Cargando…

Understanding fragility fracture patients’ decision-making process regarding bisphosphonate treatment

SUMMARY: We aimed to understand how patients 50 years and older decided to persist with or stop osteoporosis (OP) treatment. Processes related to persisting with or stopping OP treatments are complex and dynamic. The severity and risks and harms related to untreated clinical OP and the favorable ben...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wozniak, L. A., Johnson, J. A., McAlister, F. A., Beaupre, L. A., Bellerose, D., Rowe, B. H., Majumdar, S. R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer London 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5206259/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27423660
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00198-016-3693-5
_version_ 1782490231482613760
author Wozniak, L. A.
Johnson, J. A.
McAlister, F. A.
Beaupre, L. A.
Bellerose, D.
Rowe, B. H.
Majumdar, S. R.
author_facet Wozniak, L. A.
Johnson, J. A.
McAlister, F. A.
Beaupre, L. A.
Bellerose, D.
Rowe, B. H.
Majumdar, S. R.
author_sort Wozniak, L. A.
collection PubMed
description SUMMARY: We aimed to understand how patients 50 years and older decided to persist with or stop osteoporosis (OP) treatment. Processes related to persisting with or stopping OP treatments are complex and dynamic. The severity and risks and harms related to untreated clinical OP and the favorable benefit-to-risk profile for OP treatments should be reinforced. INTRODUCTION: Older adults with fragility fracture and clinical OP are at high risk of recurrent fracture, and treatment reduces this risk by 50 %. However, only 20 % of fracture patients are treated for OP and half stop treatment within 1 year. We aimed to understand how older patients with new fractures decided to persist with or stop OP treatment over 1 year. METHODS: We conducted a grounded theory study of patients 50 years and older with upper extremity fracture who started bisphosphonates and then reported persisting with or stopping treatment at 1 year. We used theoretical sampling to identify patients who could inform emerging concepts until data saturation was achieved and analyzed these data using constant comparison. RESULTS: We conducted 21 interviews with 12 patients. Three major themes emerged. First, patients perceived OP was not a serious health condition and considered its impact negligible. Second, persisters and stoppers differed in weighting the risks vs benefits of treatments, where persisters perceived less risk and more benefit. Persisters considered treatment “required” while stoppers often deemed treatment “optional.” Third, patients could change treatment status even 1-year post-fracture because they re-evaluated severity and impact of OP vs risks and benefits of treatments over time. CONCLUSIONS: The processes and reasoning related to persisting with or stopping OP treatments post-fracture are complex and dynamic. Our findings suggest two areas of leverage for healthcare providers to reinforce to improve persistence: (1) the severity and risks and harms related to untreated clinical OP and (2) the favorable benefit-to-risk profile for OP treatments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5206259
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer London
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52062592017-01-18 Understanding fragility fracture patients’ decision-making process regarding bisphosphonate treatment Wozniak, L. A. Johnson, J. A. McAlister, F. A. Beaupre, L. A. Bellerose, D. Rowe, B. H. Majumdar, S. R. Osteoporos Int Original Article SUMMARY: We aimed to understand how patients 50 years and older decided to persist with or stop osteoporosis (OP) treatment. Processes related to persisting with or stopping OP treatments are complex and dynamic. The severity and risks and harms related to untreated clinical OP and the favorable benefit-to-risk profile for OP treatments should be reinforced. INTRODUCTION: Older adults with fragility fracture and clinical OP are at high risk of recurrent fracture, and treatment reduces this risk by 50 %. However, only 20 % of fracture patients are treated for OP and half stop treatment within 1 year. We aimed to understand how older patients with new fractures decided to persist with or stop OP treatment over 1 year. METHODS: We conducted a grounded theory study of patients 50 years and older with upper extremity fracture who started bisphosphonates and then reported persisting with or stopping treatment at 1 year. We used theoretical sampling to identify patients who could inform emerging concepts until data saturation was achieved and analyzed these data using constant comparison. RESULTS: We conducted 21 interviews with 12 patients. Three major themes emerged. First, patients perceived OP was not a serious health condition and considered its impact negligible. Second, persisters and stoppers differed in weighting the risks vs benefits of treatments, where persisters perceived less risk and more benefit. Persisters considered treatment “required” while stoppers often deemed treatment “optional.” Third, patients could change treatment status even 1-year post-fracture because they re-evaluated severity and impact of OP vs risks and benefits of treatments over time. CONCLUSIONS: The processes and reasoning related to persisting with or stopping OP treatments post-fracture are complex and dynamic. Our findings suggest two areas of leverage for healthcare providers to reinforce to improve persistence: (1) the severity and risks and harms related to untreated clinical OP and (2) the favorable benefit-to-risk profile for OP treatments. Springer London 2016-07-16 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5206259/ /pubmed/27423660 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00198-016-3693-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Wozniak, L. A.
Johnson, J. A.
McAlister, F. A.
Beaupre, L. A.
Bellerose, D.
Rowe, B. H.
Majumdar, S. R.
Understanding fragility fracture patients’ decision-making process regarding bisphosphonate treatment
title Understanding fragility fracture patients’ decision-making process regarding bisphosphonate treatment
title_full Understanding fragility fracture patients’ decision-making process regarding bisphosphonate treatment
title_fullStr Understanding fragility fracture patients’ decision-making process regarding bisphosphonate treatment
title_full_unstemmed Understanding fragility fracture patients’ decision-making process regarding bisphosphonate treatment
title_short Understanding fragility fracture patients’ decision-making process regarding bisphosphonate treatment
title_sort understanding fragility fracture patients’ decision-making process regarding bisphosphonate treatment
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5206259/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27423660
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00198-016-3693-5
work_keys_str_mv AT wozniakla understandingfragilityfracturepatientsdecisionmakingprocessregardingbisphosphonatetreatment
AT johnsonja understandingfragilityfracturepatientsdecisionmakingprocessregardingbisphosphonatetreatment
AT mcalisterfa understandingfragilityfracturepatientsdecisionmakingprocessregardingbisphosphonatetreatment
AT beauprela understandingfragilityfracturepatientsdecisionmakingprocessregardingbisphosphonatetreatment
AT bellerosed understandingfragilityfracturepatientsdecisionmakingprocessregardingbisphosphonatetreatment
AT rowebh understandingfragilityfracturepatientsdecisionmakingprocessregardingbisphosphonatetreatment
AT majumdarsr understandingfragilityfracturepatientsdecisionmakingprocessregardingbisphosphonatetreatment