Cargando…

Clinical anatomy of the inferior epigastric artery with special relevance to invasive procedures of the anterior abdominal wall

INTRODUCTION: Injury to the inferior epigastric artery (IEA) has been reported following lower abdominal wall surgical incisions, abdominal peritoneocentesis and trocar placements at laparoscopic port sites, resulting in the formation of abdominal wall haematomas that may expand considerably due to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Joy, Praisy, Prithishkumar, Ivan James, Isaac, Bina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5206834/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27251822
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-9941.181331
_version_ 1782490304022052864
author Joy, Praisy
Prithishkumar, Ivan James
Isaac, Bina
author_facet Joy, Praisy
Prithishkumar, Ivan James
Isaac, Bina
author_sort Joy, Praisy
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Injury to the inferior epigastric artery (IEA) has been reported following lower abdominal wall surgical incisions, abdominal peritoneocentesis and trocar placements at laparoscopic port sites, resulting in the formation of abdominal wall haematomas that may expand considerably due to lack of tissue resistance. The aim of this study was to localise its course in relation to standard anatomic landmarks and suggest safe areas for performance of invasive procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty IEAs of 30 adult cadavers (male = 19; female = 11) were dissected and the course of the IEA noted in relation to the mid-inguinal point, anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS) and umbilicus. RESULTS: The mean distance of the IEA from the midline was 4.45 ± 1.42 cm at the level of the mid-inguinal point, 4.10 ± 1.15 cm at the level of ASIS and 4.49 ± 1.15 cm at the level of umbilicus. There was an average of 3.3 branches per IEA with more branches arising from its lateral aspect. The IEA was situated within one-third (32%) of the distance between the midline and the sagittal plane through ASIS at all levels. CONCLUSION: To avoid injury to IEA, trocars can be safely inserted 5.5 cm [mean + 1 standard deviation (SD)] away from the midline (or) slightly more than one-third of the distance between the midline and a sagittal plane running through ASIS. These findings may be useful not only for laparoscopic procedures but also for image-guided biopsy, abdominal paracentesis, and placement of abdominal drains.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5206834
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52068342017-01-25 Clinical anatomy of the inferior epigastric artery with special relevance to invasive procedures of the anterior abdominal wall Joy, Praisy Prithishkumar, Ivan James Isaac, Bina J Minim Access Surg Original Article INTRODUCTION: Injury to the inferior epigastric artery (IEA) has been reported following lower abdominal wall surgical incisions, abdominal peritoneocentesis and trocar placements at laparoscopic port sites, resulting in the formation of abdominal wall haematomas that may expand considerably due to lack of tissue resistance. The aim of this study was to localise its course in relation to standard anatomic landmarks and suggest safe areas for performance of invasive procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty IEAs of 30 adult cadavers (male = 19; female = 11) were dissected and the course of the IEA noted in relation to the mid-inguinal point, anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS) and umbilicus. RESULTS: The mean distance of the IEA from the midline was 4.45 ± 1.42 cm at the level of the mid-inguinal point, 4.10 ± 1.15 cm at the level of ASIS and 4.49 ± 1.15 cm at the level of umbilicus. There was an average of 3.3 branches per IEA with more branches arising from its lateral aspect. The IEA was situated within one-third (32%) of the distance between the midline and the sagittal plane through ASIS at all levels. CONCLUSION: To avoid injury to IEA, trocars can be safely inserted 5.5 cm [mean + 1 standard deviation (SD)] away from the midline (or) slightly more than one-third of the distance between the midline and a sagittal plane running through ASIS. These findings may be useful not only for laparoscopic procedures but also for image-guided biopsy, abdominal paracentesis, and placement of abdominal drains. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5206834/ /pubmed/27251822 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-9941.181331 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Journal of Minimal Access Surgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Joy, Praisy
Prithishkumar, Ivan James
Isaac, Bina
Clinical anatomy of the inferior epigastric artery with special relevance to invasive procedures of the anterior abdominal wall
title Clinical anatomy of the inferior epigastric artery with special relevance to invasive procedures of the anterior abdominal wall
title_full Clinical anatomy of the inferior epigastric artery with special relevance to invasive procedures of the anterior abdominal wall
title_fullStr Clinical anatomy of the inferior epigastric artery with special relevance to invasive procedures of the anterior abdominal wall
title_full_unstemmed Clinical anatomy of the inferior epigastric artery with special relevance to invasive procedures of the anterior abdominal wall
title_short Clinical anatomy of the inferior epigastric artery with special relevance to invasive procedures of the anterior abdominal wall
title_sort clinical anatomy of the inferior epigastric artery with special relevance to invasive procedures of the anterior abdominal wall
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5206834/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27251822
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-9941.181331
work_keys_str_mv AT joypraisy clinicalanatomyoftheinferiorepigastricarterywithspecialrelevancetoinvasiveproceduresoftheanteriorabdominalwall
AT prithishkumarivanjames clinicalanatomyoftheinferiorepigastricarterywithspecialrelevancetoinvasiveproceduresoftheanteriorabdominalwall
AT isaacbina clinicalanatomyoftheinferiorepigastricarterywithspecialrelevancetoinvasiveproceduresoftheanteriorabdominalwall