Cargando…
Evaluation of Two Methods for Determination of CD64 as a Diagnostic Marker of Infection in Critically Ill Adults
Objectives. Diagnostic markers of infection have had little innovation over the last few decades. CD64, a marker expressed on the surface of neutrophils, may have utility for this purpose. Methods. This study was conducted in an adult intensive care unit (ICU) in São Paulo, Brazil, with 89 patients....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5206427/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28097142 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/6593232 |
_version_ | 1782490254775681024 |
---|---|
author | Zinsly Sampaio Camargo, Thiago Marra, Alexandre R. Bacal, Nydia Strachman Casaroto, Eduardo Pinto, Lilian Moreira Pasternak, Jacyr Victor, Elivane da Silva dos Santos, Oscar Fernando Pavão Edmond, Michael B. |
author_facet | Zinsly Sampaio Camargo, Thiago Marra, Alexandre R. Bacal, Nydia Strachman Casaroto, Eduardo Pinto, Lilian Moreira Pasternak, Jacyr Victor, Elivane da Silva dos Santos, Oscar Fernando Pavão Edmond, Michael B. |
author_sort | Zinsly Sampaio Camargo, Thiago |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objectives. Diagnostic markers of infection have had little innovation over the last few decades. CD64, a marker expressed on the surface of neutrophils, may have utility for this purpose. Methods. This study was conducted in an adult intensive care unit (ICU) in São Paulo, Brazil, with 89 patients. We evaluated CD64 in patients with documented or clinically diagnosed infection (infection group) and controls (patients without any evidence of infection) by two different methodologies: method #1, an in house assay, and method #2, the commercial kit Leuko64 (Trillium Diagnostics). Results. CD64 displayed good discriminating power with a 91.2% sensitivity (95% CI 90.7–91.6%) for detecting infection. The commercial kit (Leuko64) demonstrated higher specificity (87.3%) compared with method #1 as well as better accuracy (88.8%). Conclusions. CD64 seems to be a promising marker of infection in the intensive care setting, with Leuko64 showing a slight advantage. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5206427 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52064272017-01-17 Evaluation of Two Methods for Determination of CD64 as a Diagnostic Marker of Infection in Critically Ill Adults Zinsly Sampaio Camargo, Thiago Marra, Alexandre R. Bacal, Nydia Strachman Casaroto, Eduardo Pinto, Lilian Moreira Pasternak, Jacyr Victor, Elivane da Silva dos Santos, Oscar Fernando Pavão Edmond, Michael B. Biomed Res Int Research Article Objectives. Diagnostic markers of infection have had little innovation over the last few decades. CD64, a marker expressed on the surface of neutrophils, may have utility for this purpose. Methods. This study was conducted in an adult intensive care unit (ICU) in São Paulo, Brazil, with 89 patients. We evaluated CD64 in patients with documented or clinically diagnosed infection (infection group) and controls (patients without any evidence of infection) by two different methodologies: method #1, an in house assay, and method #2, the commercial kit Leuko64 (Trillium Diagnostics). Results. CD64 displayed good discriminating power with a 91.2% sensitivity (95% CI 90.7–91.6%) for detecting infection. The commercial kit (Leuko64) demonstrated higher specificity (87.3%) compared with method #1 as well as better accuracy (88.8%). Conclusions. CD64 seems to be a promising marker of infection in the intensive care setting, with Leuko64 showing a slight advantage. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016 2016-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5206427/ /pubmed/28097142 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/6593232 Text en Copyright © 2016 Thiago Zinsly Sampaio Camargo et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Zinsly Sampaio Camargo, Thiago Marra, Alexandre R. Bacal, Nydia Strachman Casaroto, Eduardo Pinto, Lilian Moreira Pasternak, Jacyr Victor, Elivane da Silva dos Santos, Oscar Fernando Pavão Edmond, Michael B. Evaluation of Two Methods for Determination of CD64 as a Diagnostic Marker of Infection in Critically Ill Adults |
title | Evaluation of Two Methods for Determination of CD64 as a Diagnostic Marker of Infection in Critically Ill Adults |
title_full | Evaluation of Two Methods for Determination of CD64 as a Diagnostic Marker of Infection in Critically Ill Adults |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of Two Methods for Determination of CD64 as a Diagnostic Marker of Infection in Critically Ill Adults |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Two Methods for Determination of CD64 as a Diagnostic Marker of Infection in Critically Ill Adults |
title_short | Evaluation of Two Methods for Determination of CD64 as a Diagnostic Marker of Infection in Critically Ill Adults |
title_sort | evaluation of two methods for determination of cd64 as a diagnostic marker of infection in critically ill adults |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5206427/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28097142 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/6593232 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zinslysampaiocamargothiago evaluationoftwomethodsfordeterminationofcd64asadiagnosticmarkerofinfectionincriticallyilladults AT marraalexandrer evaluationoftwomethodsfordeterminationofcd64asadiagnosticmarkerofinfectionincriticallyilladults AT bacalnydiastrachman evaluationoftwomethodsfordeterminationofcd64asadiagnosticmarkerofinfectionincriticallyilladults AT casarotoeduardo evaluationoftwomethodsfordeterminationofcd64asadiagnosticmarkerofinfectionincriticallyilladults AT pintolilianmoreira evaluationoftwomethodsfordeterminationofcd64asadiagnosticmarkerofinfectionincriticallyilladults AT pasternakjacyr evaluationoftwomethodsfordeterminationofcd64asadiagnosticmarkerofinfectionincriticallyilladults AT victorelivanedasilva evaluationoftwomethodsfordeterminationofcd64asadiagnosticmarkerofinfectionincriticallyilladults AT dossantososcarfernandopavao evaluationoftwomethodsfordeterminationofcd64asadiagnosticmarkerofinfectionincriticallyilladults AT edmondmichaelb evaluationoftwomethodsfordeterminationofcd64asadiagnosticmarkerofinfectionincriticallyilladults |