpovertyandequityimpactsofcharitablesurgeryinuganda |