Cargando…

Sustainable Development in Surgery: The Health, Poverty, and Equity Impacts of Charitable Surgery in Uganda

BACKGROUND: The recently adopted Sustainable Development Goals call for the end of poverty and the equitable provision of healthcare. These goals are often at odds, however: health seeking can lead to catastrophic spending, an outcome for which cancer patients and the poor in resource-limited settin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shrime, Mark G., Sekidde, Serufusa, Linden, Allison, Cohen, Jessica L., Weinstein, Milton C., Salomon, Joshua A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5201287/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28036357
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168867
_version_ 1782489317005852672
author Shrime, Mark G.
Sekidde, Serufusa
Linden, Allison
Cohen, Jessica L.
Weinstein, Milton C.
Salomon, Joshua A.
author_facet Shrime, Mark G.
Sekidde, Serufusa
Linden, Allison
Cohen, Jessica L.
Weinstein, Milton C.
Salomon, Joshua A.
author_sort Shrime, Mark G.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The recently adopted Sustainable Development Goals call for the end of poverty and the equitable provision of healthcare. These goals are often at odds, however: health seeking can lead to catastrophic spending, an outcome for which cancer patients and the poor in resource-limited settings are at particularly high risk. How various health policies affect the additional aims of financial wellbeing and equity is poorly understood. This paper evaluates the health, financial, and equity impacts of governmental and charitable policies for surgical oncology in a resource-limited setting. METHODS: Three charitable platforms for surgical oncology delivery in Uganda were compared to six governmental policies aimed at improving healthcare access. An extended cost-effectiveness analysis using an agent-based simulation model examined the numbers of lives saved, catastrophic expenditure averted, impoverishment averted, costs, and the distribution of benefits across the wealth spectrum. FINDINGS: Of the nine policies and platforms evaluated, two were able to provide simultaneous health and financial benefits efficiently and equitably: mobile surgical units and governmental policies that simultaneously address surgical scaleup, the cost of surgery, and the cost of transportation. Policies that only remove user fees are dominated, as is the commonly employed short-term “surgical mission trip”. These results are robust to scenario and sensitivity analyses. INTERPRETATION: The most common platforms for increasing access to surgical care appear unable to provide health and financial risk protection equitably. On the other hand, mobile surgical units, to date an underutilized delivery platform, are able to deliver surgical oncology in a manner that meets sustainable development goals by improving health, financial solvency, and equity. These platforms compare favorably with policies that holistically address surgical delivery and should be considered as countries strengthen health systems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5201287
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52012872017-01-19 Sustainable Development in Surgery: The Health, Poverty, and Equity Impacts of Charitable Surgery in Uganda Shrime, Mark G. Sekidde, Serufusa Linden, Allison Cohen, Jessica L. Weinstein, Milton C. Salomon, Joshua A. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The recently adopted Sustainable Development Goals call for the end of poverty and the equitable provision of healthcare. These goals are often at odds, however: health seeking can lead to catastrophic spending, an outcome for which cancer patients and the poor in resource-limited settings are at particularly high risk. How various health policies affect the additional aims of financial wellbeing and equity is poorly understood. This paper evaluates the health, financial, and equity impacts of governmental and charitable policies for surgical oncology in a resource-limited setting. METHODS: Three charitable platforms for surgical oncology delivery in Uganda were compared to six governmental policies aimed at improving healthcare access. An extended cost-effectiveness analysis using an agent-based simulation model examined the numbers of lives saved, catastrophic expenditure averted, impoverishment averted, costs, and the distribution of benefits across the wealth spectrum. FINDINGS: Of the nine policies and platforms evaluated, two were able to provide simultaneous health and financial benefits efficiently and equitably: mobile surgical units and governmental policies that simultaneously address surgical scaleup, the cost of surgery, and the cost of transportation. Policies that only remove user fees are dominated, as is the commonly employed short-term “surgical mission trip”. These results are robust to scenario and sensitivity analyses. INTERPRETATION: The most common platforms for increasing access to surgical care appear unable to provide health and financial risk protection equitably. On the other hand, mobile surgical units, to date an underutilized delivery platform, are able to deliver surgical oncology in a manner that meets sustainable development goals by improving health, financial solvency, and equity. These platforms compare favorably with policies that holistically address surgical delivery and should be considered as countries strengthen health systems. Public Library of Science 2016-12-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5201287/ /pubmed/28036357 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168867 Text en © 2016 Shrime et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Shrime, Mark G.
Sekidde, Serufusa
Linden, Allison
Cohen, Jessica L.
Weinstein, Milton C.
Salomon, Joshua A.
Sustainable Development in Surgery: The Health, Poverty, and Equity Impacts of Charitable Surgery in Uganda
title Sustainable Development in Surgery: The Health, Poverty, and Equity Impacts of Charitable Surgery in Uganda
title_full Sustainable Development in Surgery: The Health, Poverty, and Equity Impacts of Charitable Surgery in Uganda
title_fullStr Sustainable Development in Surgery: The Health, Poverty, and Equity Impacts of Charitable Surgery in Uganda
title_full_unstemmed Sustainable Development in Surgery: The Health, Poverty, and Equity Impacts of Charitable Surgery in Uganda
title_short Sustainable Development in Surgery: The Health, Poverty, and Equity Impacts of Charitable Surgery in Uganda
title_sort sustainable development in surgery: the health, poverty, and equity impacts of charitable surgery in uganda
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5201287/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28036357
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168867
work_keys_str_mv AT shrimemarkg sustainabledevelopmentinsurgerythehealthpovertyandequityimpactsofcharitablesurgeryinuganda
AT sekiddeserufusa sustainabledevelopmentinsurgerythehealthpovertyandequityimpactsofcharitablesurgeryinuganda
AT lindenallison sustainabledevelopmentinsurgerythehealthpovertyandequityimpactsofcharitablesurgeryinuganda
AT cohenjessical sustainabledevelopmentinsurgerythehealthpovertyandequityimpactsofcharitablesurgeryinuganda
AT weinsteinmiltonc sustainabledevelopmentinsurgerythehealthpovertyandequityimpactsofcharitablesurgeryinuganda
AT salomonjoshuaa sustainabledevelopmentinsurgerythehealthpovertyandequityimpactsofcharitablesurgeryinuganda