Cargando…

Applying Naive Bayesian Networks to Disease Prediction: a Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION: Naive Bayesian networks (NBNs) are one of the most effective and simplest Bayesian networks for prediction. OBJECTIVE: This paper aims to review published evidence about the application of NBNs in predicting disease and it tries to show NBNs as the fundamental algorithm for the best pe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Langarizadeh, Mostafa, Moghbeli, Fateme
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AVICENA, d.o.o., Sarajevo 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5203736/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28077895
http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/aim.2016.24.364-369
_version_ 1782489780730200064
author Langarizadeh, Mostafa
Moghbeli, Fateme
author_facet Langarizadeh, Mostafa
Moghbeli, Fateme
author_sort Langarizadeh, Mostafa
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Naive Bayesian networks (NBNs) are one of the most effective and simplest Bayesian networks for prediction. OBJECTIVE: This paper aims to review published evidence about the application of NBNs in predicting disease and it tries to show NBNs as the fundamental algorithm for the best performance in comparison with other algorithms. METHODS: PubMed was electronically checked for articles published between 2005 and 2015. For characterizing eligible articles, a comprehensive electronic searching method was conducted. Inclusion criteria were determined based on NBN and its effects on disease prediction. A total of 99 articles were found. After excluding the duplicates (n= 5), the titles and abstracts of 94 articles were skimmed according to the inclusion criteria. Finally, 38 articles remained. They were reviewed in full text and 15 articles were excluded. Eventually, 23 articles were selected which met our eligibility criteria and were included in this study. RESULT: In this article, the use of NBN in predicting diseases was described. Finally, the results were reported in terms of Accuracy, Sensitivity, Specificity and Area under ROC curve (AUC). The last column in Table 2 shows the differences between NBNs and other algorithms. DISCUSSION: This systematic review (23 studies, 53,725 patients) indicates that predicting diseases based on a NBN had the best performance in most diseases in comparison with the other algorithms. Finally in most cases NBN works better than other algorithms based on the reported accuracy. CONCLUSION: The method, termed NBNs is proposed and can efficiently construct a prediction model for disease.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5203736
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher AVICENA, d.o.o., Sarajevo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52037362017-01-11 Applying Naive Bayesian Networks to Disease Prediction: a Systematic Review Langarizadeh, Mostafa Moghbeli, Fateme Acta Inform Med Original Paper INTRODUCTION: Naive Bayesian networks (NBNs) are one of the most effective and simplest Bayesian networks for prediction. OBJECTIVE: This paper aims to review published evidence about the application of NBNs in predicting disease and it tries to show NBNs as the fundamental algorithm for the best performance in comparison with other algorithms. METHODS: PubMed was electronically checked for articles published between 2005 and 2015. For characterizing eligible articles, a comprehensive electronic searching method was conducted. Inclusion criteria were determined based on NBN and its effects on disease prediction. A total of 99 articles were found. After excluding the duplicates (n= 5), the titles and abstracts of 94 articles were skimmed according to the inclusion criteria. Finally, 38 articles remained. They were reviewed in full text and 15 articles were excluded. Eventually, 23 articles were selected which met our eligibility criteria and were included in this study. RESULT: In this article, the use of NBN in predicting diseases was described. Finally, the results were reported in terms of Accuracy, Sensitivity, Specificity and Area under ROC curve (AUC). The last column in Table 2 shows the differences between NBNs and other algorithms. DISCUSSION: This systematic review (23 studies, 53,725 patients) indicates that predicting diseases based on a NBN had the best performance in most diseases in comparison with the other algorithms. Finally in most cases NBN works better than other algorithms based on the reported accuracy. CONCLUSION: The method, termed NBNs is proposed and can efficiently construct a prediction model for disease. AVICENA, d.o.o., Sarajevo 2016-10 2016-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5203736/ /pubmed/28077895 http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/aim.2016.24.364-369 Text en Copyright: © 2016 Mostafa Langarizadeh and Fateme Moghbeli http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Langarizadeh, Mostafa
Moghbeli, Fateme
Applying Naive Bayesian Networks to Disease Prediction: a Systematic Review
title Applying Naive Bayesian Networks to Disease Prediction: a Systematic Review
title_full Applying Naive Bayesian Networks to Disease Prediction: a Systematic Review
title_fullStr Applying Naive Bayesian Networks to Disease Prediction: a Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Applying Naive Bayesian Networks to Disease Prediction: a Systematic Review
title_short Applying Naive Bayesian Networks to Disease Prediction: a Systematic Review
title_sort applying naive bayesian networks to disease prediction: a systematic review
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5203736/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28077895
http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/aim.2016.24.364-369
work_keys_str_mv AT langarizadehmostafa applyingnaivebayesiannetworkstodiseasepredictionasystematicreview
AT moghbelifateme applyingnaivebayesiannetworkstodiseasepredictionasystematicreview