Cargando…

Evaluation of Two Methods for Determination of CD64 as a Diagnostic Marker of Infection in Critically Ill Adults

Objectives. Diagnostic markers of infection have had little innovation over the last few decades. CD64, a marker expressed on the surface of neutrophils, may have utility for this purpose. Methods. This study was conducted in an adult intensive care unit (ICU) in São Paulo, Brazil, with 89 patients....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zinsly Sampaio Camargo, Thiago, Marra, Alexandre R., Bacal, Nydia Strachman, Casaroto, Eduardo, Pinto, Lilian Moreira, Pasternak, Jacyr, Victor, Elivane da Silva, dos Santos, Oscar Fernando Pavão, Edmond, Michael B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5206427/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28097142
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/6593232
_version_ 1782490254775681024
author Zinsly Sampaio Camargo, Thiago
Marra, Alexandre R.
Bacal, Nydia Strachman
Casaroto, Eduardo
Pinto, Lilian Moreira
Pasternak, Jacyr
Victor, Elivane da Silva
dos Santos, Oscar Fernando Pavão
Edmond, Michael B.
author_facet Zinsly Sampaio Camargo, Thiago
Marra, Alexandre R.
Bacal, Nydia Strachman
Casaroto, Eduardo
Pinto, Lilian Moreira
Pasternak, Jacyr
Victor, Elivane da Silva
dos Santos, Oscar Fernando Pavão
Edmond, Michael B.
author_sort Zinsly Sampaio Camargo, Thiago
collection PubMed
description Objectives. Diagnostic markers of infection have had little innovation over the last few decades. CD64, a marker expressed on the surface of neutrophils, may have utility for this purpose. Methods. This study was conducted in an adult intensive care unit (ICU) in São Paulo, Brazil, with 89 patients. We evaluated CD64 in patients with documented or clinically diagnosed infection (infection group) and controls (patients without any evidence of infection) by two different methodologies: method #1, an in house assay, and method #2, the commercial kit Leuko64 (Trillium Diagnostics). Results. CD64 displayed good discriminating power with a 91.2% sensitivity (95% CI 90.7–91.6%) for detecting infection. The commercial kit (Leuko64) demonstrated higher specificity (87.3%) compared with method #1 as well as better accuracy (88.8%). Conclusions. CD64 seems to be a promising marker of infection in the intensive care setting, with Leuko64 showing a slight advantage.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5206427
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52064272017-01-17 Evaluation of Two Methods for Determination of CD64 as a Diagnostic Marker of Infection in Critically Ill Adults Zinsly Sampaio Camargo, Thiago Marra, Alexandre R. Bacal, Nydia Strachman Casaroto, Eduardo Pinto, Lilian Moreira Pasternak, Jacyr Victor, Elivane da Silva dos Santos, Oscar Fernando Pavão Edmond, Michael B. Biomed Res Int Research Article Objectives. Diagnostic markers of infection have had little innovation over the last few decades. CD64, a marker expressed on the surface of neutrophils, may have utility for this purpose. Methods. This study was conducted in an adult intensive care unit (ICU) in São Paulo, Brazil, with 89 patients. We evaluated CD64 in patients with documented or clinically diagnosed infection (infection group) and controls (patients without any evidence of infection) by two different methodologies: method #1, an in house assay, and method #2, the commercial kit Leuko64 (Trillium Diagnostics). Results. CD64 displayed good discriminating power with a 91.2% sensitivity (95% CI 90.7–91.6%) for detecting infection. The commercial kit (Leuko64) demonstrated higher specificity (87.3%) compared with method #1 as well as better accuracy (88.8%). Conclusions. CD64 seems to be a promising marker of infection in the intensive care setting, with Leuko64 showing a slight advantage. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016 2016-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5206427/ /pubmed/28097142 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/6593232 Text en Copyright © 2016 Thiago Zinsly Sampaio Camargo et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zinsly Sampaio Camargo, Thiago
Marra, Alexandre R.
Bacal, Nydia Strachman
Casaroto, Eduardo
Pinto, Lilian Moreira
Pasternak, Jacyr
Victor, Elivane da Silva
dos Santos, Oscar Fernando Pavão
Edmond, Michael B.
Evaluation of Two Methods for Determination of CD64 as a Diagnostic Marker of Infection in Critically Ill Adults
title Evaluation of Two Methods for Determination of CD64 as a Diagnostic Marker of Infection in Critically Ill Adults
title_full Evaluation of Two Methods for Determination of CD64 as a Diagnostic Marker of Infection in Critically Ill Adults
title_fullStr Evaluation of Two Methods for Determination of CD64 as a Diagnostic Marker of Infection in Critically Ill Adults
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Two Methods for Determination of CD64 as a Diagnostic Marker of Infection in Critically Ill Adults
title_short Evaluation of Two Methods for Determination of CD64 as a Diagnostic Marker of Infection in Critically Ill Adults
title_sort evaluation of two methods for determination of cd64 as a diagnostic marker of infection in critically ill adults
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5206427/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28097142
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/6593232
work_keys_str_mv AT zinslysampaiocamargothiago evaluationoftwomethodsfordeterminationofcd64asadiagnosticmarkerofinfectionincriticallyilladults
AT marraalexandrer evaluationoftwomethodsfordeterminationofcd64asadiagnosticmarkerofinfectionincriticallyilladults
AT bacalnydiastrachman evaluationoftwomethodsfordeterminationofcd64asadiagnosticmarkerofinfectionincriticallyilladults
AT casarotoeduardo evaluationoftwomethodsfordeterminationofcd64asadiagnosticmarkerofinfectionincriticallyilladults
AT pintolilianmoreira evaluationoftwomethodsfordeterminationofcd64asadiagnosticmarkerofinfectionincriticallyilladults
AT pasternakjacyr evaluationoftwomethodsfordeterminationofcd64asadiagnosticmarkerofinfectionincriticallyilladults
AT victorelivanedasilva evaluationoftwomethodsfordeterminationofcd64asadiagnosticmarkerofinfectionincriticallyilladults
AT dossantososcarfernandopavao evaluationoftwomethodsfordeterminationofcd64asadiagnosticmarkerofinfectionincriticallyilladults
AT edmondmichaelb evaluationoftwomethodsfordeterminationofcd64asadiagnosticmarkerofinfectionincriticallyilladults