Cargando…
Hazard Management Dealt by Safety Professionals in Colleges: The Impact of Individual Factors
Identifying, evaluating, and controlling workplace hazards are important functions of safety professionals (SPs). The purpose of this study was to investigate the content and frequency of hazard management dealt by safety professionals in colleges. The authors also explored the effects of organizati...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5201342/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27918474 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13121201 |
_version_ | 1782489328262316032 |
---|---|
author | Wu, Tsung-Chih Chen, Chi-Hsiang Yi, Nai-Wen Lu, Pei-Chen Yu, Shan-Chi Wang, Chien-Peng |
author_facet | Wu, Tsung-Chih Chen, Chi-Hsiang Yi, Nai-Wen Lu, Pei-Chen Yu, Shan-Chi Wang, Chien-Peng |
author_sort | Wu, Tsung-Chih |
collection | PubMed |
description | Identifying, evaluating, and controlling workplace hazards are important functions of safety professionals (SPs). The purpose of this study was to investigate the content and frequency of hazard management dealt by safety professionals in colleges. The authors also explored the effects of organizational factors/individual factors on SPs’ perception of frequency of hazard management. The researchers conducted survey research to achieve the objective of this study. The researchers mailed questionnaires to 200 SPs in colleges after simple random sampling, then received a total of 144 valid responses (response rate = 72%). Exploratory factor analysis indicated that the hazard management scale (HMS) extracted five factors, including physical hazards, biological hazards, social and psychological hazards, ergonomic hazards, and chemical hazards. Moreover, the top 10 hazards that the survey results identified that safety professionals were most likely to deal with (in order of most to least frequent) were: organic solvents, illumination, other chemicals, machinery and equipment, fire and explosion, electricity, noise, specific chemicals, human error, and lifting/carrying. Finally, the results of one-way multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) indicated there were four individual factors that impacted the perceived frequency of hazard management which were of statistical and practical significance: job tenure in the college of employment, type of certification, gender, and overall job tenure. SPs within colleges and industries can now discuss plans revolving around these five areas instead of having to deal with all of the separate hazards. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5201342 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52013422016-12-30 Hazard Management Dealt by Safety Professionals in Colleges: The Impact of Individual Factors Wu, Tsung-Chih Chen, Chi-Hsiang Yi, Nai-Wen Lu, Pei-Chen Yu, Shan-Chi Wang, Chien-Peng Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Identifying, evaluating, and controlling workplace hazards are important functions of safety professionals (SPs). The purpose of this study was to investigate the content and frequency of hazard management dealt by safety professionals in colleges. The authors also explored the effects of organizational factors/individual factors on SPs’ perception of frequency of hazard management. The researchers conducted survey research to achieve the objective of this study. The researchers mailed questionnaires to 200 SPs in colleges after simple random sampling, then received a total of 144 valid responses (response rate = 72%). Exploratory factor analysis indicated that the hazard management scale (HMS) extracted five factors, including physical hazards, biological hazards, social and psychological hazards, ergonomic hazards, and chemical hazards. Moreover, the top 10 hazards that the survey results identified that safety professionals were most likely to deal with (in order of most to least frequent) were: organic solvents, illumination, other chemicals, machinery and equipment, fire and explosion, electricity, noise, specific chemicals, human error, and lifting/carrying. Finally, the results of one-way multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) indicated there were four individual factors that impacted the perceived frequency of hazard management which were of statistical and practical significance: job tenure in the college of employment, type of certification, gender, and overall job tenure. SPs within colleges and industries can now discuss plans revolving around these five areas instead of having to deal with all of the separate hazards. MDPI 2016-12-03 2016-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5201342/ /pubmed/27918474 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13121201 Text en © 2016 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Wu, Tsung-Chih Chen, Chi-Hsiang Yi, Nai-Wen Lu, Pei-Chen Yu, Shan-Chi Wang, Chien-Peng Hazard Management Dealt by Safety Professionals in Colleges: The Impact of Individual Factors |
title | Hazard Management Dealt by Safety Professionals in Colleges: The Impact of Individual Factors |
title_full | Hazard Management Dealt by Safety Professionals in Colleges: The Impact of Individual Factors |
title_fullStr | Hazard Management Dealt by Safety Professionals in Colleges: The Impact of Individual Factors |
title_full_unstemmed | Hazard Management Dealt by Safety Professionals in Colleges: The Impact of Individual Factors |
title_short | Hazard Management Dealt by Safety Professionals in Colleges: The Impact of Individual Factors |
title_sort | hazard management dealt by safety professionals in colleges: the impact of individual factors |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5201342/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27918474 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13121201 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wutsungchih hazardmanagementdealtbysafetyprofessionalsincollegestheimpactofindividualfactors AT chenchihsiang hazardmanagementdealtbysafetyprofessionalsincollegestheimpactofindividualfactors AT yinaiwen hazardmanagementdealtbysafetyprofessionalsincollegestheimpactofindividualfactors AT lupeichen hazardmanagementdealtbysafetyprofessionalsincollegestheimpactofindividualfactors AT yushanchi hazardmanagementdealtbysafetyprofessionalsincollegestheimpactofindividualfactors AT wangchienpeng hazardmanagementdealtbysafetyprofessionalsincollegestheimpactofindividualfactors |