Cargando…

Hazard Management Dealt by Safety Professionals in Colleges: The Impact of Individual Factors

Identifying, evaluating, and controlling workplace hazards are important functions of safety professionals (SPs). The purpose of this study was to investigate the content and frequency of hazard management dealt by safety professionals in colleges. The authors also explored the effects of organizati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wu, Tsung-Chih, Chen, Chi-Hsiang, Yi, Nai-Wen, Lu, Pei-Chen, Yu, Shan-Chi, Wang, Chien-Peng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5201342/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27918474
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13121201
_version_ 1782489328262316032
author Wu, Tsung-Chih
Chen, Chi-Hsiang
Yi, Nai-Wen
Lu, Pei-Chen
Yu, Shan-Chi
Wang, Chien-Peng
author_facet Wu, Tsung-Chih
Chen, Chi-Hsiang
Yi, Nai-Wen
Lu, Pei-Chen
Yu, Shan-Chi
Wang, Chien-Peng
author_sort Wu, Tsung-Chih
collection PubMed
description Identifying, evaluating, and controlling workplace hazards are important functions of safety professionals (SPs). The purpose of this study was to investigate the content and frequency of hazard management dealt by safety professionals in colleges. The authors also explored the effects of organizational factors/individual factors on SPs’ perception of frequency of hazard management. The researchers conducted survey research to achieve the objective of this study. The researchers mailed questionnaires to 200 SPs in colleges after simple random sampling, then received a total of 144 valid responses (response rate = 72%). Exploratory factor analysis indicated that the hazard management scale (HMS) extracted five factors, including physical hazards, biological hazards, social and psychological hazards, ergonomic hazards, and chemical hazards. Moreover, the top 10 hazards that the survey results identified that safety professionals were most likely to deal with (in order of most to least frequent) were: organic solvents, illumination, other chemicals, machinery and equipment, fire and explosion, electricity, noise, specific chemicals, human error, and lifting/carrying. Finally, the results of one-way multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) indicated there were four individual factors that impacted the perceived frequency of hazard management which were of statistical and practical significance: job tenure in the college of employment, type of certification, gender, and overall job tenure. SPs within colleges and industries can now discuss plans revolving around these five areas instead of having to deal with all of the separate hazards.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5201342
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52013422016-12-30 Hazard Management Dealt by Safety Professionals in Colleges: The Impact of Individual Factors Wu, Tsung-Chih Chen, Chi-Hsiang Yi, Nai-Wen Lu, Pei-Chen Yu, Shan-Chi Wang, Chien-Peng Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Identifying, evaluating, and controlling workplace hazards are important functions of safety professionals (SPs). The purpose of this study was to investigate the content and frequency of hazard management dealt by safety professionals in colleges. The authors also explored the effects of organizational factors/individual factors on SPs’ perception of frequency of hazard management. The researchers conducted survey research to achieve the objective of this study. The researchers mailed questionnaires to 200 SPs in colleges after simple random sampling, then received a total of 144 valid responses (response rate = 72%). Exploratory factor analysis indicated that the hazard management scale (HMS) extracted five factors, including physical hazards, biological hazards, social and psychological hazards, ergonomic hazards, and chemical hazards. Moreover, the top 10 hazards that the survey results identified that safety professionals were most likely to deal with (in order of most to least frequent) were: organic solvents, illumination, other chemicals, machinery and equipment, fire and explosion, electricity, noise, specific chemicals, human error, and lifting/carrying. Finally, the results of one-way multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) indicated there were four individual factors that impacted the perceived frequency of hazard management which were of statistical and practical significance: job tenure in the college of employment, type of certification, gender, and overall job tenure. SPs within colleges and industries can now discuss plans revolving around these five areas instead of having to deal with all of the separate hazards. MDPI 2016-12-03 2016-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5201342/ /pubmed/27918474 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13121201 Text en © 2016 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Wu, Tsung-Chih
Chen, Chi-Hsiang
Yi, Nai-Wen
Lu, Pei-Chen
Yu, Shan-Chi
Wang, Chien-Peng
Hazard Management Dealt by Safety Professionals in Colleges: The Impact of Individual Factors
title Hazard Management Dealt by Safety Professionals in Colleges: The Impact of Individual Factors
title_full Hazard Management Dealt by Safety Professionals in Colleges: The Impact of Individual Factors
title_fullStr Hazard Management Dealt by Safety Professionals in Colleges: The Impact of Individual Factors
title_full_unstemmed Hazard Management Dealt by Safety Professionals in Colleges: The Impact of Individual Factors
title_short Hazard Management Dealt by Safety Professionals in Colleges: The Impact of Individual Factors
title_sort hazard management dealt by safety professionals in colleges: the impact of individual factors
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5201342/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27918474
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13121201
work_keys_str_mv AT wutsungchih hazardmanagementdealtbysafetyprofessionalsincollegestheimpactofindividualfactors
AT chenchihsiang hazardmanagementdealtbysafetyprofessionalsincollegestheimpactofindividualfactors
AT yinaiwen hazardmanagementdealtbysafetyprofessionalsincollegestheimpactofindividualfactors
AT lupeichen hazardmanagementdealtbysafetyprofessionalsincollegestheimpactofindividualfactors
AT yushanchi hazardmanagementdealtbysafetyprofessionalsincollegestheimpactofindividualfactors
AT wangchienpeng hazardmanagementdealtbysafetyprofessionalsincollegestheimpactofindividualfactors