Cargando…

The role of G-CSF in recurrent implantation failure: A randomized double blind placebo control trial

BACKGROUND: Recurrent implantation failure (RIF) is the absence of implantation after three consecutive In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) cycles with transferring at least four good quality embryos in a minimum of three fresh or frozen cycles in a woman under 40 years. The definition and management of RI...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Davari-tanha, Fatemeh, Shahrokh Tehraninejad, Ensieh, Ghazi, Mohadese, Shahraki, Zahra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Research and Clinical Center for Infertility 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5203688/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28066833
_version_ 1782489771541528576
author Davari-tanha, Fatemeh
Shahrokh Tehraninejad, Ensieh
Ghazi, Mohadese
Shahraki, Zahra
author_facet Davari-tanha, Fatemeh
Shahrokh Tehraninejad, Ensieh
Ghazi, Mohadese
Shahraki, Zahra
author_sort Davari-tanha, Fatemeh
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recurrent implantation failure (RIF) is the absence of implantation after three consecutive In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) cycles with transferring at least four good quality embryos in a minimum of three fresh or frozen cycles in a woman under 40 years. The definition and management of RIF is under constant scrutiny. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of Granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) on RIF, pregnancy rate, abortion rate and implantation rates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A double blind placebo controlled randomized trial was conducted at two tertiary university based hospitals. One hundred patients with the history of RIF from December 2011 until January 2014 were recruited in the study. G-CSF 300µg/1ml was administered at the day of oocyte puncture or day of progesterone administration of FET cycle. Forty patients were recruited at G-CSF group, 40 in saline and 20 in placebo group. RESULTS: The mean age for whole study group was 35.3±4.2 yrs (G-CSF 35.5±4.32, saline 35.3±3.98, placebo 35.4±4.01, respectively). Seventeen patients had a positive pregnancy test after embryo transfer [10 (25%) in G-CSF; 5 (12.5%) in saline; and 2 (10%) in placebo group]. The mean of abortion rates was 17.6% (3), two of them in G-CSF, one in saline group. The implantation rate was 12.3% in G-CSF, 6.1% in saline and 4.7% in placebo group. CONCLUSION: G-CSF may increase chemical pregnancy and implantation rate in patients with recurrent implantation failure but clinical pregnancy rate and abortion rate was unaffected.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5203688
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Research and Clinical Center for Infertility
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52036882017-01-06 The role of G-CSF in recurrent implantation failure: A randomized double blind placebo control trial Davari-tanha, Fatemeh Shahrokh Tehraninejad, Ensieh Ghazi, Mohadese Shahraki, Zahra Int J Reprod Biomed Original Article BACKGROUND: Recurrent implantation failure (RIF) is the absence of implantation after three consecutive In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) cycles with transferring at least four good quality embryos in a minimum of three fresh or frozen cycles in a woman under 40 years. The definition and management of RIF is under constant scrutiny. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of Granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) on RIF, pregnancy rate, abortion rate and implantation rates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A double blind placebo controlled randomized trial was conducted at two tertiary university based hospitals. One hundred patients with the history of RIF from December 2011 until January 2014 were recruited in the study. G-CSF 300µg/1ml was administered at the day of oocyte puncture or day of progesterone administration of FET cycle. Forty patients were recruited at G-CSF group, 40 in saline and 20 in placebo group. RESULTS: The mean age for whole study group was 35.3±4.2 yrs (G-CSF 35.5±4.32, saline 35.3±3.98, placebo 35.4±4.01, respectively). Seventeen patients had a positive pregnancy test after embryo transfer [10 (25%) in G-CSF; 5 (12.5%) in saline; and 2 (10%) in placebo group]. The mean of abortion rates was 17.6% (3), two of them in G-CSF, one in saline group. The implantation rate was 12.3% in G-CSF, 6.1% in saline and 4.7% in placebo group. CONCLUSION: G-CSF may increase chemical pregnancy and implantation rate in patients with recurrent implantation failure but clinical pregnancy rate and abortion rate was unaffected. Research and Clinical Center for Infertility 2016-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5203688/ /pubmed/28066833 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Davari-tanha, Fatemeh
Shahrokh Tehraninejad, Ensieh
Ghazi, Mohadese
Shahraki, Zahra
The role of G-CSF in recurrent implantation failure: A randomized double blind placebo control trial
title The role of G-CSF in recurrent implantation failure: A randomized double blind placebo control trial
title_full The role of G-CSF in recurrent implantation failure: A randomized double blind placebo control trial
title_fullStr The role of G-CSF in recurrent implantation failure: A randomized double blind placebo control trial
title_full_unstemmed The role of G-CSF in recurrent implantation failure: A randomized double blind placebo control trial
title_short The role of G-CSF in recurrent implantation failure: A randomized double blind placebo control trial
title_sort role of g-csf in recurrent implantation failure: a randomized double blind placebo control trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5203688/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28066833
work_keys_str_mv AT davaritanhafatemeh theroleofgcsfinrecurrentimplantationfailurearandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontroltrial
AT shahrokhtehraninejadensieh theroleofgcsfinrecurrentimplantationfailurearandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontroltrial
AT ghazimohadese theroleofgcsfinrecurrentimplantationfailurearandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontroltrial
AT shahrakizahra theroleofgcsfinrecurrentimplantationfailurearandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontroltrial
AT davaritanhafatemeh roleofgcsfinrecurrentimplantationfailurearandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontroltrial
AT shahrokhtehraninejadensieh roleofgcsfinrecurrentimplantationfailurearandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontroltrial
AT ghazimohadese roleofgcsfinrecurrentimplantationfailurearandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontroltrial
AT shahrakizahra roleofgcsfinrecurrentimplantationfailurearandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontroltrial